Love and the Brutal Reality

Most people spend their lives pursuing love.

It’s definitely a pleasant experience to be in love with someone.
It’s mystical, like being in heaven, completion.
One of the ultimate euphorias.

As you know, I’ve mentioned before that I’d like to eventually settle down, have my own family.
The whole white-picket fence, suburban neighborhood, house-wife, nuclear family, and what not.
It seems nice on the surface, but I’ve been slowly realizing that it’s, actually, not all what it’s made out to be.

Love, the majority of the time I’d say, is really just lust in disguise.

Ask yourself this (guys): would you stick at your woman’s side, if she was seriously burnt in a house fire, which left
her face and entire body disfigured? Would your passion for her still rage?

Ask yourself this (ladies): would you stick at your man’s side, if he lost his job, became homeless and broke?
Would you continue at his side, regardless of the social embarrassment and hardship of poverty? Would you remain at his side, even if
all his efforts to get back in track didn’t work out, due to external factors, bad luck?

How this so called profound “love” can be extinguished, when things get difficult. Wonder why most marriages don’t last?
This is because it’s not really love, it’s lust, lust with ice-cream sprinkles on top of it, concealing it for what it really is underneath.
Most people get married, because it’s a marker of social status - their way of saying " I made it! Look! I’m successful!", or simply
because of fairy-tale idealisms of living happily ever after, riding into the sunset…only to be scorched by the rays of the ugly truth underlying
it all. For this reason, I just keep my relationships with women casual. It’s much better, actually; multiple sex-partners, no relationship drama,
no strings attached, and no beating around the bush, straight to business — fuck buddies, friends with benefits. No need to sugar-coat it.

So many males, and females, for that matter, spend their lives desperately pursuing this thing called “love”.

It’s really just weakness, softness, a warm blanket meant to comfort feeble-minds from the icy-coldness of reality.

Real men, tough men, do not pursue “love”, like these skinny-jean wearing effeminate morons of today.
Tough men pursue power, not love. Power is their telos, not this lovey-dovey romantic bullshit.

(This is something that will be discussed further in my upcoming e-book.)

Having a son would certainly be nice, to be able to raise him the way I was not, to teach him the things I wish I could have learned,
to raise him to be a lil’ badass. But I digress.

Life is brutal and a brutal mind-set is required.

You have to be one tough mother-fucker, in order to endure reality as it truly is, to stand there in the blizzard of hard-fact, shivering;
yet smirking, taunting it, telling it to “bring it on!” and " Is that all you got?".

I’ve never been a conformist; I’ve always stayed true to myself.
For this reason, I am a lone-wolf. No real friends. I have my sex-partners, but they are only good for one thing: fucking.
And I have no problem with that. I am my own best friend, I don’t need peer-approval, a yuppie-lifestyle, nor “love”.

Rejecting conventional values and lifestyles leaves one on the periphery, in the outer-darkness, in the cold.
But such tough conditions, such a tough environment makes one even tougher, and this I embrace.

Bring it on

Power and strength are my aim.

I leave you with these:


people in real love don’t leave each other for the circumstances you presented. you’re talking about something else, you’re misunderstanding what love is. while what is physical is part of it, it ultimately transcends that. for me it is the feeling of great reverence and sympathy for something that I truly admire. the fact that this great thing will not exist forever and that I had the opportunity to experience it when it did. this perhaps pays testimony to my longing for the eternal recurrence.I want great things to continue to exist somehow.

and sex and love are quite nearly incompatible for me. making love is incomprehensible to me… I only know how to have sex or to f***. if I love a woman it is not because of her sex lastly, as sex is not an expression of love for/to me. It is intellectual and auxillary to the sex. I love the sex, but if I left a woman because I didn’t like the sex, I couldn’t be said to love the woman in the first place.

I think you’re creating false dichotomies.

Love is pheromonal based. Men would stay with their wives even if their appearances change. Also, money is not as big a factor for women as psychic aura. Love is pheromone and psychic based, primarily. Appearance is the secondary factor. Social status and money are the tertiary factor, but it can effect the other factors, ie. people with low social status have less confidence and degraded appearance. It would be quite absurd and evolutionarily unfit for a family to leave each other after a random accident, such as a fire or having bad luck one day. Women do not divorce their husbands if they happen to get fired one day, and men do not leave Mommy if she has an accident. To do so would be ignoble, and degenerate.

it is, love encourages cuddling which keeps us warm in icy cold winters. To refuse it is evolutionary disadvantageous, and in conflict with the secret spiritual chain (the spirit guide).

If you arent alpha enough to handle one person, how are you supposed to handle a squad? So alpha.

Erik is a hopeless barbarian.

I like how he quotes Nietzsche as if Nietzsche actually supported this primitive way of thinking . . .

Not hopeless; rather, auspicious.

Does Nietzsche need to be in complete accord with my way of thinking, in order for me to quote him?

Nietzsche was against petty sentimentalisms and favored power acquisition.

You’re quoting an enemy.

Nietzsche wasn’t a barbarian and he wasn’t so hung up on power even though his main doctrine is called “will to power”.

He’s not a brute.

You are preaching egoistic barbaric tribalistic hyper-masculine values. You are preaching power for the sake of power.

Not what Nietzsche did. Nietzsche was a gentleman. You are just a failed barbarian.

Instead of destroying the world you are quoting Nietzsche.

Nietzsche was a brute, an intellectual brute.

That is not an insult; it takes a brute to accept the brutal Truth.

I’m not trying to destroy the world; I’m not like Joker/Laughingman.

I just want to live, love and fight. And, of course, leave my mark on the world through my future books.

Through your future books . . . you are insane.

I’m not expecting to be some Steven King.

I will have a cult-following; my books will not be for the masses.

But there will be a following, that I know.

“At the commencement, the noble caste was always the barbarian caste: their superiority did not consist first of all in their physical strength, but in psychical power.”

  • Nietzsche, BGE

Nietzsche, the intellectual brute.

You don’t have to do that. Just relax. Don’t take your life so seriously.

Noble caste did not evolve from barbarian caste.

Why? So I can be mediocre, like you?

No, so you can be a little less mediocre than you really are.

You see things upside down. You want to be famous. Why? What’s the point? Fame should be symptom if anything, not a goal in itself. I teach people to be comfortable with themselves. You, on the other hand, teach them to feel inadequate.

Who doesn’t want to be famous? There is much power and glory in fame.

But this is not essential to my happiness. It’s not even a goal of mine.

If it happens, it happens.

Comfortable with themselves? I teach people to over-come themselves, to reach their highest potential, to be the best version of themselves.
And it’s not about power for the sake of power; it’s about self-actualization.

No genuine person wants to be famous. The desire for fame is a mistake, should be interpreted as a mistake.

The best way to teach people to be the best version of themselves is by teaching them to be comfortable with themselves. You don’t do this. You are a sort of fearmonger who motivates other people into action using scare tactics.

You call romantic ideals a weakness that has to be overcome. It’s obvious, Erik, you are a barbarian who is overwhelmed by fear.

Fear of what?

That’s none of my interest. The point is that you are obviously dominated by fear. Whoever says that romantic ideals should not be pursued is an imbecile who is dominated by fear. The reality is that there is absolutely NOTHING worth pursuing other than romantic ideals. All other ideals are rubbish in comparison. And people like you – the conservatives – have no ideals whatsoever precisely because you are too afraid to pursue them.

We are surrounded by fearful people. That’s important to keep in mind. You have to watch out, they will take every chance to spread their fear onto you.