Some excerpts from the first page of this thread with the honorable name “James S. Saint” as the title:
…
…
It’s not such a typical page of a typical ILP thread, is it?
It’s kinder, friendlier, gentler, more honorable, more reflective, more contemplative, more likeable (and at the end also a bit funnier) than the overwhelming majority of all ILP threads.
One of the people wth whom he was in contact was @Mithus, and she told me that the contact broke off so suddenly that she assumed he had died. He was, after all, quite old.
Damn.. really? He taught me a lot, I recognized that as I grew in life and when I came back here that a lot of my views that he criticized, helped me reform them into stronger and more logical views. I wish I had the chance to talk with him again. Him and phyllo both honestly.. I remember my days as an atheist and hardcore liberal utopia encourager, coming on here and trying to explain what I wanted and they picked apart all of my arguments, it honestly helped me see more clearly.
The people who pick apart our arguments, do so I think, ultimately, because they care.. I think that is what philosophy truly is at its essence and what we’re doing, the people who truly care and they care so much that they take the time to point out the others flaws in reasoning, so that they can better themselves.
RIP Saint James, I’ll always remember you and how you contributed to shaping me, even when we disagreed in my early philosophical days. I never got the chance to thank him personally for contributing in opening my eyes and mind.
Do you equate metaphysics with faith/consent? Faith/consent is not in conflict with reason.
For example… reason is in our nature… so any explanation of nature must include creativity, as reason is how we can go with/against the flow/natural on purpose.