Why no CEO of earth? As a nationalist I am opposed to global government, I don’t think we’ll ever be ready for such a reality and we probably never will be. We certainly aren’t ready for such a reality now as we’re not evolved enough.
For centuries the very powerful have dreamed about global government not because they really care about the people living on this planet but because of the allure of global domination or power it brings for themselves. For me global government has enormous potential to be abused which is why I am against such notions firmly remaining in the political nationalist camp.
On feminism we live in a society now where young women make more money than men, where there is more women in college than there is men, and where a majority of men anymore are chronically single unmarried. This is a huge problem for society where a majority of men are shunned away from society where they give up on society altogether, this obviously becomes very problematic long term.
Of course this was never about sexual equality between the genders but instead looks like organized revenge against the majority of men in all forms or segments of society.
Women in the very beginning complained about the gender pay gap between men and women where now they’re complaining that a majority of men don’t make enough money for their sexual attraction where young women today have the slogan describing it as the male loser epidemic. [Basically writing off the majority of men as losers.]
In my opinion feminism needs to be scrapped altogether for a more mutual system that caters to both sexes because it’s clear feminism doesn’t care about men at all where it is all very one sided.
On Zionism I am opposed to sending Israel billions of dollars every single year like we have been doing since 1947.
I am all for Jewish nationalism of Israel, we can stop sending them money and weapons where they can suffer the consequences of declaring war on all their neighbors throughout the entire Middle East alone by themselves. If they want to complain about antisemitism they can simply leave western nations for that genocidal hellhole that they have created for themselves suffering the direct consequences of it. Problem fixed.
I think it is disgusting how much political power they have in the west including inside the United States being an extremely small minority of the population, there is no room for Zionism in our political government system, it simply must go.
Like I said, I would want to create a communist autocratic system that is pro working class where workers, intellectuals, and innovators are paramount to the entire society deeply ingrained in the nation’s culture. It wouldn’t be a perfect system, no system really is but that’s the direction I would take in my ideal national state.
The autocrat leader himself would be a philosopher ideally who would want to see the very best of his nation because in his national pride there is the genuine love of his people. For me that is the ideal autocratic leader, they see it as their sacred national duty of trust to serve their people and nation.
For me I believe democracy is unworkable because of money like political representatives or parties being bribed and blackmailed with money by extremely wealthy private individuals. It is that kind of corruption that makes democracy unworkable.
I don’t know enough about futarchy to have much of an opinion on it to be honest.
You know, in one thread I actually supported the idea that any foreigner who has been inside the United States longer than fifteen years should get instant citizenship where anybody who has been in the nation less that fifteen years should be immediately deported. That’s not a position any fullscale racist would support. I try my best to be a civic nationalist and fair to all people regardless of their race or ethnicity.
I live roughly eighty miles north of the Mexican American border where I like to think I have a front row seat to the immigration crisis enveloping this nation of ours.
Of course I get called racist because I believe white European people should be able to express our cultural identity openly and because I don’t think it is a good idea for white Europeans to become racial minorities in all of our individual nations either.
Make no mistake, even in a future where a racial or ethnic diaspora of all white Europeans takes place eventually killing off all Caucasians off the entire face of the planet which seems to be the neoliberal utopian multiracial dream it won’t just stop with Caucasians, all the other racial or ethnic groups around the world will find themselves eventually affected as well. In the future I can imagine a scenario where millions of African migrants will flood northeast Asia and there will be complaints of all the racist Chinese, Mongolians, Koreans, or Japanese that won’t accept them within their national borders. The next public talking point would be that there is no such thing as native or indigenous Chinese, Mongolian, Korean, or Japanese people where the Asian yellow race isn’t real where anybody who speaks out against such sentiment will be called an Asian yellow supremacist. The goal is to get rid of all racial, ethnic, cultural, and national identities around the world, it won’t just stop with Europeans or white people, the goal is to destroy all racial ethnicities worldwide.
White Europeans are first on the global chopping block it would seem, but once ethnic white Europeans are gone everybody else around the world will be targeted shortly afterward.
