Is it racist?

Is it racist if we say that all white people should die? Being that white people are perpetrators of imperialistic white colonialism perpetrating racism, isn’t it the end goal that all white people are gotten rid of everywhere on planet earth overtime?

Being that white males are the biggest perpetrators of racism, shouldn’t we encourage them to be suicidal as a collective act of social justice worldwide? Wouldn’t their mass suicides be the ultimate form of social justice and racial redistribution against racism?

So, what do others here think? Is it racism, or racial social justice being implied here?

The species ‘man’, whom we divide into phylogenic categories for the purposes of identification, has evolved a natural instinct to be weary and suspicious of those in another phylogenic category. This instinct is the basis of racism, and even though the races are existing in relative harmony (compared to their warring during the age of empires), the feeling of disinterest, uneasiness, or even repulsion toward a person of another race is still there… pushed back, sedated, made tolerable through centuries of civlilizing man.

So everybody is a racist. Even black childrens cry out in fear when their own moms go to pick em up because they’re so scary lookin (this was an actual experiment with childrens).

Racism is built in… a modified behavior that keeps you from putting yourself in the dangerous presence of strange creatures that might harm you.

Be that as it may, Whitey is only called the bad guy because he’s the race that ended up securing the industrial power to dominate all the other races before he got dominated by them… and so the kneegrows, mexicans, AArabs and chineese people are mad at em.

1 Like

I think that sort of thinking is a vicious cycle, because when you become the oppressor, when you become the dominant majority that recycles the errors that you are trying to abolish, you’ve missed the point, haven’t you?

We leave ourselves behind when we leave others behind. So let’s draw wider circles around those who exclude us, and show them the art of cultivating creative inclusivity.

…but they have to be free to stay outside the circle if they choose.

1 Like

The Males and Females of Every Species Syndicate give you the side-eye

I don’t know, that sounds like something a racist apologist would say. Besides, only white European people ethnically are capable of inherent racism, unless you are both white and Jewish which comes with its own unique special rule sets. Because people of color are a part of the group that is oppressed, they’re incapable of being racist, racism is something only white European people are simply capable of.

It’s like that latest GoFund Me Page where they raised money for that black dude to be released from jail who knifed the white running track kid, the white teenager was the oppressive colonizer deserving to die, the black kid with the knife was the oppressed racial minority rebelling against systemic white racism.

Clearly the court system agreed with this sentiment as he was later released as a part of some white conspiracy to jail him of his innocence.

You’re just being annoying at this point. I have nothing further to add.

1 Like

That sounds racist.

You’ll survive.

1 Like

Sounds like something a racist would say.

The greatest insight we can derive from your post is not one you would imagine, for even those of The Every Species Syndicate are racists.

What we observe instead is how you felt the insatiable urge to protest the fact that i said ‘man’ instead of ‘man and woman’, even as trivial as this is. AS IF i only meant the males and not the females of the species.

It’s your essence peeking through again, that singular motivating force that directs everything you do and say at a forum; the spirit of revenge, resentment against the well turned out, the confident, those with an abundance of pride and self respect. This time, the stronger one must be a misogynist… i better smack him with my ruler.

Breaking them down, making them christian, and in doing this, you can play the role of the oppressor to avenge yourself of the oppression of a world too hostile for you to bear.

Racism is too ugly a truth. I refuse to accept it. That there is no ‘god’ or natural law or philosophical argument that can stop all the paraphilias in the world is also too ugly a truth. I refuse to accept it.

I would say you are a great danger to everyone here if they weren’t already as sick as you (with their own philosophical confusions).

1 Like

If it was that, I would have called man a subset of the species woman, as you did reversely. I’m not a feminazi.

You’re a mascunazi. Prolly why you’re so horrible to your mom.

So, racism can only end when all the white people are dead, correct?

This is the dumbest question asked on the Forum.
If you think racism is a problem.
Why?
WHen you have answered that then ask your self your own question agaiin.

I used an example at the beginning of this thread, try rereading it and then get back to me in response.

A white child was born today. What racism has she perpetrated?


If I may be so bold: your actual critique is of so-called ‘anti-white racism’, and instead of coming out with it you are presenting the reductio of what you’re objecting too. Original and amusing.

State your position explicitly; sarcasm is effective kindling, but bad fuel.

I don’t know, some have said if we got rid of white reproduction entirely we would eventually destroy racism overtime, that child will eventually become a future racist as a white little Hitler born. If Hitler wasn’t born we wouldn’t have had Hitlerism. I am simply a mirror reflecting the entire world around me, this is the dominant view of the anti racist crowd, that all inherent whiteness must be destroyed everywhere. I am merely asking questions trying to reach a philosophical or political consensus on the subject material. No need for sarcasm, existence is absurd enough, especially the current one we all live in.

What you’re describing is significantly different from my impression of “the dominant view of the anti racist crowd”. How much of “the anti racist crowd” do you read? Do you read primary sources in full, or snippets selected by people who share your biases (or worse: snippets paraphrased by people who share your biases)? Is it a representative sample?

What book-length treatments of anti-racism have you read?

To say it explicitly: You don’t know what their dominant views are, because you haven’t read what they’ve written about their views.

1 Like

How do you know what I have read or what kinds of individuals I have listened to? Sounds very presumptuous of you to make such declarations. I could ask you the same questions, of course unlike you I don’t see the necessity of doing so. I of course would like to listen to your views if you feel like sharing them.

Though I admit I presume, and acknowledge that I could be mistaken, I don’t think I’m being presumptuous. But I am satisfied that you know whether or not I’m right.

  1. Yes, it is racist.
  2. That it is racist would be the dominant view of the anti racist crowd.

Well, the only person who knows me well is myself. Thanks for the satisfying but also very self evident statement that nobody knows me better than myself, I guess.

  1. It’s racist.

  2. The goal of anti racism is to destroy whiteness where white people are not allowed to have an individual or collective sense of self identity because it is inherently racist.

Well, both of these can’t be correct, can they? Seems to be some various contradictions in these lines of thought.