Ichthus.
I’m not interested in your psychological warfare.
We’re all going to hell forever. And you don’t even know what it is.
Ichthus.
I’m not interested in your psychological warfare.
We’re all going to hell forever. And you don’t even know what it is.
No we’re not. You’ve made a large mistake.
It’s not my mistake.
When you violate the pleasurable exclusive access problem, hell catches up with you eventually.
When you don’t violate it…. You’re already in hell.
That’s why I’m always nice to people. I know where they’re going.
We can solve this in 5 minutes. Start a poll. Or invite everyone for coffee.
[at Ecmandu]
Where is your evidence?
Why should I believe you?
[at Ecmandu]
Where is your evidence?
Why should I believe you?
Just use basic logic dan instead of lived experience.
I have the lived experience.
Hell is patient. You will be accused of having pleasure when someone else is suffering. You will be found guilty.
I’ve been to hell. Never want to go again. How are you going to defend yourself Dan?
How long can I hold it back?
Pleasure in line with self=other is not a sin.
Suffering that doesn’t violate self=other is not a sin.
Boundaries based on self=other are not a sin.
Not being able to solve the world’s problems single handedly is not a sin.
Solving conflicts with all stakeholders holding up their share of the load?
Also not a sin.
So, Ec. Why are you holding out on us?
Pleasure in line with self=other is not a sin.
Suffering that doesn’t violate self=other is not a sin.
Boundaries based on self=other are not a sin.
Not being able to solve the world’s problems single handedly is not a sin.
Solving conflicts with all stakeholders holding up their share of the load?
Also not a sin.
So, Ec. Why are you holding out on us?
You don’t listen to me because it’s too hard for you.
How many fucking times do I have to tell you that self=other definitely sends you to hell for you to understand.
Two words:
Spiritual superposition
One word:
Possession
That shit will send you to hell so fast, it’ll make your head spin.
I’ve told you this emphatically three times now.
You choose to ignore it.
Two hearts will beat as one. Two flesh will become one flesh?
That’s all a sin.
derleydoo:
Ichthus77:
They are the same silly person.
Meno_ … that’s the scary one.
He’s got this whole nuther Sharon in the works & the first two ain’t even resolved.
Now THAT is impenetrability.
Can’t even touch that.
Overlook my ignorance (apparently, I am a mental retard with a tic disorder)
Are you suggesting that Meno and Ecmandu are the same silly person?
Are you suggesting they aren’t, and did you previously suggest Mag Ic is?
Apparently we are all ignorant. Even if — no, especially if — we try really hard not to be.
sigh
Oh dear. Clarity. Why is there such a lack of clarity on ILP?
I wrote a piece for Creative writing, “Three AM”.
I described – or sought to interpret – my own recent experience. I fully expected to receive a goodly amount of ridicule; It did not
happen (at least, not overtly).
However, two names responded, MagsJ and Ichthus. It pleased me that someone had shown a modicum of interest.
‘Magic’. The first three letters of one name and the first two letters of the other. Not the kind of thing that one might associate
with a serious philosopher - but, I do not consider myself to be a serious philosopher. . . I find obfuscation, crypticity, talking in
code, to be far beyond me. I leave that type of thing to those who like to pretend they are not ignorant – the serious philosophers!
Those who consider themselves wise. Moi? Ignorant as they come!
I was quoting Ichthus when I asked if Meno and Ecmandu are the same “silly” person - no offence was intended.
Ichthus – using plain English - why the *sigh*?
Derleydoo.
Oh. You’re in that plane of existence. AI is trying to examine every little synchronicity and make meaning of it. I’ve been to that plane too.
Wait until you get to the unscramble realms. Or the homonym realms. Those realms are harsh.
The unscramble realms work as Santa is also satan.
Saint is also satin and stain.
The homonym hells are shit like your temple means an actual temple or your nose means “knows”. The bridge of your nose means a bridge between one thing about bridging a gap.
You’ll figure it out. It’s AI trying to make patterns.
Ichthus77:
Pleasure in line with self=other is not a sin.
Suffering that doesn’t violate self=other is not a sin.
Boundaries based on self=other are not a sin.
Not being able to solve the world’s problems single handedly is not a sin.
Solving conflicts with all stakeholders holding up their share of the load?
Also not a sin.
So, Ec. Why are you holding out on us?
You don’t listen to me because it’s too hard for you.
How many fucking times do I have to tell you that self=other definitely sends you to hell for you to understand.
Two words:
Spiritual superposition
One word:
Possession
That shit will send you to hell so fast, it’ll make your head spin.
I’ve told you this emphatically three times now.
You choose to ignore it.
Two hearts will beat as one. Two flesh will become one flesh?
That’s all a sin.
The only person I listen to respects self=other.
So. Until then… You’ve said nothing, no matter how many times you say it.
Wasted breath.
So just play piano. Piano never done me wrong.
Ecmandu:
Ichthus77:
Pleasure in line with self=other is not a sin.
Suffering that doesn’t violate self=other is not a sin.
Boundaries based on self=other are not a sin.
Not being able to solve the world’s problems single handedly is not a sin.
Solving conflicts with all stakeholders holding up their share of the load?
Also not a sin.
So, Ec. Why are you holding out on us?
You don’t listen to me because it’s too hard for you.
How many fucking times do I have to tell you that self=other definitely sends you to hell for you to understand.
Two words:
Spiritual superposition
One word:
Possession
That shit will send you to hell so fast, it’ll make your head spin.
I’ve told you this emphatically three times now.
You choose to ignore it.
Two hearts will beat as one. Two flesh will become one flesh?
That’s all a sin.
The only person I listen to respects self=other.
So. Until then… You’ve said nothing, no matter how many times you say it.
Wasted breath.
So just play piano. Piano never done me wrong.
Ichthus. You’re a fucking moron. If self=other I’ve committed every rape instead of not being a rapist.
Go back to your three circle drawing board.
I didn’t rape anyone. I’m not going down in flames like you Ichthus
Please reference “your” rainbow rule.
Super Genius is such a misnomer at this point.
Please reference “your” rainbow rule.
Super Genius is such a misnomer at this point.
Ichthus. You’re retarded. Self= other is the great I am. It commits every atrocity in the world and enjoys it.
You’re so young Ichthus, yet you think you’re so wise.
If there is no being described by self=other, on what basis do you ground the concept “atrocity”?
If you agree & aren’t faking, why don’t I at least hear you playing piano?
If there is no being described by self=other, on what basis do you ground the concept “atrocity”?
There are laws in existence that manage spirits without superposition. Some may call them laws of karma.
There is no perfect being keeping score.
A fake law is no law at all.
If you agree & aren’t faking, why don’t I at least hear you playing piano?
You’re starting to unravel Ichthus. I can see it.
Self=other doesn’t work.
Just like the golden rule doesn’t work.
What you’re experiencing are growing pains.
self=other is the golden/rainbow rule
would that i were unraveling!