Well, the global consequences unwinding now are the greatest or most damaging they have ever been compared to past history. The collapse of societies globally I see coming eventually their whining of victim hood will do them no good, there will be nothing there to hear them or cater to them once the deluge of global chaos finally arrives that will pretty much engulf everything. Whether it is another world war, global economic crisis, or just the general break down of modern society all at once, none of it will really matter all that much in the aftermath.
In times of distress the true spirit is revealed.
Masks fail to conceal the face of the one in panic - pretences fail.
Now, that the host is dying, the parasite is in a state of panic… looking for a new host to infest.
See Gaad Sad…on Twitter.
They sell anti-racism and practice the most brutal form of superiority, ethical, ideological superiority…apartheid…
Spiritual superiority. Feminine superiority.
Females compete over which one is the most “pure”.
They promote anti-tribalism and practice nepotism, and spiritual uniformity.
They shame Europe to open up its borders, and close their own tighter.
That is hypocrisy…and now all but the most obtuse can see it.
Plenty of them on ILP.
They don’t want us to see the patterns…so they want to dumb-us down.
Even racial patterns in crime statistics…and in academics and athletics.
Where does this lie that race is a social construct lead?
To civil unrest and destruction…to Civil War.
I mean, if you convince a gullible, naive, moron, that humanity has no sub-categories, then the only source of human disparity is social…right?
But it isn’t…so no matter what you do disparity continues along racial/ethnic lines…and so what is the concussion for a degenerate who cannot doubt his own starting premise?
Systemic racism…occult racism…
1 Like
Back to the subject at hand in this current thread.
Do white people have a right to exist?
Do white people have a right to have their own independent nations or societies?
Do white people have any right or ability to be discriminating concerning their own individual and collective preferences?
Do white people have a right in the business atmosphere to have preferences towards their own race?
Do white people have the right to have their own neighborhoods?
Do white people have the right to have their own system of governance?
Do white people have the right to their own identity and self determination?
Of course, in this context when we say white people we mean white European peoples racially and ethnically.
Now, if your answer is to all of those questions is no, is it then moral or ethical that all white people should be wiped off the face of the earth, as many have said that white people are inherently or inexplicably racist? If you had to choose one stance over the other, which one would it be?
The neoliberal attitude, more importantly the white European neoliberal attitude towards race and ethnicity is a simple one to mentally grasp:
“My race and ethnicity is inherently bad, evil, or corrupted. I must purge myself of racism which is my original sin I have been born with that I am burdened with carrying everywhere, I must atone for this sin as a part of active penance by destroying my own whiteness. Anything that destroys my whiteness or the whiteness of others is a good thing that I must morally support no matter what. I will model my entire life, social relationships, and day to day activities actively in the pursuit of destroying my own whiteness. People of color everywhere are the oppressed as a part of some great white male grand conspiracy and so in order to fight that I must support people of color everywhere at the expense of my own inherently evil whiteness or the whiteness of others. Racial or ethnic mass suicide is the highest virtue.”
1 Like
Lol, damn bro… well said.
I will certainly agree with you in terms of some or probably even most females. I have been fortunate to know one or two examples that disprove the rule.
I would also add that some or perhaps even most males would also fall into the category of “would be happy and not care because they otherwise don’t think about the future long term or much of anything very deeply.” Today, most people live in the moment for pleasure and security. Thought to the future, moral or philosophical issues or even just concern genuinely for other people than oneself is rare.
1 Like
Ironically, the least racist places on earth are white European societies. Go just about anywhere on earth and you will encounter people who are actually racist.
Racism is the norm on planet earth, even today. Blacks in Africa are racist against other blacks in Africa due to being from different ethnic sub-groups and regions, hence why there are 10 million black people in actual slavery today in African… black slaves enslaved by other black people.
1 Like
I don’t recall ever seeing any BLM marches in support of freeing the 10 million black slaves in Africa. Do you?
1 Like
I’m not sure.
I feel we are owed a more in-depth explanation of these percentages.
