Many of us judge on how we want to see those people that affects who we are
But this is the only choice a person can ask if there is a situations that deals with a reason of personal interest and a interest that involves values and i had seen the outside the world progressing through life but we as humans cannot choose one but we cannot be both too when it comes in the terms of those promises we as humans take when the mind and the heart are the only reason why we functions to have every sense to fullfilling our lives and for choosing the highest and the lowest, And it can be a reason why some of us may see this topic too much just to achieve a straightforward reason why this is the topic i made when it comes to the mind and the heart that will can be the situations reason why you put to choose the mind and the heart you have now, Itās almost like the idea of having an runway in an airport without the function or the object to be called the runway.
Choosing one is the present of the next actions for tomorrow not for the entire life you want to stay on and as much as i hate to say it everything must move along in this reason of today with the tomorrow of the choice that you have caused today, Humans likes us are complex to learn what we question inside.
It comes up a lot in various ways all throughout philosophy.
How do we demonstrate (actuate) a love that objectively (without inequality) respects the subjectivity (personhood) of everyone impacted by our willful (in)action?
That satisfies practical reason, an intellectual hunger for consistency, and an intuitive sense of shared but distinct personhood.
So. Mind and Heart ā in (willedā¦Spirited) (pr)action.
your heart should guide your mind at first when schooled in philosophy/science since truth and its function are the concern of both heart and mind, after a while the mind can know what the heart wants and needs - Nathan
āHow do we demonstrate (actuate) a love that objectively (without inequality) respects the subjectivity (personhood) of everyoneā
I was just reading about how Cartesianism and the private-self-soul to come out of it paved the way for civil institutions by creating the idea of āequalityāā¦ something that would logically follow if everyone is a transcendental subject. The body may be unequal, sure, but all immutable souls before God are equal, and therefore, everyone must have the same rights. (The clergy and the ruling aristocrats then proceeded to divy out rights to the citizens and slaves as they saw fit).
This is exactly how the barbarians were tamed. They were taught that they were souls before the same Christian God as everyone else, and that they therefore had the same rights as everyone else, and, were obligated to observe and honor those rights in others.
well this is wrong, love is an action and perfect love is an intelligent action. Love is objective and is very conditional, favoring adamant displays o
f intelligent authorityāsā¦ Positive, strong traitsā¦ love only recognizes strong and intelligent prospects and authority in the universe. Not everyone deserves love, not everyone is capable of love. Love is wisdom and wisdom is love
Yes but if one would encapsulate it, what could be proposed, if needed be, as titled or entitled; wisdom of love or the love of wisdom?
The profoundity which aspires to challenge love or wisdom as formative , is hard pressed to distinguish or subordinate the value of one from the other, making such choice rather arbitrary, to weigh in on, especially on first impression?
Itās remarkable how rarely such relations could work, as blind sighted mostly arise in those instances.,
Killing recidivist pedophiles is mercy killing because if you went insane and started doing that to children, you would want someone to permanently stop you. That is to sayā¦ you would want that unless you were completely insane. That is the difference between seeing (insight) and not seeing (anosognosia).
The only circumstance under which one would not kill a recidivist pedophile is if they actually repented.
fax no printer
Iām only letting you off because s/he who is forgiven more loves more, and Iād have to kill practically the entire universe ā¦ and Iām only one (imperfect) person.
Plus, you had a really crappy childhood that you still use as a good excuse ā and eventually youāll grow up and stop doing that. And apologize for the way you talk to your mom. ā¦whilst playing music for her on your guitar. Iām not going to listen to it unless you properly label it as an apology to your mom. It could also double as a confession because Iām sure thereās a shit ton of things she doesnāt know you did or your ass would be out by now. If I were her, Iād slap you every time you even thought about talking to me like that. Just kidding ā¦ but I would want to. With a closed fist.
curtsies
I would never say any of this in person. That may or may not be true, and some of it I might do rather than just say. It is a mystery solved only in the context.
Also who the eff cares what Nietzsche had to say about Descartes.
If I ever go insane & hurt a child, feel free to permanently stop me.
I pre-forgive you, and thank you at the same time.
That you donāt count Roman Catholics as Christians is veryā¦ anti-Catholic. So thatās weird.
What is Sindhu? I googled. Itās a region, not a religion. I thought ā¦ well. Nevermind. I identify as a Martianā¦ never been to Mars. In choosing myself, I choose the Martian cultureā¦ in preparation. In the future, they may accuse me of preemptive appropriation. As long as they spell my name correctly.
