Say we decide that things are so effed up we all want to get serious about changing the things that we all agree are messed up.
We want to agree on some common theses or articles to declare in a unified intersectional petition.
First, we compile a list of grievances, whether or not we agree on them. Just a list of all the crap we are definitely done with. At the same time, we have a list of solutions to address those grievances.
We promote the petition until we are 100% certain every living set of eyeballs, or other sensory organs (brains, preferably), has had time to process it and check all the boxes next to the items they are also done with, while contributing their own. They can update the checked boxes after being notified of new items.
Statistical charts are automatically updated showing which items are unanimously agreed-upon, all the way down to which items only one person agrees on.
It is made impossible to have more than one account.
Once everyone has had a chance to sign the petition, the plan of action is initiated.
Hopefully decision makers already aware of the petition have already been moving to fix items unanimously agreed upon.
You can see just how unanimous it is and you don’t even have to do a census or perform any kind of election or vote.
Representatives are required by social pressure alone to make their petition answers public.
Wouldn’t you love to see what we all agree on about what needs to change?
Of course, there will be goofballs that contribute ridiculous items for the humor of it. Finally politics will be interesting. …but AI would definitely have to reduce redundancy.