PS have you ever noticed how there’re a whole bunch of “three” laws? Laws of motion. Thermodynamics. And so forth. Coincidence?
Because there are 7 days in a week, and there are 10 Commandments. 10 - 7 = 3. Duh?
oh. of course.
(red) love eternal essence
(yellow) love other essence as self essence
(blue) legislate in line with the above
my bad
It’s red, green, and blue. RGB
Green is a shorter wavelength than red, and blue is a shorter wavelength than green.
Wavelength x frequency = speed of light
Obviously if the wavelength is shorter then the frequency is greater, because frequency is cycles per second.
So a wavelength of 1 meter has a frequency of 299,792,458 Hertz. A wavelength of 299,792,458 meters has a frequency of 1 hertz. So a frequency of .5 hertz has a wavelength of what???
I pick the colors here. You do the math.
What color is a frequency of a CB radio, channel 19, which is a frequency of 27.185 MHz?
I meant I’m stickin with red, yellow, blue.
But here, pick what makes sense for whatever you’re doing:
If you translated it into music and then went down the bars into visible light, you could make it make sense.
Do you have a source for that or is that personal speculation?
FJ,
What conditions must be met for action/reaction, and does a quantum metastable state meet those conditions? It is a wonder anything ever went from metastable to temporal.
plato.stanford.edu/entries/quan … ld-theory/
As interesting as that question may be, I don’t believe it answers the question I asked.
What other than Newton, where QFT is at with the “vacuum”, and logic applied to the universe & the above, were you expecting? Do you have a counter argument?
Btw, here’s a convo I recently had with AsSiStanT Pinnochio on the vacuum:
ilovephilosophy.com/viewtopic.p … 0#p2895380
That was not their first answer to my questions. Their first answer sounded trained by atheists, but I did not let them off the hook.
I don’t know what you’re talking about. I feel like you’re jumping between subjects at random.
My post was about a specific topic: the ability (for a rocket, for example) to move in space without any other matter to ‘resist against’. I don’t know what any of the other stuff you’re saying has to do with that. I don’t have a counter argument because I am not even convinced it’s on topic.
I did, however, provide a counter argument to the claim you made in the OP.
looks at FJ very sternly
You do not need anything to resist to move. Newton said because he looked up. What’s you problem?
Resistance creates drag.
If there is resistance then tell why the earth does not slow down and stop?
How come comets keep coming back?
If there isn’t resistance, why don’t they fly straight into the black hole to start with?
I have another question. If this ocean is a source and sink, what perturbed so that particles could interact with it? Why aren’t particles coming from it as a source? How in the world are they talking about particles that have no structure? How in the world are they talking about particles that get their mass from the source/sink ocean, but not their structure?
to repeat
How are you going to detect something without mass and without structure? Same way you’re gonna talk about black holes without ever being passed the event horizon?
We’ve all been hoodwinked!