Stop talking.
HAhahahahahahahaha.
While Ichghthas reads.
There’s some rumor that we can’t perceive the present unless we have a simulated past or future. Everything we do changes our pasts and futures. The present can’t exist without them.
Welcome to the boards.
You didn’t answer at all, just avoided the question like in this thread.
That is not a counterargument.
I need a argument to counter.
Challenge my definition and show me how it is a contradiction.
Yes…
If all selves are others and all others are selves, do you have a better copula than the =?
You are using “are” disingenuously.
This is patent if I reformulate as:
If all selves=others and all others=selves, do you have a better copula than the =?
= means “equals” or “is the same as,” which is not the same as “is.”
A dog is brown, but a dog does not equal brown, or is the same as brown.
I am still not understanding/seeing the contradiction.
Do you have another word for this than making every self/other an identical self … like more identical than identical twins.
And what would be the symbol for that word?
Here I explain it.
That is your misunderstanding but you don’t explain how I should phrase it so that I can prevent misunderstanding.
MAybe you have to abandon the symbolism you have been using, and settle for something less asthetically pleasing but less philosophically insulting, like;
every self is another self to another self.
Self=other would be like making sky=clouds the basis of everything you say, what you hang everything on.
That is what I said. And what alternative symbol would you suggest?