A believing animal.
That’s all, carry on…please…
ROFL this thread is here? man is? Do you mean man? Do you mean Human? The two are seperate. Man is a gender, Human is a species.
“Humans are. . .?” Compared with what?
Walking around in the bookstore. In the new books isle.
On the left- Big name scientist’s book: There ain’t no damn God
On the right- Big name scientist’s book: Oh yes there is!
Near the back, actually next the hotdog stand outside and on sale- in the philosophy section (which is three books) an old book covered in dust says something about “ration…” and I can’t make out the next letters…
LoL…
As the old saw goes, what does this have to do with the price of rice in China? What is your OP asking?
what does this have to do with the price of rice in China? What is your OP asking?
Oh great response! Well, the price of rice gets a better theory if what I say is true.
Maybe the thought could be better expressed like this :
Do people rationalize then believe
or
Believe then rationalize?
Much better, clearer, worthy of comment.
Rationalize then believe (beliefs in the sense of religious) then when attacked believe through rationalization(no matter their error(s)) We are believing creatures so once we (those with the tendency to value belief) claim to “believe” something it pretty much stands until we “believe” something else instead of when we “rationalize” something else ( in regard to those who tend to “believe” more than “rationalize”)
Man is better than woman. 
Human is a clever animal with opposible thumbs and a decent sized brain.
Here Murex I will help you find the rest of your statement… Lets see I think you left it over here … yes there it is, lets see how this fits…
Man is better than woman at losing things, not finishing things and finishing certain things way too soon.
Yep it fits just right… See how helpful women can be?, Men need women and women need men, sometimes. 
You need to be careful about such overgeneralization about the brain size. thats not quite accurate. Politicians require a different size, as do Lawyers and bl****s 
IS is still an IS.
Caught ya fishin down in the abyss.
Or to express in another way-
When one says he holds no belief, one believes HE does so.
Don’t believe me? You have to believe you don’t.
Now I’m coming up for air: It seems to me this concept is not so well understood at least in practice. It may sound tautological but when we expect cultures to integrate, races to unite, gender’s to define equality, we are amazed by the irrationality.
But irrational the other side may not be. They may be exactly rational.
It was a joke Kriswest.
But women do suck at driving at least. 
Nature exists without ideals but man exists separately since his whole existence is one of faith in his own idealistic constructions even though such inventions hold no warrant amongst creation.
… is another condition, or domestication as Don Miguel Ruiz terms it. “I am human” is part of the cacophony from the drunken monkey.
ROTFL It was obvious yours was, So was mine
I have no problems with Gender lines, they end up funny. If the person is dead serious it strikes me as even more funny. People take these things way to serious, don’t you think?
A man(/woman) will either choose to ‘believe, then rationalize’, or ‘rationalize, then believe’. I chose the latter.
But for either choice, let me ask this: to what end?
Didn’t even mighty Descartes have to believe first?
One is the right path. It is either; a free or a constricted flow of life.
The question “Is there a purpose for life?” will send people in two directions.
some will say yes and then will rational ize and conceptual;ize
the other will analyze and rationalize and will still be in awe
…many and one.
Man is also a species when used as such, which is how I believe it was intended to be used.
The PC police are everywhere.