Things that are not alive canāt believe. So, whoever these people are, they live and believe.
The non-living cannot be psychotic, hence this anyone is alive.
So says the binary processing biological machine which exists because it needs to exist to claim that it doesnāt exist and therefore doesnāt lie when it claims that it exists and doesnāt exist because it doesnāt possess life.
How will you ever understand representation of reality (non illusionary) science if you constantly think like a lifeless binary processing machine?
Nobody is interested in the religious cult of mainstream pseudoscienceās misrepresentation of reality (illusionary) nonsense anymoreā¦itās all cognitively biased BS.
I am sure he will meditate profoundly on the question.
Answer the question Mary-Poppins.
You know next to zero about me.
Well, this is patently false. Even if you are right and they are wrong obviously many people are interested in it. You seem to have tremendous faith in repetition. You donāt seem to understand other people. This doesnāt matter if it doesnāt matter to you and if you donāt care if people agree with you or even understand your position. But if you do care and also want them to agree or at least understand, you might consider a different approach.
Psychotic people are alive. By definition. The inorganic cannot be psychotic. What you donāt do is interact with what other people say. You simply declare they are X.
No greenfuseā¦..I simply donāt think like a lifeless binary processing biological machine like you do.
Where is life in an illusion exactly?ā¦you are delusional greenfuse.
That is not what the title asks. Read the title. See my answer.
And keep your insults and ad homs to yourself.
You are foundering greenfuseā¦ā¦..you insist that I answer your questions and yet refuse point blank to answer any of mine.
I know how philosophy relates to reality science greenfuseā¦.you donāt.
Your pseudoscience is a misrepresentation of reality rememberā¦.it doesnāt represent reality.
Your question above is not related to anything I said. Youāre asking me to defend a position I do not have.
Can you understand that this has no content, no justification, nothing. It just claims I know and you donāt. Mull for a moment how this moves a conversation forward. Because in communication with you I get a lot of this and not much dealing with explanation, justification or interaction with what I write. Maybe you donāt care if people understand you or see how you arrived at your position (justification). If you donāt care, please say that.
Noā¦I know ā¦and you donāt.
I do care which is why I explain representation of reality (non illusionary) science in my postsā¦.I keep telling you greenfuseā¦nobody is interested in the religious cult of mainstream misrepresentation of reality (illusionary) pseudoscience anymore.
Itās all deluded BSā¦.all of itā¦who in their right mind claims that there is life in an illusion?
You exist because you need to exist to claim that you donāt exist and you are a representation of reality (non illusion)ā¦.which means you arenāt a misrepresentation of reality (illusion).
Thanks, Authoritarian,been sleeping through, It, Iāll join the phenominalists any time soon,
again
relive whatās left, off
The psychotic religious cranks/crack pots who exist because they need to exist to claim that they donāt exist and who claim that everything is a misrepresentation of reality even their own claims want us to believe that there is life in illusionsā¦ā¦what?ā¦..why are we listening to a deluded religious cult?
Partly because the lost sea scrolls have some credibility, in terms of analysis by anthropologists testifying through DNAevidence. Some contentions about Mary Magdalene is fairly convincing, if some current hardwired ideas are more fluid then utterly stable entities.
Other things somewhat convincing as well, such as the distinction between up and coming quantum and biologically consistent cyber-intelligence. I am divided totally but if I were to lean toward a negation and a very subtle reposition toward a reaffirmation away from mere contradiction, Iād probably go toward the latter.
The sheer force of doubt is a heavy burden , .
There most certainly is a real world that is objective and closest thing we have to it is nature. The artificial realm of human civilization is largely illusory, most of our problems self created and self inflicted.
The real world is communicated to us via vibration.
The physical body biological machine exists in the void and receives varying frequency electromagnetic energy waves emitted from all vibrating matter via its antenna senses.
As soon as we, the person, the culture, the natural progression of man tries to analyze where he, the singularity is coming from , the State arises: e.i.the sate of being and of the mind and every other conceivable state One can(s) form an image, then the analysis start,
The analysis or the setting of markers , of limited breaf ups and downs of categorization, so that the limitless can be apurviewef and managed as something subcategorical. The analysis then stops, when certain limits are reached, and when the a(e)ffected limits show this deprocedsing phase in principal.
Call it the quantum-quanta effect, the searc for this limit imeets the criteria, within which the realization dawns that its transgormative aspect nills its very categotized exactness. At this point everything becomes pre-formative, reduced yo a preformance.
And the the question becomes: whatās new that ever not occurred before?