In what way is there life in psychotic religious cranks/crack pots who believe that they are a misrepresentation of reality (an illusion)?
Jupiter, that depends whether others believe that the preacher was cracked before or after their belief that they are an illusion of reality,
âIn what way is there life in psychotic religious cranks/crack pots who believe that they are a misrepresentation of reality (an illusion)?â ; or whether others claim of the illusionary nature of their crack up to become unreal as represented.
But thirdly they may hedge the issue, who want to get out of such confusing entanglement , by claiming yes, those preachers in deed caused their own illusions and have cracked up (became unhinged through their own self imposed conflation.
Are we talking about the Buddha?
No merely the next step down, the bodhattshiva.
Ah, a fence-sitter.
Nobody knows what heâs talking about. Not even him
One thing , tough, but before commenting, yes I donât really know what I really talk about since I am represented by illusionary, admittedly non revelatory authority ( sensei ) .
So what?
The thing is: itâs transcendently clear, that is until willfully obstructed like by blinders, purposefully evaded, as the way to the only exit sense.
Sorry I meant Jupiter. I guess that also applies to you, but I did mean Jupiter
1 Like
Thanks for that, and yes, references may stead toward conflated interpretation.
I wonât even try to figure out what you mean
Itâs a fancy way of saying: âIf you think Iâm the one whoâs confused, look in the mirrorâyouâre the one who canât keep your targets straight.â
âbut tracing the response train would have made it clear.
Can You trace it? No worries if the answer is not in the affirmative. We do understand,
We think.
There are many psychotic religious cranks/crack pots who exist and believe that they are a misrepresentation of reality (an illusion) rather than a representation of reality (a non illusion).
As you are a representation of reality (a non illusion) then you arenât a misrepresentation of reality (an illusion) in your existence.
I think so. Flannel responded to my post âAre we talking about the Buddha?â I canât see what in your post would have led to the Buddha, but one can see the thread title as insulting referring to the Buddha. I knew he meant Jupiter123 and had interpreted me correctly.
You referred to a âpreacherâ which leans to other religions.
That said, your posts take a lot of work to get the meaning. So, I think conflation is not out of bounds.
As Jesus would have said in his main language: Ü«ÜȘÜȘÜ ÜĄÜšÜ ÜÜąÜÜ©ÜŠÜ (pronounced -Shrah-rah m-say d-naz-kpakh). So, no one should feel bad.
I dont understand the question.
Your idea about what reality is, is an assumption to begin with.
Every human being lives in a subjective assumption about what reality is.
There is no human being in existence whoâd actually know the true shape, reason, function, extent, or anything else for that matter about the complete concept of what reality itself is.
Some people have more outlandish nutter beliefs than others. True enough.
Yet there will never be a human who knows the truth, for that would mean they are omniscient and thus god.
Come onâŠ.stop whining and answer the original question.Anyone who exists and claims to be a misrepresentation of reality (an illusion) is psychotic.In which part of an illusion is life?
Probably the part whoâs not trolling and can live to talk about it.
he he
Pls. donât get me wrong, by the grace given.
Ps in my book your all friends including Mary Magdalene. She was the most next to St. Ggeorge
A binary processing biological machine which doesnât possess life needs to exist to claim that it doesnât exist, you guys. Itâs time to put away the Mickey Mouse science.
Re lived thanks
Self versus no self?
