From what I have heard from overseas British the expatriate is intentional to escape what is otherwise the modern totalitarian Great Britain where you need a license for owning a simple cable television set.
Wait… that’s actually a thing… what the shit is this…?
Imagine how shite the world would be if the UK won the 1775 war…
The first inventor of the aeroplane was not Wilbur Wright but some guy from India, you didn’t hear about it since India was a British colony at the time…
What race is Obama? What race is Tiger woods? What race is Keanu Reeves?
Windmills man. I didn’t say it’s determined by dress/speech/context, I said it depends.
60 years ago Chinese and Japanese people would have been treated as the same people, but in China and Japan they did not see it that way.
This is real, and it is racist. Rural/redstate/working class white people play the same role on parts of the left that black and brown immigrant laborers play on part of the right.
I’m not an insider, I don’t work in politics or even have any connections in politics.
Whatever their motivation, they do in fact help the very poor (e.g. welfare, food stamps, Head Start, etc.), at least relative to the Republicans. But to be clear, I think it’s often at the expense of the working class.
Woah woah woah – Obama is a relatively conservative Democrat. He was never a modern woke anti-racism Democrat, and the neoliberal part of the party liked him because he was a neoliberal whose story played to the left.
Obama made things worse because a lot of the US electorate (and a lot of the ruling class) is actually racist and can’t see Obama as anything other than a black man, and were galled that black man should be president.
First, the “far left controlled MSM” doesn’t exist, look at the ownership of the most watched TV news stations and their political contributions.
But even if we treat CNN and MSNBC as left-pandering, the right-pandering Fox talked about race (and trans issues) much, much more than either of them. The right pushes race narratives because they help the right.
Yes, it is still true during a recession.
I said labor sellers selfishly want a smaller labor pool. I’d still argue the net effect is positive for most laborers, because the effect of competition on their wages is offset by the effect of additional demand and the decrease in costs (because labor sellers also buy labor).
I’m not avoid it, I hadn’t considered it. Do you have a source? My first thought is that laborers who compete with immigrants would tend to be less able to move up in relative rank, but that that their material wealth increases faster than in the counterfactual where there is no immigration.
But again, the solution is not to punish immigrants, whose wealth and economic mobility also matter, it’s to tax the additional wealth added to the economy and redistribute it to those poor people.
This belief is based on the fallacy that immigrants are a net drain on society, and that isn’t true. They are net contributors to societal wealth.
Nor does immigration have anything to do with taking care of the poor. If social programs for the poor are underfunded, we could increase funding for them by taxing the wealthy. US per capita GDP has more than doubled in the past 20 years, we can afford it.
Then it is a good thing that facts don’t depend on who’s speaking them.
Race mixing is evidence that races do exist.
They evolved before there were human societies to “fabricate them”, according to the current mythology.
The fact that you may not be able to discern a bonobo from a chimpanzee, or an Asian from an African elephant, does not mean that they are not distinct sub-species.
Mixing a wolf and a coyote does not prove that they were never distinct species.
We can say that the product of such mixing dilutes their naturally selected advantages.
What race and ethnicity is Obama? Mixed of two or more races I believe. Pretty much common knowledge.
Foreign labor increases the profits of corporate entities like shareholders, CEOS, and such, sure, you could make that argument. Take Tyson Foods for instance, they faced a lot of budget cuts and decided to cut their labor force in half. Afterwards they decided to cater to a foreign workforce in the meat industry because why pay a local domestic worker $25.00 an hour when you can hire a foreign worker for $16.00
So, yeah, foreign workers are great for corporations and capitalists, but terrible for the local domestic worker.
I shouldn’t have to remind you that the stock market and general economy are not the same thing, but you’re a capitalistic neoliberal, what do you care? According to people like you it’s all the same thing.
Also, I would say about half of the foreign workers here send a lot of that money back to their families overseas, so not of all of those dollars are spent inside the nation domestically but instead are spent elsewhere in the world. A lot of times they’ll save up money here, move back to Mexico or wherever buying up apartments, ranches, and hotels in their native homeland. Again, the money is not spent here domestically.
Also, if you want an economic, financial, and labor market debate the next step is, who pays more taxes, the citizen or illegal migrant? Care to take a guess?
Sometime I will have to tell you about the years I lived in the wilderness as a mountain man off and on again. Very humbling experience living in the wilderness for many years at a time. Humbling also because there were others I encountered out there doing the same exact thing and in some cases much better than myself.
Useful idiots can be found in every political revolution throughout history, in that regard the U.S.S.R was not unique. In every war, conflict, or political antagonism the pawns are always expendable first.
Just because I hate neoliberals doesn’t mean I like neoconservatives either, I hate both groups of modern politics, I only find neoconservatives slightly less annoying than neoliberals, but still annoying nonetheless. I despise both political factions equally.
All internet jokes and memes aside of Jordan Peterson cleaning your room and washing your penis, if that’s the highest intellectual Canada has to offer in the public spotlight Canadians are screwed. The guy is unhinged, when he is not popping Percocets in a drug addiction he is on live air crying because some New York City Jews called him Rabbi.
Of course he like the neoconservatives are completely controlled opposition of the capitalists, both neoliberals and neoconservatives share that same trait in common.
Don’t tread on me new wave conservative libertarianism? More like tread on me harder, as libertarians give corporations, capitalists, and private entities free reign over everything.
No. They want to cut wages. There was plenty of labour.
And yes, in Holland a concerted effort was made to import people from Morocco and Turkey specifically. That was organized by our government, not by the Turks and Moroccans.
