Resisting a thumbs up to a genocidal zionasty shouldn’t be this hard. Don’t worry about him raping anybody btw. Only viewing it online safe in the smell of his internet cubicle.
‘…for no reason..’
‘..no reason’
A 72 year old man:
Jealousy is a biach.
No need for you to be jealous. You could buy yourself a latex woman-suit just like that. They are available online.
“I’m just a simple man, l’m holding out my hand”
I ain’t got no candy for you.
Steph? What the hell… I thought she canceled her channel! I was subscribed for years and then she just went silent. This is great news… thanks for the vid, Vic!
What the fuck do you mean ‘she’? ‘She’ refers to a female human. That thing is barely human, let alone a female human.
LGBTQJEW+ is hated for a good reason…it is a sign of disease. For the same reason we “hate” the flu, or cancer…
It’s demographic impact is a symptom of decline and an imminent end.
A sign of mutational loads that must be purged…either via wars or pandemics…
2 Likes
Satyr:
LGBTQJEW+ is hated for a good reason…it is a sign of disease. For the same reason we “hate” the flu, or cancer…
It’s demographic impact is a symptom of decline and an imminent end.
A sign of mutational loads that must be purged…either via wars or pandemics…
K: having read your drek for years, I would much rather live
in a LGBTQ universe than any you might own up to…
the only disease I see here is your crap…
Kropotkin
1 Like
You are as bad as each other. Two sides of the same coin. The difference is that you hide behind a veneer of wokery and virtue-signalling. No one cares about ‘LGB’. The ‘T’ doesn’t belong with it and means nothing, just like all the other stupid letters and symbols that dumb American wokies have added over the years.
1 Like
VictorMcCheeseEsq:
You are as bad as each other. Two sides of the same coin. The difference is that you hide behind a veneer of wokery and virtue-signalling. No one cares about ‘LGB’. The ‘T’ doesn’t belong with it and means nothing, just like all the other stupid letters and symbols that dumb American wokies have added over the years.
K: and another anti-WOKE person who is so confused as to not
be able to even define what WOKE even means? or would
understand that the idea of ‘‘WOKE’’ is at the heart of
morality and ethics…also leaving the problem if we
were to remove ‘‘WOKE’’ then what ethical/moral
system are we then engaged in? Remove ‘‘WOKE’’
and what is left of morals/ethics?
Kropotkin
1 Like
Wokies always claim to not know what it means. Self reflection isn’t in their DNA. If they did ‘that’ then they would probably die of shame and embarrassment at their own inadequacy and moralising hypocrisy.
VictorMcCheeseEsq:
Wokies always claim to not know what it means. Self reflection isn’t in their DNA. If they did ‘that’ then they would probably die of shame and embarrassment at their own inadequacy and moralising hypocrisy.
K: so, you have no idea what ‘‘WOKE’’ means? I am not surprise…
it has two aspects: one is the idea that all people, regardless of
their morals, politics, sexual identity, or any other aspects like
religion, color of their skin, their nationality are to be treated
with respect and dignity… the second idea is even simpler,
that I am not god and I cannot, in good conscience, play
god by making assumptions about others… for example, the
anti-Jewish crowd around here, who routinely attack Jews,
do so on the non-existent basis of superiority… One can
criticize if, IF, one were actually in some fashion, superior,
to the Jews… I can’t find any grounds to suppose that
I am superior to others, nor can I find any grounds to assume
I am less superior than others… there is simply no basis
upon which I can or you can, supposed to be superior to anyone
else… I am not egotistical enough to think that I can stand in
judgement of other people, especially in terms of morality and ethics…
Kropotkin
“Remove woke, what do you have left?”
18th to early 19th century cultural morality and ethics.
It means a nauseating, virtue-signalling hypocrite who is only interested in conforming to the latest ‘in thing’, hence all the woke celebrity hypocrites and your own dismissal of women’s privacy and safety concerns in favour of grotesque and dangerous male perverts.
1 Like
MrAuthoritarian:
@Peter_Kropotkin
“Remove woke, what do you have left?”
18th to early 19th century cultural morality and ethics.
K: And pray tell, what exactly does that involve?
Does this mean you are in favor of slavery and poor houses
and for almost any crime, prison? If one were to look at
the rate of crime, in say, London roughly 1850… just to throw
out a date… The crime rate in London was extremely high…
and the poverty rate was equally high… so, you are in favor
of vast number of people being in poverty, with virtually no way
out? With slums that created terrible conditions for people to live in,
and within that poverty and slums, you have rampant disease
and with many families living with dozens of people in a single
flat… is that the morality you are in favor of? Why do you think
Marx wrote about the terrible conditions of families that lie at
the heart of communism… it seems to me, one would only
be in favor of this time periods morals and ethics, only if one
had no idea what the conditions were at that time…
and you are pretty clueless… the life expectancy of someone
alive in 1850 was less than 30 years old… that comes directly
from the morals and ethics of the time… there is absolutely
no benefit of any kind living in that time period… ethically or
otherwise…
Kropotkin
1 Like
Talk about clueless. A very big, clean mirror is called for here.