No, you can give besides demonstrable evidence (none currently, merely hacking inti the DNC isn’t proof Russia hacked the voting booths and changed it) other forms that Congress and/or the Supreme Court would likely immediately disregard, given our common law emphasis of evidence, I can’t see parluanrntry proceedure in Congress or common law precedent for the supreme court ever in a million years accepting the heresay heterics of the left on mere fairness, as we pointed out several times, they have no standing, nothing appears to been done illegally by trump, public knew of the aquisations well in advance, no evidence at all of voting fraud by any foreign country has occurred, those arguments being rejected in several states officially.
Look this over, it is a short wiki:
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_(law
I can’t see a form of evidence being presented that survives first amendment scrutiny. It was given to wikileaks, given to the news media, openly discussed and debated for months. This isn’t even a after the election surprise, Hillary herself addressed this in the debates. The way people voted must have the higher validity, not a judge or Congress to overturn a legitimate election.
For a case like this, we would have to publically know the specifics of the hack, how we detected and diagnosed it as Russian, explain how it had to be them and not just wikileaks. Nobody would accept a closed door debate. Further, supreme court us half Republicans, half Democrats. If they can’t agree, Trump still wins. Hillary would need a overwhelming 5 judges who agree against all common law precedent that the here say hysteria is right, and that Trump’s factually correct statements are wrong in regards to his rights, then they would have to pull out of their ass completely a scheme for a reelection cycle, one we have no constitutional precedent for, then watch as Obama and Biden’s term expire, and hope to dear hell that acting President Paul Ryan goes along with this, or Congress accepts the supreme courts massive overstep of it’s powers.
Supreme Court can take any case, even brand new concepts and try them, but can’t come up with solutions outside of the scope of the constitution. Likewise, Congress can decide whatever if wants,but the supreme court will slap it all down if it doesnt fit the constitution.
99.99999% Trump is President, or Ryan becomes it until the House sats enough and makes Trump president.
Republicans control literally everything, and this can and us backfiring horribly for democrats. Everyone sees them as crooks, and is more justified than ever to investigate Hillary once in office. She is Cataline.