I have seen liberalist scientists make fools of themselves time and time again.
1.I have herd them say that one animal will mimic another animal in order to fool a predidtor. They went on to say that it was nature to lie.
2.I have herd them say that we are just mamals, and a buck will mate with any doe of breeding age. This is reasoning for playerism??? Is this reasoning to legally accept poligamy???
3.I have herd them say that the only thing wrong with sleeping with family members is getting them pregnant. So there is nothing wrong with you if you cannot find love outside of the family???
Why are they so deluted in their thinking? It’s the idea that ,“If it makes you happy then do it. As long as it doesn’t hurt others.” Then this proposes the idea that, “if one person can do it, then it proves it’s normal, and anyone can do it.” So by their logic, a player that needs several women at any given time to keep him happy, has found happiness. And ignore the fact that it takes several women to fill the void of the love of one woman. What about the fact that sex outside of love is only limited by what you are willing to try. For sexual lusts is 100% mental, and that is why people can have fetishes of shoes and other inanimate objects. So the liberalist reply to this is we need to keep a supply of people your own age to limit lusts to what is physically available. Otherwize liberalists would be all over the idea that a man can raise a boy and give him a marital relationship at the same time. We don’t even want to bring in the fact that, people that are attracted to extreamly younger people, do so because they can imagine them as they want. They are attracted to things about the younger, but don’t really love them. Why can’t we admit this fact? Because it cannot be proven. But it can be proven that since sex is 100% mental, that a child can learn to like sex with an adult. So we have a bias system of brainwashing according to the facts we are willing to allow people to look at. Why isn’t this extreamity of child pron going to happen??? Because of preconcieved social standards created by religious fanatics.
If I can show one case that defys psychological beliefs, then I proved this belief wrong. And proved that there is deeper reasoning to the cause and affect against social standards.
The idea is that homosexuality is caused by the body. That means people are born with physical receptors toward the same sex. These recpetors have nothing to do with pharamones or estrogine or testosterone, because this has been proven to be the same in homosexuals and straits. The complexity of the brain cannot be caused by any one gene, so we cannot find one gene that is predominatly homosexual. Yet we can find the obesity gene and anorexia gene and a gene that makes people prone to adrinaline or anger. Yet it’s never been found that there is a homosexual gene. So the liberalist stance is to proclaim homosexuality trumps religious beliefs, even though there is no proof. Yet any fact about God is mere propaganda. Did you know it’s been proven that couples that pray together, statistcally have more intamate relationships. Yet this has no bearing to show that religion works??? I guess this is why I consider liberalists scum when debating them. I guess this is why satanism and liberalism share most all the same beliefs.
A fact… One estrogine + one estrogine equals 2 times the estrogine in a relationship. One estrogin + one testosterone equals out for the most part. An obvious fact that holds no value in our scientific comunity. Obviously this country is full of ases who only see what suits their needs.
Thats why satanic liberalists will say that people only do good toward others because of the selfish benifit of making them feel like they did something. Why else would people only be willing to throw money at the situation and not do something about it. They choose to belittle acts of kindness in order to not worry about it. They want people to think self centardness is the way of life.