Infinity is an existent, If you destroy infinity of existents for an infinity amount of time, you are still; left with infinity, which is an infinite amount of existents for an infinite amount of time (there needs to be discernment of other for there to be an existent).
The term is supreme being, creator and sustainer…
But infinity cannot be destroyed, and extents therefor cannot be destroyed, and therefor not created, it’s self sustaining.
If the destruction of infinity is not endless, because you destroyed infinity, then you haven’t actually destroyed it because it’s not endless.
If endlessness is destroyed, you’d be left with end, but unless end is endless, it’s not actually itself, and thus an existent keeps existing.
If there’s no endless, then there’s no end to be endless, and no end is endless.
It’s like saying a lack of… everything; is also the lack of a lack of, which gives you a something… or everything back.
Existence itself is the one thing you cannot destroy after the fact, because you wouldn’t be here to destroy it in the first place, it never would have been or started.
What, you mean I don’t get infinite sex and pats on the shoulder for figuring this out?
I didn’t even use the word “nothing” in this proof. C’mon, it’s better than James proof of necessity of existence… This is good stuff here, I’m surprised no one replied. Maybe that’s just tacit agreement. I’ll admit, I look for some form of accolade when I do something good
The hindu saying is; if you take an infinity from an infinity, you are left with an infinity remaining.
This is the basis of calculus.
Thing is; how can you take an infinity out of an infinity? Where would you put it? Where did you get the cardinality which necessitates the initial duality required for two infinities or an otherwise split infinity? In other words, infinity is one. …that’s not it… The paradox is broken when place infinity in a circle within reality entire, and the world as another circle.
You then add the function of replication [and any/all others], and you can have as many infinities as you like. This then adds time and duplication as functions of replication, and you now have a driving force. That must always have been the case because you cannot as formerly suggested, produce anything from an infinity, ergo there had to be more than an infinite oneness.
God is probably the greater circle if anything? Then the kingdoms are within?
