Mr Authoritarian's Basic Political Score Card

Philosophy Forums Society, Government, and Economics
1

There seems to be some confusion what my political beliefs are with my interactions with others on the forum here. I thought I might better explain what my political beliefs are.

  1. I am a very traditional conservative communist and Marxist culturally.

  2. I am an autocrat who believes in a singular individual leadership because I am a huge skeptic of democracy, I actually view democracy as being harmful to society. I believe the autocrat is like the CEO of a nation but where all citizens are the shareholders where the wealth of a nation should be enjoyed by its own national citizens. The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.

  3. I believe there should be in a well governed autocracy a sort of constitutional charter so that there is some semblance of balance between an autocrat leader and the rest of the national populace.

  4. I believe in universal healthcare and education.

  5. I believe in trade and occupational labor unions.

  6. I believe that homelessness shouldn’t exist and that nobody should go hungry.

  7. I am anti feminist. There should be no reason a majority of men cannot afford marriage or a family of their own.

  8. I believe in general public welfare especially for the handicapped and elderly.

  9. I am anti zionist.

  10. I unapologetically support white European identity. White European people should be able to express their cultural identity.

  11. I am a staunch nationalist, international cooperation or negotiation should be sought out but never at the expense of the national state.

  12. I believe nobody should ever face the prospects of long term unemployment, the government should have active organizations that help people find occupational and job placement that suits their needs.

2 Likes
2
  1. In order for multiracial or multiethnic society to work different ethnicities and races need to mutually respect each other. This means racial and ethnic disruptive agitators of any kind will not be tolerated.
  2. In order to create a more socially and political cohesive system of society I think setting up a variety of cultural ethnic neighborhoods or districts throughout the nation would be a good thing as an exemplary displayed form of multiculturalism and diversity. Cultural pluralism is the only way to go.
  3. I absolutely despise neoconservatism, neoliberalism, republicans, democrats, and libertarians. It’s all the same liberal mental disease as far as I am concerned.
  4. I believe workers, intellectuals, innovators, and philosophers should dominate society. Especially the working class because society is nothing without its hard workers. I believe strongly in labor and that people should have the benefits of their own laboring.
3

raises hand

Does that mean the same thing as “socialist republic“?

1 Like
4

Oh my gosh, are you those people spreading those pamphlets all over the campuses?

1 Like
5

You ARE a fascist!

1 Like
6

Is every ethnic and racial group welcomed & welcoming in these districts? If not, it’s just segregation.

1 Like
7

Define dominate, and how will you/society achieve this?

1 Like
8

No, there are no aristocratic republican senators in my ideal government system.

9

I am an agricultural worker all year long.

10

Totalitarian or authoritarian communist who is opposed to corporate fascism and the staged puppet political theater bought by money known as democracy.

In the independent cultural districts or neighborhoods I envision in the nation comprised of multiple different ethnicities, anybody can visit them but only people of that peculiar specific ethnicity within that district can own property or conduct business in them.

It would be the same as only Native Americans can reside in reservations holding property or conducting business on them, nobody else outside of the tribe can. Of course anybody can visit or travel through reservations.

The inner political party under the autocrat will be controlled by philosophers, workers, intellectuals, and innovators. The inner political party will be second in power after the autocrat.

11

I like these kinds of statements of belief. It makes things explicit for you, puts them side-by-side so you can see if they really fit together. And in a decade when your politics have inevitably evolved, you can look back at them and trace your path.

But it also makes things explicit for others, so they can understand you better and hold you to your beliefs, and in that it shows commendable bravery.

It’s funny that you use a shareholder metaphor, because corporate governance is itself a democracy: shareholders vote on corporate leadership, and directly or indirectly on who gets to be CEO.

I also think this misunderstands the benefit of democracy. Obviously a single noble and enlightened individual is better, the problem is that finding one and keeping their goals focused on the common good is very hard. Democracy is famously “the worst form of Government except for all those other forms that have been tried from time to time”. The check on a democratically elected leader is that they can be removed by the will of the people.

Of course, if the people stop caring about the constitutional charter, that stops working…

What happened to, “The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few”? Why no CEO of Earth?

This one is inscrutable to me, I don’t know what you mean by “feminist” such that these two sentences are related to each other. What exactly do you oppose?

These two were an interesting juxtaposition. But “zionist” has multiple meaning as well, so maybe you mean one that doesn’t just mean unapologetically supporting jewish identity? Or are you also opposed to white European ethnostates?

Some of your statements are about the structure of government, others about specific policies, and others about what the ideal society looks like. I think there’s probably a tension there – autocrats hate philosophers and intellectuals, labor unions discourage innovation and stoke ethnic resentment, and innovation is rapidly displacing workers.

That’s not unique to your policy platform, but I’m curious what you think about it. In a democracy, the ideal society is to some extent emergent: by voting for representatives and policies they like, the collective builds a society that (in theory) is the average of peoples’ ideals. In practice, peoples’ preferences are irrational and poorly informed, and both fail to achieve the society they desire and undermine democracy itself. But at least there’s no question of whether to prioritize the structure of government vs. policies vs. ideals. How does that work for your system?

Have you heard of futarchy?

