Yes, being funny is my job, but my job ethic has limits, moreover, I often have vacations.
_
I quite like the autonomy and freedoms my non-group isolation gives me…
…tho only 95% of the time, and not all 100% of the time… so not wholly antisocial.
_
I quite like the autonomy and freedoms my non-group isolation gives me……tho only 95% of the time, and not all 100% of the time… so not wholly antisocial.
But you are 95% antisocial then - according to your own words. … Nice.
MagsJ:_
I quite like the autonomy and freedoms my non-group isolation gives me……tho only 95% of the time, and not all 100% of the time… so not wholly antisocial.
But you are 95% antisocial then - according to your own words. … Nice.
The 5% is the percentage of me that wants to go Out Out, every-so-often.
Sometimes I fulfil the want, but more often-than-not, I don’t.
Duties and responsibilities are not the same as not having freedoms as long as you have chosen them yourself. You are not more free than a busy working mother or a lawyer working 16 hours a day just because you sit in your house, talking to your cats or whatever…if that were the case then the prisoners who do nothing but lay on their asses and smell their farts would be the most free people in our society. Not taking up investments and not making choices that cut your choices also demands an investment and also cuts your choices; a man who has a whole day to himself has neither a job or a family and is paying the consequences for his choices as much as a man who has a job and a family but does not have a whole day to himself. Freedom is not anarchy and wild and lazy trifling about, doing as you please without taking into account others around you…A man who refuses to co-operate with his fellow countrymen and neighbors is definitely less free than a man who constrains himself and does cooperate. Look at an idiot kook like Satyr…what is he free to do?walk between his living room and the toilet and spout shit on the internet and see his son on the weekends???thats freedom???that has nothing to do with freedom, freedom is a precondition, not a condition.
Otto: MagsJ:_
I quite like the autonomy and freedoms my non-group isolation gives me……tho only 95% of the time, and not all 100% of the time… so not wholly antisocial.
But you are 95% antisocial then - according to your own words. … Nice.
The 5% is the percentage of me that wants to go Out Out, every-so-often.
Sometimes I fulfil the want, but more often-than-not, I don’t.
Do you think then that you are isolated?
MagsJ: Otto:[b]MagsJ said: “I quite like the autonomy and freedoms my non-group isolation gives me…
…tho only 95% of the time, and not all 100% of the time… so not wholly antisocial”.[/b]
But you are 95% antisocial then - according to your own words. … Nice.
The 5% is the percentage of me that wants to go Out Out, every-so-often.
Sometimes I fulfil the want, but more often-than-not, I don’t.
Do you think then that you are isolated?
Isolated from others in this Webforum… mostly so. However, who knows if One has or has not crossed paths with Another… or Three, from ILP.
…but what does it all mean??? to you…?
Duties and responsibilities are not the same as not having freedoms as long as you have chosen them yourself. You are not more free than a busy working mother or a lawyer working 16 hours a day just because you sit in your house, talking to your cats or whatever…if that were the case then the prisoners who do nothing but lay on their asses and smell their farts would be the most free people in our society. Not taking up investments and not making choices that cut your choices also demands an investment and also cuts your choices; a man who has a whole day to himself has neither a job or a family and is paying the consequences for his choices as much as a man who has a job and a family but does not have a whole day to himself. Freedom is not anarchy and wild and lazy trifling about. A man who refuses to co-operate with his fellow countrymen and neighbors is definitely less free than a man who constrains himself and does cooperate. Look at an idiot kook like Satyr…what is he free to do?walk between his living room and the toilet and spout shit on the internet???thats freedom???
Can you give me something less rambling and less presumptuous to reply to… I’d appreciate that very much.
You are a pretentious dullard, is this less rambling and presemptous(although you use this word wrong)?
You are a pretentious dullard, is this less rambling and presemptous(although you use this word wrong)?
…and yet you posted nothing on-topic, to counterbalance the off-topic?
No, I used the word (presumptuous) correctly… and you are also a flaming troll.
Speaking your mind honestly is not trolling you kook…why don’t you ask SATIRE what his opinion on brown, mixed-race individuals is??? will he troll you or will he wax you and lie straight in your face??? you pretentious nit-wit, he is my step-dad, don’t you dare marry him now…I dont want you as my mommy!!!
Speaking your mind honestly is not trolling you kook…why don’t you ask SATIRE what his opinion on brown, mixed-race individuals is???
You seem to think that he and I have never spoke or crossed paths before… Other’s beliefs and opinions are their’s to have… as are mine.
will he troll you or will he wax you and lie straight in your face??? you pretentious nit-wit, he is my step-dad, don’t you dare marry him now…I dont want you as my mommy!!!
The only one trolling me, is you.
I know SATIRE is a lying atheistic Canadian kook.
A person named “Satire”? Nice.
Is this peron isolated?
A person named “Satire”? Nice.
It’s actually Satyr… tho probably that kind of Satire too.
Is this peron isolated?
From what he’s said… Yes.
Why are you so curious about others’ isolation affairs?
Otto:A person named “Satire”? Nice.
It’s actually Satyr… tho probably that kind of Satire too.
Satyr? Is he really alive?
Is this person isolated?
From what he’s said… Yes.
Why are you so curious about others’ isolation affairs?
Did you not read the title of this thread? This thread is about isolation! If someone is isolated in this webforum (or in real life - like this Satyr, if he is really alive), then I am exactly the right contact person. I am both an isolator and a de-isolator. I force into isolation and I free from isolation - depending on what my “customers” want.
Satyr? Is he really alive?
He seems legit!
Why are you so curious about others’ isolation affairs?
Did you not read the title of this thread? This thread is about isolation! If someone is isolated in this webforum (or in real life - like this Satyr, if he is really alive), then I am exactly the right contact person. I am both an isolator and a de-isolator. I force into isolation and I free from isolation - depending on what my “customers” want.
I am now less perplexed, thank you… the sixth stage of Erik Erikson’s theory of psychosocial development.
I am not isolated in my group, but my group knows that it is isolated and does not want to isolate anyone.
I am not isolated in my group, but my group knows that it is isolated and does not want to isolate anyone.
A clear case. You belong to group II.
Look:
Do you think that you could be isolated in this webforum?
You could belong to one of these four groups:
I) An isolated group that knows about its isolation and wants to drive others into isolation.
II) An isolated group that knows about its isolation and does not want to drive others into isolation.
III) An isolated group that does not know about its isolation and wants to drive others into isolation.
IV) An isolated group that does not know about its isolation and does not want to drive others into isolation.Feel free to come out of the closet.
Please copy the following depiction, fill in your position within one of the four groups and post it.
Thank you.
Otto, the question raised is an interestING one, but is the form of trolling that begs the question.
In all fairness, the categories raised, may include more closetedly subtle yet unperceived sub questions,
Such as motive and the degree of hiddennes appropriate to more general inquiries raised, become less reductive accordingly.
Some of the most prior and subtextual hiddennes at certain levels could, or should not be answered either, even if compelled for some reason