Same thing, but far cruder, happened under your governments. People were imported like cattle.
Obama is obviously black, makes a huge deal about it too. Tiger woods is black too. Could be some mix too but no one denied that mixes exist. Keanu is mixed white and Native American it seems. Whats your point? None of these people would like what you’re implying, that their ancestry is meaningless.
Lol. So give me an example of a white skinned man who is actually black.
My statement is that you and your moral type try to deprive humans of something vital; the significance of their roots. I actually agree that strength is in diversity, or at least, that there can be strength in that - but diversity actually requires that people hold on to their roots, that different types are affirmed as different.
While I support racial and ethnic cultural identity of white Europeans I will never ever embrace racial eugenic ideology that somehow one race or ethnicity is superior over the other. It’s not something I believe in or advocate for at all.
I myself am a white man of European stock and what I witness is that western civilization is in serious decline because of cancerous greed along with our addiction to general consumption. This cancerous greed is so bad concerning our collective racial compulsion towards hedonistic materialism that we have the need to import foreign workers by the millions every single year just to feed that addictive compulsion. That compulsion makes us very weak, not stronger, and having this collective psychological disease in no way makes us superior racially over others whatsoever. A so called superior race or ethnicity wouldn’t act in such a way, that right there would tell you that line of thinking is all purely bullshit.
Likewise I think it is possible to live with in cooperation with other races and ethnicities since there’s so many of them in the west already through no fault of our own, but that also different racial or ethnic independent locales, neighborhoods, and regions isn’t necessarily such a bad thing. Different independent ethnic and racial neighborhoods are a good thing in respecting diversity of one another. We can all have our different established independent ethnic neighborhoods, regions, and enclaves but still work together in cooperation for our nation concerning common goals. Common goals that all different races and ethnicities share in common that would incentivize us to work together.
To do that however we need to root out all racial or ethnic divisions wherever they come from to where all people are respected equally including white European Americans. But to have that this means no exclusion of anybody, and I seriously mean anyone. This is why I am against neoliberalism so much because it is the root of so many antagonisms whether it be racial, sexual, economic class, education, or occupation. For me there can be no progressive socialist society, nation, or economy so long as it exists [neoliberalism] as a divisive antagonizer. Likewise I feel the same about neoconservatism with its gravitation towards economic capitalism, it too needs to be rooted out.
Also, I believe in a socialist purely national communist economy where foreign mass migration or immigration is completely unnecessary where it should be heavily regulated drawn to a halt. Foreign immigration in small numbers is fine but nothing like the unlimited kind we have today at present time. In a socialist economic system the worker receives adequate wages to live good and well, there’s no need of constant endless surplus labor, where instead you have a newly revitalized domestic workforce native overtime to the nation it exists in. All of that for me would be ideal.
For me this is the best possible future world I believe in, it is either something like that, or it will unfortunately be some kind of extremely violent future fascist state of constant total racial or ethnic civil war through balkanization. I hope we can avoid such a terrible future state, we’ll see overtime. The future promises nothing to anyone.
I think my idea of all ethnicities or races working together under a communist political system but where at the same time everybody is respected equally is a fair one.
It’s because the white liberal especially the urban ones sees themselves as being superior over their working class and rural white counterparts. That’s why we have terms like white trash, rednecks, country bumpkin, and so on. They really do have a superiority complex about themselves.
It’s also funny when they act patronizing or condescending towards nonwhites as well. Again, another form of superiority complex.
Yeah, back when I argued with libs and tried to change their minds (I don’t do that anymore, waste of time) I would dare them to go into a black or latino neighborhood and talk that shit about how “race is just a social construct”, and see what happens.
With what denominator? Immigrants earn less than natives, so even if they were taxed at a constant percent they would pay less per capita.
At the same level of earning, though, I believe they pay the same taxes, and they definitely use much less in services. Here’s a report from 2023 making the case that on net immigrants contribute more than natives (caveat: Cato).
Rural/redstate/working class whites (as a generalization on southern whites) are to the left as black and brown immigrants are to the right, in the sense that both are race+class+culture scapegoats, and they serve to distract parts of the left/right that have a lot more interests in common with those groups, in particular economic interests. Instead, they focus their efforts on ensuring that those scapegoats are punished, preventing the formation of a significant coalition that could be powerful enough to actually get economic changes that would benefit them.
It’s not about whether there’s enough labor, it’s that more labor is expected to reduce the price of labor (i.e. cut wages).
He doesn’t though. He hardly ever talked about being black. The right wing talked about it all the time, and every time he did mention it they repeated it for cycle after cycle to make it seem like it’s all he talked about.
It’s the same thing with trans shit now. The left talks about it much less than the right.
My point is that Obama and Tiger woods are both mixed race, but they’re assigned a singular race. Genetically, Obama is no more black than he is white; socially, he’s black, “obviously”. Because race isn’t about ancestry, it’s about various implicit social rules and assumptions, like that ‘one drop’ of African blood contaminates someone and makes them black. Keanu is white because native Hawaiian is an uncommon enough ancestry that it gets ignored; we just see a white guy because native Hawaiian isn’t a racial category.
The race we perceive depends on a lot of things that aren’t ancestry or aesthetics.
“My identity might begin with the fact of my race, but it didn’t, couldn’t end there.
At least that’s what I would choose to believe.”
― Barack Obama, [Dreams from My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance]
He ran on it.
Contaminates? Now who is the racist?
I keep saying people are proud of their ancestry, and rightly so.
No, he’s a mix. And you’re changing your position.
You said it had to do with things like behavior and clothing.