How do you know philosophy is about resolving problems if you cant even give an example of a single problem in a whole history of philosophy that has been resolved?
How do you know philosophy is about resolving problems if you cant even give an example of a single problem in a whole history of philosophy that has been resolved?
Because they are looking for answers to questions. That alone tells you they are trying to solve problems.
For example, when they ask “What is knowledge?”, they are asking for someone to define the word “knowledge”. By doing so, they are positing a problem to be solved.
Just because somebody tries to swim in a game of basketball does not mean the game of basketball is about swimming.
Just because somebody tries to swim in a game of basketball does not mean the game of basketball is about swimming.
Correct.
So what is philosophy about?
Philosophy deals with that which concerns humans and is unavailable to proper empirical investigation and hence closed off to being worked on scientifically. You can use sciences in philosophy. You can use logic(finite mathematics) to formalise and rigorize your thoughts as an example or you can draw from scientific findings as well.
First and basic premise: self-respect through rigid boundaries towards others and rigid rules towards yourself.
Cynicism is a much greater existential threat than nihilism. Cynicism leads to nihilism and primitivism but nihilism and primitivism are a welcoming denial of any higher value beyond ones base self-interest whilst the cynic is somebody who welcomes nihilism after surrendering his desire for higher values so he is a much greater loss.
Those who imply they are trustworthy are not trustworthy. Pretences are meant to dupe.
Those who imply they are trustworthy are not trustworthy. Pretences are meant to dupe.
Ya think!?
Idiots struggle with most basic things…free-will does not imply completely free will…nobody sane with a normal intelligence does not believe a man is free from everything…free-will is a problem and a paradox despite these things being not true and applicable… free-will is not even a self evident term…it is not a Freudian attack on religious people…or quantum mechanics for dullards who dont understand maths,it is not about bouncing two simplistic definitions around and explaining how they are not contradictory by refusing to accept alternative definitions.
read the autistic neo-nazi idiots completely miss the point:
knowthyself.forumotion.net/t2410p660-free-will
and compare it to this rumbling:
ilovephilosophy.com/viewtop … start=6375
two different mouths, same shit. this is what you get…tens of idiots claiming to have it ‘under control’ and being able to ‘explain it’ yet completely missing the point and unable to come with basic explanatory terms…waste of time.
Determinism versus Free Will is I think a badly formulated dichotomy. It presupposes that consciousness/will is either imposed by past or completely independent of past and so ‘choice’ is either an imposition on a passive observer or a totally arbitrary event that occurs spontaneously out of nothing. 0/1. Consciousness becomes either a powerless victim of the world or a god without any sort of constraint.
take away the quantum foam and what do you get??? dullards are funny. pretentious dullards are indigestible. childish and self evident truisms mixed with freudian attacks on random figures meant to stroke ones own self image.
**Brain is not mind. Brain is the literal physical organ with all its functions, the mind is the array of manifestations of the products of the brain. The products of something are not the things itself. Even if you understood the brain completely, you would not understand the mind completely; understanding water completely does not tell you everything about everything the water is involved in. The point here is that the problem of free will is not contained to the brain. This is not the only issue here but is one of the few.
**Free-will is not a nonsensical term. We all have choice, we all know we have choice, so we all know we have free will since it is exactly this what we experience as choice. Choice is practically equivalent to free will. Animals also have a free will because they have choice. A rat or a human can turn right or left…who makes the choice?, they do. So they have free will to make their choice. Morons miss this obvious preliminary thing… this is what we talk about when we say free-will…in this context, any talk of some ’ hard determinism’ or complete freedom is idiocy. Free will exists even if everything is determined and complete freedom is completely irrelevant to the free-will discussion.
If somebody wanted to get to me with some valid accusation, it would be that I even took what the autistic neo-nazi dullards wrote seriously and paid attention to it for so long. This is the most valid stab at me, that I am indeed a weirdo kook myself, given that no normal, adjusted person would have done so but instead laughed and had forgotten about it the next day.
Only complete goons believe there are special cultures or civilisations in whichever direction, be it positive or negative or anything. Humans are humans, one of the most obvious facts the kooks living in their paranoias and insanities miss completely. I bet they also really believe they themselves are supremely special and unique.
If you think its really that hard for somebody to loose their fucking marbles just have a look at an average 70 year old.
When the Romans put millions of Germanic heathens to the sword, they were not hateful towards heathens. Christians were. When neo-pagans with Hitler at the front marched and put millions of ethnic Europeans to the sword, it was not them hateful towards Europeans, it was Christians. Almost as if there is nothing to be blamed for as long as you are a paGAYn, almost as if paGAYns are a sect and split the world between themselves and others, where others are to be hated whilst the insiders are to be defended to the death and adored unconditionally.
false
Costurd (aka polishrodent) wrote:
Why are people living their lives without harming anyone else dysfunctional? Should thrash metal be banned because I don’t like it? Marijuana because I don’t smoke it? If you don’t like Sam Smith videos don’t watch them. Moral panics have been going on for millennia, they’re nothing new.Who said anyone was ‘panicking’? This is how simplistic they are.
Underneath all their academic posturing and bravado and deference to science, deep down, they are simply common run-of-the-mill dimwits who cannot think critically. This is, after all, exactly why they hide and conceal their stupidity in academia and authoritative source material. So that others can do their critical thinking for them, and they can use the information of these authorities to aggrandize and exaggerate their intelligence, while masking their latent deficiencies. A generation of Good Will Hunting’s; using their supposed intelligence or “genius” to memorize useless information and knowledge to impress their chappies, or appear smart, or get some pussy.
When the rodent was using one of his many sock puppets last time, the transgender avatar that he chose in a desperate attempt to ruffle our feathers, that dumb fag posed the same questions. I used the example, which i consider a very pertinent one in relation to these idiotic questions, about how a virus spreads. The initial infection begins a process of its replication and multiplication and pervasion throughout body, if left unchecked, it will ultimately destroy the host, because that is its nature. Social aberrations are no different, they follow the same pattern and method of hijacking, undermining and reaping destruction throughout the society. Crime is such an aberration. Without enforcement of law, anarchy is the logical conclusion.
The rodent thinks only subjectively, thinking only of himself as the reference point to determine whether something is good or bad for society, by whether its good or bad for him, unable to think cohesively, universally, because it has a tiny myopic mind. Unable to understand how the world at large is affected by such problems. This is how idiotic this faggot is. This is the level of his ‘academic training’ and what it amounted to.
who the fuck is costard hahah is it me now? the idiot is taking his cowardly strawmans against me to a new level by attributing my opinions to seperate people hahahahha WHAT THE FOOK!!!
i dont use sock puppets unlike these neonazi fags since my nickname always makes it obvious who i am…the neonazi autist is getting himself confused…he should take a moment to think his mumbling through before he stims and shits out his wordsalads…
Did you just call yourself a Polish rodent?