now you are on ignore, I can’t see your posts.
That’s a shame….how will you learn about representation of reality (non illusionary) science now?
You have slithered back into the shadows you mean.
Lavender’s and Jupiter’s psychoses can easily be explained within typical indirect realism: there is an objective reality out there, and our brains/minds construct this representation that we experience, using some input from that external world. The representation is usually highly reliable, it highly correlates with the external world. And contents within the representation usually don’t get all mixed up.
But sometimes the representation is built quite incorrectly, and people begin to hallucinate, or become convinced that Taylor Swift is out to get them, or that NN NS SN SS solves every question humanity ever had and thet everyone else is wrong about everything etc.
Under Kant, psychosis is harder to explain, because you don’t have any access to an external world, maybe there isn’t even one. So then on what basis will you decide, what is real and what isn’t? Maybe you could say that your cognitive faculties are broken, but then, again, you have no basis to decide whether they are broken or not.
Atla…LOL!!! …..It’s you who claims to be a misrepresentation of reality (an illusion) in your psychosis.
You were asked not to spam this stuff everywhere. Unless someone is actively saying they’re a “misrepresentation of reality” in some thread, you don’t bring it up. Keep it to your own threads, let other people have topics they wish to discuss.
This is an unofficial warning.
2 Likes