I am a big skeptic of transhumanism and technocracy, I believe this push to replace the human element with robotic automation and so called artificial intelligence programs to be a grave mistake. For me it will all end in huge disaster creating a very anti human society and civilization. It is clear that these pushes are designed to make the capitalists all powerful and almost god like in asserting their technological dominance over the world’s working class peoples. Moreover the automation of human labor will mean the death of the human working class and it is no secret they already view us as disposable human garbage waste already. UBI will never happen, they have never had any compassion for the working class where they will show none in the future even still, they will only be happy when we’re all simply eradicated.
If it was up to me all global migration and mass foreign immigration would be stopped to a halt. There’s only so much individual nations can do in absorbing global population segments, there are social, political, cultural, and economic limits to these sorts of things where left unregulated will cause all kinds of cultural ethnic conflict. Society will further destabilize the more these conflicts become the norm overtime everywhere.
This little thing is getting discussed a bit around the internet. This dude Connor went on some Jubilee program, said these things:
I was reminded of this thread because Connor said he’s for autocracy. That’s not the only thing he said, he went on to say some more generally extreme ideas.
Apparently, subsequent to this appearance, he got fired from his job for what was said.
What are you trying to say Flannel? I should be exposed for my views and fired from my job? My entire life should be ruined because I think a certain way you disapprove of? Well, that’s mighty neoliberal of you. Makes sense, it was you guys who invented Cancel Culture after all. You cannot stand debate or any exchange of ideas and communication that directly contradicts your own where you’re more prone to destroy the lives of anybody you disagree with, especially the ones you cannot argue with. Yes, that has become a particular neoliberal way of doing things over the years.
Ironic because you guys claim to want deradicalization or deescalation while you simultaneously target individuals that dare disagree with your entire worldview.
Of course if you guys keep playing dirty like that don’t think there won’t be any repercussions overtime, the other side would eventually strike back. Swinging pendulums and all that jazz.
Your low level threat has been noted for public posterity. And you guys call others oppressive JackBoots in comparison to yourselves, hilarious.
It’s amazing I get called racist here as both a Marxist and communist, I would support a position that would legalize half of illegal immigrants or migrants in this nation to the status of national legal citizens where deporting the other half whose breaking of federal immigration laws are more obvious.
I have talked about the construction of cultural districts and neighborhoods for all races or ethnicities equally including talking about the reconstruction of African American neighborhoods along with others because I really do believe in the general well-being of everyone. [That includes people of all races or ethnicities. ]
Yet because I don’t agree with every single neoliberal position or worldview I am the racist and bad guy. I am the bad guy because I don’t agree with the neoliberal position of hating and wanting to kill off whitey.
Their political position is like an inquisitional tribune ready to attack or destroy anybody that doesn’t match 100% with their ideology. It is a political conformist ideology of mindless followers ready to attack others the moment anybody strays away from their beliefs.
I didn’t say anything like that. I literally just saw the guy and thought it would be interesting to talk about lmao. Didn’t realise it would turn you into a paranoid cry baby.
I have no interest in cancelling you or threatening you. Nor did my previous post express anything along those lines.
For future reference: if someone posts a link to some story, that isn’t a threat that they want what happened in the story to happen to you. Sometimes a link is just a link.
Your guys stance on tolerance is pretty laughable, I frankly find you people to be the most intolerable I have ever met. Likewise your belief in free speech is hilarious also, what you guys really believe in is free speech for only people who think like you do where if anybody disagrees with your positions you’re always the first ones to institute censorship on others.
Well that’s kind of why I posted the link. To talk about that. To see if you had something interesting to say about censorship in cases like that. I didn’t realise you’d take it as a threat
This is a philosophy forum, for people to discuss things like that.
How very interesting and quaint, perhaps you didn’t understand the thread subject being discussed here because you posted an article completely unrelated to what is being discussed in this thread.
But sure, we’ll ignore your post as being anything completely unrelated as a gesture towards me. If you’re going to be a thorn in my side at least be consistent.
I am a free speech absolutist, I believe censorship stifles debate. I believe a majority of forms concerning censorship or silencing the voices of others shouldn’t exist.
I believe public debate is the only way we can communicate as a society with one another mutually and likewise it is the only suitable way to progress.
