I’ve seen a great deal of threads dealing with the subject of morality or ethics on this website where many have stated that such articulations are insane,absurd, hypocritical,pretentious and completely unfounded.
I’m likely to agree with such perceptions and viewpoints in considerance that alot of beliefs centering around the two beliefs of morality or ethics can very well be equated with madness having a direct correlation with cultural superstitions however if we understand that every action has a reaction it very well can be said that there is a bit of logic in the implementation of morals.
Perhaps in order to understand morality or ethics especially for those who are nihilists we must understand the subject purely as emotional reactionism to relative threats and forms of existential danger.
Is it purely a logical reaction completely empirical in nature? Not at all just like people themselves are not completely logical or empirical in nature but nonetheless it still serves a reactional purpose nonetheless even though it leads to utter contradiction a great deal of the time.
The imperfect nature of man is one of wild superstitions, beliefs and unfounded ideologies from which morality or ethics derives from yet nonetheless reactionism is the key instrument of such dispositions which will probally remain in our species existence indefinately no matter what our opinions may be.
In order to make a short observance of morality or ethics I would describe it as a imperfect reactionism constructed by our species which is equally imperfect.