Female politicians, female scientists, are usually masculine looking and have male characteristics, the one’s that don’t, the Sarah Palins of the world, the Miss Teens, are usually retards.
Adult males have no inherent value to women. Women do not sexually fawn over adult males, except for 1 or 2 males out of the entire population, such as Brad Pitt. Compare this to the horse population, male horses have intrinsic sexual value, females “get in heat” and lust after the male horses. Male horses have inherent sexual value, male humans have no inherent sexual value. There is no “mating season” for humans, and we can see this reflected in the calendar holidays. There is no sexual mating ritual represented in the holidays, only a “valentines day” which is not analogous to “getting in heat”, but more so a day to celebrate the possibility of future friendship and romance, and more so, it is a holiday involving rejection, the lack of getting valentines cards from crushes.
When I said women only fawn after 1 or 2 males out of the population, I did not mean 1% of the population. I literally meant 1 or 2 males. The 1% of the male population does experience more sexual diversity than everyone else, but this is not because they have inherent value to human women. Even the privileged 1% must approach women carefully, sensitively, tactically, and deviously, to accomplish a romance. And these males still have no inherent value. The value of a male is derived from invisible qualities, not his inherent male form. For instance, if a male is hired more often than a female, that is because there is an implied assumption that the male is more intelligent than the female. The male has no inherent value, for instance, if he finds out that the male is actually no more intelligent than the female, the female will be preferred. Males are valued for their abilities, for instance the local handyman is cherished, not because he is a man, but because he his honest, reliable, and can fix things. Males have no inherent value. Males are considered as apes by females, only when a female can look past his male form, and see his invisible qualities, like “Oh…what a good person you are Johnny, I see the angel inside!” does attraction begin. Males have no inherent sexual value, males are like apes, the suicide rate of men is 10 to 1 compared to women.
This seems to be an evolutionary dead end. The only time when males have inherent sexual value to women is when they are teenagers. During this window you will see the female of the species initiate flirtation and contact with the males. After this window, women no longer approach males, and are cold to males, adult males have to resort to using their invisible qualities and seducing women and dominating women. This leads to a backwards society where irresponsible teen pregnancy is the norm, and suicidal adult males who are not cared for by women and have no inherent value to women. Furthermore, the discernment used by women to evaluate invisible qualities is usually irrational, and often immoral. For instance, many women have the minds of brutes and savages, who are attracted to male traits of conspicuous consumption, violence, gluttony, and hedonism. It is often hard to tell that these women are brutes, because of their feminine mannerisms and exterior. For instance, I was reading a shabby romance novel and in it, the author stated that she found vegans and those who were interested in clean energy, weak and unnattractive, and that she was only attracted to meat-eaters and people who enjoyed driving diesel engines and gas cars. So, there seems to be an archetype, Pollution Girl, who is aroused at oil tycoons and men who pollute the planet, and is unnattracted to men who want to clean and help the planet. This is backwards evolution, runaway natural selection where the females are unable to discern what is good for the community. The reason for this is simple, estrogen is a sleep hormone and as such causes mental fog, while simultaneously giving feelings of mental refreshedness, giving off a sense of false confidence to females. This results in a categorical dimorphism of females…certain groups will resist and overcome themselves, which I will call group A, other groups will succumb to themselves, which I call group B of women. Group A of women are usually bisexual or lesbian like, they are often either feminists, or anti-feminists. Their politics are not as rudimentary as Group B of women. Group A will be attracted to feminine men, who resemble them. Thus, the popularity of boy bands, Loki, Edward Cullen, Elvis, Kaulitz bros, Marilyn Manson, Johnny Depp, Backstreet Boys, Michael Jackson, Nsync, etc. who look feminine. Group A is more or less attracted to feminine men who resemble them. This is why they will often be found in couples who look like “clones”…short men who are fragile and definitely not alpha, as their lovers and soulmates. Group B is the opposite dimorphism, these are more or less political bimbos, the type of women who view lesbian behavior as “weird and strange”, the type of woman who is typically ignorant about common knowledge/common sense things. This archetype is attracted to masculine alphas, men who either abuse her or make her feel stupid, men who do conspicuous consumption, gluttons, etc. However, this still means males have no inherent value. Group B is only attracted to males who built themselves up, going to the gym, living gluttonous lifestyles, learning to be bullyish and manipulative, etc. Group A is only attracted to the feminine aspects of the male form, not the male form itself, except for the penis and muscles.