Absolutely.
God bless you, my son.
Anyway, I’ve run the test and confirmed, yes, when you get to +1000 tails, you’re just as likely to go even more tails afterwards as you are to go more towards the center/heads
I’m sure it was a brilliant test.
Thanks bro! I bet it would pass a code review too. You know there are places online to get free code reviews? You should submit your code there, or allow me to on your behalf.
I would prefer you never, now or at any time ever, endeavoured to do a single thing on my behalf.
Of course, the thought is very kind and speaks of an indubitably great man, a great man.
Maybe I’ll rewrite it from scratch so it becomes my code (after all, it is based on my code), but does the same thing as your code, and see what people think about it.
Maybe a worm will do what a worm will do.
Or an eagle.
Or a fly.
All things, one supposes, will do as each thing does, I suppose.
You know, I think that it makes sense that you’re really proud of your code, I really do - and if I made some really good piece of code that proved a really interesting result, I personally wouldn’t want this forum to be the only place I shared it. I wouldn’t want it to be lost in forum history, for nobody except Flannel Jesus and Carleas to have ever looked at it.
Get it out there, see what people think.
I would venture to suggest you submit your own code, and see how that goes.
I don’t even think anybody would look at my code, because my code proves something boring. It proves something everyone already knows - coin flips are 50-50. Who wants to review code that proves something as boring as that?
Yes, yes, I am sure you are right, that would certainly be the reason.
But I am fine with it being reviewed, of course. I just don’t think anybody would care.
Of course, as the master says.
Do YOU want to see what people think of my code? If you want to see that, I can put it up for review.
I must admit my absolute lack of interest, even coming from such an eminent and great personage.
Okay. I won’t do that then
I am sure the master will pick a wise course of action, what ever it is.
In any case, Carleas and I now have a slate of tests that demonstrate the equality of coin flips and permutations, and you’re obsessed with one flawed test and unwilling to consider any flaws in it. The flaw is definitely subtle, and I understand why you don’t intuitively understand why it’s a flaw at all, so there’s apparently nothing I can really do to get you to consider that anymore.
A master’s position must be most perplexing.
A lowly miser like myself could only hope to understand such vexing problems of an advanced mind after many lifetimes, and even then…