ILO v ILP Debate #4 ~ Logical Positivism

[ihatesophistry]

iloveopinions.com/index.php?topic=3869.0

@realunoriginal

Logical Negativism, and why Logical Positivism is for complete-morons…

1.) All logical premises are built upon, and predicated by, “Experiential-Teleos”.

2.) Position and Negation are respective, Hypothetical-metaphysical forces.

3.) Logical Positivism is based-upon sufficient-truth and not necessary-truth.

In this debate I will assert the three propositions above against ILP.

ILO will field 2 contestants (RU, Satyr) who will represent the ILO website and its caliber of thinking.

ILP will field 2 of its own contestants (Faust and either Ingenium, or, Tabula Rasa).

Once the two teams are setup, Pavlovianmodel will be the sole judge as he has taken sides with & against both ILP and ILO in the past. Pav will setup an open time when the Debate will begin and (perhaps) an undisclosed time when it will end. There will be NO RULES inside the debate thread except that there 1) will be a time limit and 2) the debaters only-will be allowed to post/respond, no others inside the thread. When the debate begins Pav will post the OP with my propositions above, quoted, and everybody will be allowed to respond them either in-favor of them or disproving them. Since the debate will be open-ended, anybody may disagree with the premises. All that will be judged is the quality of thinkers on ILO and ILP to see which are Superior Thinkers and Intellects. When the end of the debate comes, Pav will cut-off whatever point is being made, lock the thread, delete posts made AFTER the timelimit, and judge based upon what has been stated up to that current point in time.

After the Judgment comes, and the debate has been decided, either ILP or ILO may continue arguing the points in the thread whether one side lost, or not.

Further ideas & suggestions about the debate format are welcome.

There may be one thread or two, on either the ILO or ILP website, where quotation should be cited for consistency, unless Pav decides to hold the entire debate on ILO (since RU and Satyr both permanently-have-been banned from ILP and cannot post there under their proper usernames).

[Tab]

RU, are you sure you can represent ILO…? Since you’ve pretty much been banned over there, amid multiform clashes on the boards between you and the members.

Congratulations btw. to get banned on anarchic lil’ ol ILO must have taken a degree of assholeness seldom before achieved by the likes of man.

[ihatesophistry]

RU states the following:

Yes of course I can represent ILO as we have a love-hate relationship amidst the community; they love-to-hate me and hate-to-love me.

Now hurry-up and accept the challenge lest ye be the cowards everybody fears you to be!

[xzc]

@Tab

RU, are you sure you can represent ILO…? Since you’ve pretty much been banned over there, amid multiform clashes on the boards between you and the members.

Congratulations btw. to get banned on anarchic lil’ ol ILO must have taken a degree of assholeness seldom before achieved by the likes of man.

He’s not banned. He’s just been given a bridge to troll under.

[xzc]

If you choose to take up this debate, know that this is the person you will be debating against:

@realunoriginal

@Zoot Allures

I see your whole life

That is, of course, only if I have posted my whole life here at ILO.

So far I’ve only given you scraps to work with.

Enough scraps that I see you as the scared, little Lebanese boy who cries & screams for his mothers saggy, disease-laden breast milk, to only-receive-none of it time & time again… Poor baby!!! ~there-there, I know your bones run dry from lack of nourishment but your mother is around-the-block with a few men, earning her pay just for you-- Oh, whats that?? ~you mean she spends all the money on herself!?!? ~what a bitch!!! AND WHERE IS DADDY!?!!? ~THAT BASTARD!!!

MOMMMMY!!! ~MOM!!! ~PAY ATTENTION TO ME!!! ~MY NAME IS ZOOT ALLURES AND I NEED YOUR ATTENTION!!!

Yes I know you well Persian Princess, all-too-well. ;D

You have the Audacity to think you are ‘Special’ or exempt from your own stupidity.

Unfortunately-speaking, for ILO and the wider world, your stupidity is much too brilliant for that.

The World is your Mother, boy, and you are screaming for nourishment, from all & anything.

[Tab]

Oh well, in that case bring it on. Under two conditions however:

1. The event be held in ILP’s Rant section.
2. Somebody tells me what logical positiwhatsitism is.

[ihatesophistry]

@Tab

Oh well, in that case bring it on. Under two conditions however:

1. The event be held in ILP’s Rant section.
2. Somebody tells me what logical positiwhatsitism is.

RU states the following:

Sure, Tab, the event can be held in ILP’s Rant section, if, Carleas-himself un-bans both Satyr and realunoriginal for the debate. Until that happens the debate will be held at ILO. And I will continue to push for ILO home turf unless ILP grows a pair.

That is all for now; prepare for and expect your appropriate ass-whoopings to come!!!

[Tab]

Oh well, you’re totally fucked then.

[ihatesophistry]

@Tab

Oh well, you’re totally fucked then.

RU states the following:

I actually-am-not “fucked”, coward. Because as the ‘rules’ of this debate goes there generally-are-no ‘rules’ and that means your participation is not even required for you to get your ass handed to you. Is that not clever of me??? See you can just stand there while I assault your Garden of Eden. Your defense is not even required. Besides ingenium has a bigger pair than you anyway; one Amerikan Feminist = 10 macho-manly-men-Turks with small peckers. Were you aware of that before now??? Well you get the picture; you are not needed either-way. A woman can take your place and that would be most-fitting for ILP representation anyway.

Prepare for the post, on ILO home-turf! See you there, sucker, or not!!!

The debate begins with-or-without you. Faust is the pinnacle here, not you, cowboy.

[Tab]

yeah, whatever.