Is war bad?

Is war bad

  • Yes
  • No
0 voters

I think war is bad but what can we do about facism?

same thing as you do with socialists and communists…

kill 'em all

-Imp

This isn’t a black and white question, so I can’t answer yes or no.

While war may be bad, there are times when it is necessary. And no, I’m not talking about Iraq.

Hello

War does have a good side. Like…

WWII was horrible but wasn’t there some depression that America was pulled out of by WWII?

Huh? You mean socialist and communitst kill everybody or to kill all socialist and communists?

EZ$

exactly… kill all totalitarians- especially the communists and socialists…

-Imp

While socialist and communist totalitarians do exist, it does not necessarily follow that socialists, or communists for that matter, are totalitarians.

Also, there is such a thing as capitalist totalitarians…

-Imp

But i think communism is how underdeveloped countries become organized and developed.

no, that is how they are corrupted…

-Imp

Really…

[b]Democratic socialism is a broad political movement propagating the ideals of socialism within the context of a democratic system. In many cases, its adherents promote the ideal of socialism as an evolutionary process resulting from legislation enacted by a parliamentary democracy. Other democratic socialists favor a revolutionary approach that seeks to establish socialism by creating a non-parliamentary democratic system, usually based on workers’ councils or similar organizations.

Many of those who describe themselves as “socialists” often argue that socialism necessarily implies democracy, thus making “democratic socialism” a redundant term. The fact that one specific movement is called Democratic Socialism does not mean that other branches of socialism must be any less democratic.[/b]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_socialism

name the specific state you describe

it doesn’t exist.

-Imp

Oh now we have gone from specific people to specific states?

My point was that not all socialists are totalitarian. I already proved my point.

you have only proven that they do not exist

-Imp

Whetever Imp, you claimed that all socialists were also totalitarians; not that all “socialist” states have been totalitarian. You were proven wrong.

you never produced a socialist that wasn’t a totalitarian.

you proved nothing

-Imp

Yes he did… at least I think

Hey Imp show me a picture of the currency from <insert the most obscure country you can think of with it’s own currency>. can’t find a pic? that’s ok… I know it’s out there.

Apparently you didn’t read the wiki article:

List of Democratic Socialist parties

The following political parties are either democratic socialist in themselves, social democratic parties with significant numbers of democratic socialist members, or other left-wing parties with democratic socialist members:

* Party of European Socialists, European Union
      o Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands (SPD), Germany
      o Labour Party, UK
      o Parti Socialiste, France
      o Parti Socialiste, Belgium
      o Labour party, Ireland
* European United Left - Nordic Green Left, European Union
      o Left Party, Sweden
      o European Left, European Union
            + Party of Democratic Socialism (PDS), Germany
* Samajwadi Party, India
* Democratic Socialist Party, Japan
* New Democratic Party, Canada
* Union des forces progressistes, Quebec (Canada)
* Democratic Socialists of America, USA
* Socialist Party USA, USA
      o Debs Tendency, USA (A group within the Socialist Party USA which support revolutionary socialism)
* Australian Labor Party, Australia
* Movement for the Fifth Republic, Venezuela
* Partido Independentista Puertorriqueño, Puerto Rico

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic … st_parties

“Totalitarian regimes mobilize entire populations in support of the state and a political ideology, and do not tolerate activities by individuals or groups such as labor unions, churches and political parties that are not directed toward the state’s goals.”

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Totalitarianism

you still haven’t produced a socialist that wasn’t a totalitarian.

-Imp

Me

next question?

Which is exactly what makes a totalitarian, a totalitarian.

Plently of socialists “tolerate activities by individuals or groups such as labor unions, churches and political parties that are not directed toward the state’s goals.”