And now you’re admitting you have a little eye!
My little guy’s little eye is bigger than most men’s biggest lie.
Still though, as a reminder:
One Being (in three persons), many beings (in Being’s image).
This is not exactly a newsflash.
What it is exactly is a nonsensical nonanswer to a very simply noted contradiction which invalidates an entire insane structure:
Ichthus77:a self recognizing the other as another self,
How can there be another self if self=other? Wouldn’t it all just be one self? One’s self?
Creepy.
OK yeah whatever and divine sovereignty totally contradicts free will.
I don’t know about any of what your saying, but I know that this:
Ichthus77:a self recognizing the other as another self,
How can there be another self if self=other? Wouldn’t it all just be one self? One’s self?
Creepy.
is an obvious contradiction.
I have probably addressed that very criticism 500,000 times on this board.
I doubt it.
Once again, for the folks in the stands:
Ichthus77:a self recognizing the other as another self,
How can there be another self if self=other? Wouldn’t it all just be one self? One’s self?
Creepy.
Makes sense.
In the face of such an obvious contradiction that lies at the very foundation of what I spend hours upon hours babbling about, which has no resolution but admission,
I would post silly emoticons too.
meh. I’m just gonna read a book.
You do that.
Fine.
No shame in it.
Stop talking.
HAhahahahahahahaha.
Ichthus77:a self recognizing the other as another self,
How can there be another self if self=other? Wouldn’t it all just be one self? One’s self?
Creepy.
While Ichghthas reads.
There’s some rumor that we can’t perceive the present unless we have a simulated past or future. Everything we do changes our pasts and futures. The present can’t exist without them.
Welcome to the boards.
How can there be another self if self=other? Wouldn’t it all just be one self? One’s self?
Final answer: Double-Edged Golden Rule (self=other) - #12 by Ichthus77