At the very least, genetics in context to what? 70% in relation to humans or just life on earth?
Genetic influence on what? Musical preference, job proclivity, political opinion? Idk
Genetics is an inheritance of the range you may or may not achieve.
You inherit how tall you can become, or how smart you can become.
Species is about inherited ranges of potentials, so sub-species is also an inherited range.
Nurturing, environmental factors, will, is what determine how much of it you may attain.
To put it another way…nature is the sum total of nurturing, the choices your ancestors made, passed onto you…as a determined immutable fact.
How you adapt them to the present, is all you…and this will be passed on to your offspring.
So, the nature nurture debate is bullshyte.
Can you nurture yourself out of your nurture?
Can you nurture yourself to not be of a particular species or race?
No.
A lifetime of nurturing cannot erase generations of nurturing = nature.
You may cultivate a higher degree of your potentials so that you can dominate someone with a higher potential he has not cultivated fully…but that’s another issue.
You sound like Adam blaming Eve for humanity’s downfall. I guess it’s in the genes.
Where have I blamed women, dumbass?
You think that it is a woman’s sexual power being removed from male control that is responsible for the male problems…
Could it be that it is the male problems that motivated women to remove control from them?
Female are genetic and memetic filters. Males dominate them, adjusting their filters in accordance with their ideals.
Women have always been a means, for men.
In modernity the institution monopolizes and abstract the masculine role or protector provider…dominating all females and most effete males.
It converts female into its ideological (memetic) filters, keeping undesirable male attributes out fo its gene pool.
Just like the Abrahamic institutions converted simple females, like this one, into its dogmatic, filtering system.
Modern, Americanised, women believe they are free from paternalism, liberated and strong…and all they’ve done is replaced one form of paternalism for another…more abstract, nihilistic, form.
They feel empowered because the system, through its institutions, is protecting and providing for them…giving them the false sense of being equal to biological males.
God of Abraham, was the original abstraction and institutionalization of masculinity.
The big cock in the metaphysical realm - Platonic dick - making all women swoon.
You do gotta admit Jesus is pretty badass for talking to women in public when it was taboo, having women disciples, never once violating their consent. You do gotta admit, too, Paul followed in his badass footsteps and said there is no Jew or Greek or male or female because all are one in Christ Jesus. That the husband and his wife should equally respect each other’s consent. so on and so forth. Why would any man have a problem with that unless they had an inferiority complex?
Meaningless lables.
Have you been to any of those places even?
1 Like
Who said it’s controversial? I said all human cultures have plenty in common, and that’s true. Is it controversial to say so?
Two cultures that have more in common with each other than they have in common with other cultures are still two cultures.
Here is a 2019 profile of Ibram X. Kendi that relates how, “he realized judging white people as a group is as racist as judging black people as a group.”
This is a red herring. One source of oppression applying equally doesn’t have anything to do with whether another source of oppression applies unequally.
Gravity has oppressed every human who’s ever lived, but some of them were also treated like property.
What do you mean by a “white racial identity”? What are you identifying with? In what sense does it structure your life of shape your self-conception? Are you just saying you get sunburns? Complete this sentence: “I identify as white, which means I ______.”
And there’s no such thing as a “white ethnic identity”. White is not an ethnicity.
Males once dominated females in history’s past, now females dominate males in the post modern current era possessing sexual power something of which not many men have as most men have other forms of power they exchange for a woman’s sexual power. (The female being exploitative sexually capitalist exchanging for a male’s labor if she can’t labor enough for herself. )
There’s something feminine about human civilization that caters to the female psyche, wants, and desires that strips against the more natural primal instinctual male. This seems to be very much the case as civilization advances technologically. Probably something to do with making the physical labor of men obsolete.
I prefer those labels to the disingenuous bland label of American.
It’s not females that dominate…it is this dogma, using females to dominate males.
Females are always a means.
Americanism is the most modern variant of an ancient parasite.
1 Like
Sure, females dominate ideologically in post modern society as they could never do so by any other means.