Is taking to people on the internet pointless ? And finally why is it easier to stay home instead of going outside ?
1 Like
Well, when a man masturbates, he points at somewhere. You cannot call this pointless.
For the other two, it is a matter of preference.
1 Like
Is a ballpoint pen without a tip considered pointless?
1 Like
Is masturbating pointless?
Is taking to people on the internet pointless ?
This really does lead to the question: how do you see mastubating as like talking to people on the internet and is even this thread a sexual experience for you?
1 Like
Well, it sounds like either unprocessed trauma or depression or both. Drugs alone are unlikely to shift things.
2 Likes
Only when the inc drys out.
1 Like
No I put them not because I view them both sexually but because I view them as both something that doesn’t change my life or the environment that I’m currently living in that’s what they have in common they are a distraction.
2 Likes
In fact it is pointed towards making the point that self fulfillment is very pleasurable, it is a shaker and a mover by those not acquainted with the two facets of tragedy
It becomes contested vision of unexpressed saving and its real counter to unequivocally bring about huge energy moves, which can wield a power through a manageable restraint as Wagner and Kierkegaard sided with Suckrates: ( the point aims to salvage that invisible form, the idol, from becoming sheer idolatry-understandably hard to cum across so hardened by stoic cynicism)
So la vie!
[ after all, civilization my be much more discontented, if not that defaulted option availability: signs of sub conscious may manifest later innlife beyond the age of reason]
1 Like
It’s only pointless talking to people if you think it is pointless.
I have learned a lot talking to people on the internet over the years.
Hi Authority:
Just on off the cuff remark? Yes, you can, and at the same time one could miss essential points if the emphasis to learning shifts toward that form of communication.
1 Like
For instance and this will further demean the already stance with which to support the thesis here, or support it’s far flung link,
Vying the notion with which it has been contra indicated for a long time, albeit selectively, that consists of the matter of the mental healt -sexual orientation of Jesus. The point being made here is the denouncement of such links, which immediately sever Jesus’ links to the Author of such schema, and bring up the idea of a developed man-GOD.
These ideas prove only the non existent linear relationship, and not that consistent with logarhytmically c interpretations among factors subsisting in the Holy Trinity. One can not imagine a Neo classical view, as supported by the neoclassical pastor and philosopher St. Augustine.