1 Like
12

@Carleas

You have given me much to think about with your response, it will take me a few days to adequately respond to everything you said here especially with it being the end of my work week. I do however plan on giving you a lengthy response since you took the time to patiently write back to me.

1 Like
13

I have traced a path my entire life, as a youngster I started out as an idealistic democratic socialist, then I evolved into an anarchist, from there into a fascist, and after that to now present day a communist. It’s not like I became a communist or Marxist overnight, took a lot of soul searching and exploring to get where I am now in terms of mental wavelength. I also didn’t become autocratic overnight either, for me I came to that conclusion by watching almost thirty straight years of corrupt American democracy or political voting to know what a giant sham it all really is. Over several decades of observation I have come to hate and despise democracy with every fiber of my being.

There was a time when I was a young man that I would of shunned communism or Marxism growing up at the end of the Russian Cold War, but of course being older now seeing how the United States government lies just about everything I’ve come to like Marxism having actually studied it instead of listening to propaganda talking points telling me not to. What I’ve discovered is that everything capitalism says that it is nothing more than one giant organized lie.

For me I like honest open dialogue and debate, I like listening to what others believe in since by doing so I can construct a stronger belief system for myself by listening to the beliefs or opinions of others. I like knowing as much about everything that I can in formulating my own beliefs or opinions.

14

I meant it more in line of the autocrat being the visual leader or figurehead of a nation serving the best interests of the people by being the national protector guided by wisdom and where citizens should enjoy the collective wealth of a nation much like shareholders do in a company.

That is what citizens are, shareholders of the nation’s destiny. A good autocrat doesn’t serve the will of himself, he serves the will of the people and safe guards it. He serves the people’s will and public interests.

Of course for me as a communist I don’t think billionaires or corporations should even exist, for me everything would become state property where the only private property that exists is the basic necessities of life that all individuals should have. The nation state is what becomes that which we’re all shareholders of together.

Of course I don’t believe in democracy or voting, I believe a majority of people need protecting from themselves in that a majority of people are largely ignorant and uneducated. I believe besides an autocratic leader leading the nation there needs to be a group of intellectuals as well comprising of the inner political party structure who helps protect a nation from itself in terms of greedy radical individualism leading a nation astray into ruin.

For me democracy is nothing more than organized plutocracy or oligarchy, the political candidates always bought and paid for in preselection. The results already decided by big money before the first ballot is even casted. The illusion of free choice or options, the illusion that one has a verbal say in their own government. Democracy is a puppet theater of a stage filled by puppets bought and paid for by the ruling elite class.

15

I’m opposed to Marxism, but nice list, very interesting…!

1 Like
16

Cuz you’re both racist fascists.

1 Like
17

If you mean by “Racist” that I prefer my own kin to strangers, then yes, I agree.

But I am an Individualist, not Fascist. I have no pretenses in any “objectively true” government. Governments are mere reflections of their Demographies and Histories.

1 Like
18

…whereas the only objectively true government actually is the recognition-pivoting choices we make individually and together.

1 Like
19

Governments and Politics are institutions of Power, commanding Authority of matters of violence, war, life, and death. Military power is what gives nations autonomy. Without that, there are only slaves and servants. As such, expressions of Power are common in Nature, by specie and predation. Nature is overflowing with Hierarchies, predators and prey. Animals which can organize, rise or fall within their corresponding hierarchies.

Unlike Mr. A, I’m not so much a political idealist. If there were such things as “better governments” then they only arise Naturally, directly corresponding to their needs. As for me personally, I like a little bit of each form of government. There are always strengths and weaknesses to each. I do like some aspects of Democracy, because it allows for individual liberty and private property ownership. This is something I would disagree with the OP. But Democracies tend to extend from Republics first, which are ultimately grounded in Greek and Hellenic Philosophies. So to understand that government, it is necessary to understand that Governments come and go, rise and fall, live and die. That is why they are Re-Publics. Upon death, they must be reasserted again, and again.

The US Republic is the embodiment of our short, colonial history, and expansion / conquering of the New World, and its Injun population. It is an extension of our history of Enslavement. It is an extension of the Anglo and Sexon stock who originally founded it. By betraying a government, Treason, you best come up with a suitable or “superior” replacement. This is why I don’t necessarily fall toward political idealism, or even political radicalism demonstrated by today’s Far-left and Far-right movements.

Idealism is usually temperamental and temporary.

As for Communism… today’s Moscow, Ukraine, Belarus, Chinese Communist Party, these are all the fruits of that labor. Communist countries tend to be very poor. China is an exception, because the American Rightwing soldout US Steel and Manufacturing to China, in exchange for Corporate profits, since the 60s and 70s. American “Capitalism” has destroyed the American Middle, and now, Lower classes. Furthermore, Communism is also poor because international Jewry (world bankers), pulled their money from East Europe when Stalin purged the Bolsheviks and Trotskyites. Communism, like other Nationalistic and Socialist movements, need control over their State Banks… or they have to sell them out to Zionist (aka. Globalist) interests.

Socialist governments have limited political power, for that reason.

1 Like
20

Yep.
As I said a completely confused puppy.

2 Likes