A just released document put out by conservative republicans,
and to name them which helps to make the case…
Senator John Danforth
Benjamin Ginsberg
the Honorable Thomas B. Griffith
David Hoppe,
The Honorable J. Michael Luttig
The Honorable Michael W. McConnell
The Honorable Theodore B. Olson
Senator Gordon H. Smith…
These GOP types released a document called
"Lost, not Stolen: The conservative case that Trump LOST
and Biden won the 2020 presidential election
in which they make the case that IQ45 lost the election and
that Biden won and there was no steal of any kind…
and they go into details… 72 pages of details that lay out exactly
how Biden won the election and no, he didn’t steal it…
but hay, don’t believe me, read the document itself if
you have any doubts…
K: so, what specific argument are false in the 72 page document?
Simple enough question, can you tell me what is specifically wrong
or part of a "fallacious argument, in the 72 pages?
I assume they mean “a republican party member who is actually a democrat party devotee”. I know that some republican party members are actually global socialists and almost the entire democrat party are global socialists - but that doesn’t make them on the same team.
Both Putin and Xi Jinping are global authoritarians - but in competition for the prize - one more oligarchy dictator and the other more communist dictator (one less pure communist - more socialist). The analogy fits Sen McConnell (the “republican”) and one fits Sen Schumer (the “democrat”).
Does that make McConnell a “rino” - I don’t know. It does make both traitors the US Constitution.
Yes, it is ignorant clowns like you that follow the twittering loons, and the Facebook warriors who know fuck all about the details of the election that are falling for argumentum ad populum.
What the RINOs have done in this paper is to present EVIDENCE.
You know fuck all about the details of the election.
You do know that several courts across the land found nothing.
If you had been paying attention you would also know that Trump’s legal team offered no evidence.
You also ought to know that people of sound mind the length and breadth of the country think Trump is an idiot.
Yet with zero evidence you follow the Trump like a little lambikins to the slaughter.
obsrvr524:
An argumentum ad populum is a fallacious argument which is based on claiming a truth or affirming something is good because the majority thinks so.
You philosophical blokes are supposed to already know that so pundits can’t make issue out of fallacious arguments.
K: so, what specific argument are false in the 72 page document?
Simple enough question, can you tell me what is specifically wrong
or part of a "fallacious argument, in the 72 pages?
O:
I don’t know - haven’t read it - and like most of your posts - hardly worth any effort. Your argument was that because a lot of people say it’s true - it must be true.
I thought all philosopher types knew better than that - even you otherwise grossly ignorant types.
K: you say its wrong but you can’t say, HOW it is wrong because you are far too
lazy to engage with actual evidence…and my posts are irrelevant… about the
actual facts on hand… what facts are wrong in this 72 page document?
And that is how the right wing rolls, friends… presented with actual facts,
they lie and run away… and make up shit excuses to avoid the facts…
babbling/making up shit about “a lot of people say its true” I never said
that, Observe said that… he is holding to a statement that only he has
written about, no one else as claimed this 72 page document as being
something “popular” or desired by the “masses”… he is making a counter
argument based on something he said, not on what I said…
I predict he will vanish for several days now… because that is what
gutless cowards do…
