You’re not making any sense.
Intimacy isn’t supposed to make sense!
It’s just something you do with balanced confidence. You don’t write up some fantasy fairy tale to go with it. That makes you seem so unsure of yourself like you’re worshiping your partner or want your partner to worship you.
If you want to be impressive, be charismatic. Play word games. Show you have creative thinking, and blend that into physical interaction. Dancing is a classic example. If you’re not good at dancing, then go out to eat or go bowling or see a movie. Do something where you have the chance to touch each other casually as part of the ebb and flow of things.
If your partner isn’t receptive to being touched, then your partner’s too immature and not worth your time.
It was an example to show what typical women “want” from a man, either in a relationship or sexually.
This is going off topic.
My point was that the physical act of penetration is the “closest” a man and woman can be. It’s even more than this. A sperm penetrates the egg, and genetic material from the male is enclosed inside the body of the female. It’s not the same as kissing and sharing saliva. It’s the “closest” two human beings can ever become.
My point is you’re grossing things out by being so scientific. You’re distancing yourself from the emotional style of what happens just to focus on biology.
You need to look at intimacy artistically. It’s not about mechanics. It’s about involvement. It’s about feeling someone else. It’s about mutual passion where people care to stimulate each other. It’s mushy, wet, warm, wild, soft, sweet, smooth, and sensitive because people make it so. It’s not about a couple robots simply reproducing. It’s about people engaging each other.
Well you’re approaching this from the perspective of women, not men. If you want to become empathetic, understanding, philosophical, then you need to consider what it’s like for men. I mean, I know why it’s important for us to “love” each other, and have something “more” than sex. I understand that, because I understand you. Some men know what women want. But maybe no women know what men want.
Maybe women only know what men do not want. Maybe you are blind to what men want?
Dude, my experience is male lovers are typically barbaric slobs, not deep thinkers. The deep thinkers get overlooked because they’re boring. Women are the ones who are supposed to carry intuition in a relationship while men impress women with confidence.
Don’t get esoteric about this. The sublime is wonderful. That’s it. Don’t overcomplicate things.
You don’t over complicate things! I can do whatever I want to, you’re not the boss of me.
Yep—^^
=D>
I’m not trying to boss you around. I’m just trying to give you friendly advice so you can succeed in your pursuits.
It actually sounds like you need the advice, when you mentioned that love “can’t last everyday”.
You’re completely wrong, and I pity you for never knowing true love. Some people have experienced it. Everyday, for weeks, for months, for years. Every kiss is the first kiss. Every moment is the first moment anew. Both parts, man and woman, need each other mutually, balancing obsession and sanity.
Careful not to become too consumed by each other.
It sounds to me like you may never know the experience. You have no “advice” worth my hearing.
Atthet"
What a pity - isn’t that the best kind of sexual encounter - when male and female feel/are emotionally/mentally and physically seduced by one another but perhaps not to the same degree.
.
Hmmm…if it’s ‘conquering’ without permission and with violence, it is indeed rape.
But the thought occurs - if it’s simply physically conquering without the other two dynamics, can it be considered to be rape insofar as both agree to it - but it’s simply a physical act? Aside from that, is it even possible for the sex act to not have any emotional or mental ingredients albeit there be no caring?
.
So if a woman gives herself to a man wholeheartedly without the benefit of seduction, can that be considered to be rape? It almost seems to me that you enjoy being the seducer. Could it be good for you if it was she who seduced or if there was no working for it on your part?
.
That’s part of your psychology but it might not be necessarily true. I might say that the same holds true for many men.
.
You mean, because she’s not some lioness on the Serengeti?
Some women! Stop putting us all in the same category.
Well, I will grant you this - it does require a breaking down of some human boundaries. It does require that we allow ourselves to be human. But intimacy is not necessarily about sex. For a man or a woman who regards ‘intimacy’ as purely sexual, they haven’t a clue about what intimacy is.
It doesn’t really matter much since perceiving your mentality, I’ve already transcended that physical attraction. 
omg - I’ve returned to the dark ages.
.
There is no demand for friendship but there may be hope for the possibility of one.
As for the guardian, dragons do not need guardians.
You buy me things? You’re so funny. I would actually prefer that you bring me a seashell from the beach or pick this beautiful different kind of leaf from a tree…that kind of thing. Buying me things only shows me that you are a controlling kind of person.
What are you, a male prostitute? lol
Something like that would have little, if no, hold on me at all.
Now you’re talking…
Let’s try harmonizing the lot…
Again, let’s just harmonize them into being and becoming…
Anyway, I would say that simply Being in the moment is the height of existence.
Don’t over complicate all of this, it’s simple.
Women demand control over their own sexuality. Females don’t just allow any and every strange man to approach them and have sex.
Now you’re whistling another tune. :-"
I know you are but what am I!
Females have never been complicated to me in my entire life. 
That’s what they think. The whole point of the OP is whether touch can generate love. It can certainly generate magic… and more… against the will of either partner.
No offense, but, I don’t believe you.
“I know you are” makes sense - but - “but what am I” - makes no sense.
Tell me, what ARE you? Are you asking me to quess? lol
If you do not find females complicated - then you truly do not understand us at all…ergo, your perceptions of us.
I see nothing mysterious about you, Arcturus Descending.
Of course you do not. One can only be mysterious to another when they are curious in the first place about something or someone. It’s curiousity itself that renders something as mysterious.
And if we think that we have all of the answers, what is there to be left curious about?