Jupiter123 wrote:
The electromagnetic fields which saturate the cosmos are NOT tied to matter.So if all matter were to disappear into the holes at the centre of all the galaxies from which it all came then spinning holes would remain within the electromagnetic fields….yet again proving that the atheistic religious cult of mainstream +=- and -=+ philosophy science is fake.
And what if all the electromagnetic fields entered the holes leaving behind all matter? Would there just be spinning holes amongst a bunch of matter floating around? I suppose you’re right that an EM wave doesn’t need matter in order to propagate through the universe, but have you considered De Broglie’s principle that even matter particles behave like waves? In other words, there aren’t two things—matter and EM energy—there are only different kinds of particles and they all behave like waves sometimes and particles other times.
Jupiter123 wrote:
This religious cult is blatantly open that it is anti God and yet it has a statue of its god shiva displayed outside its religious HQ at CERN near Geneva…..How hypocritical is that.
From what I understand, that statue was a gift from India.
Jupiter123 wrote:
The religious cult of atheistic science claims that it’s science was initiated by magic because if it wasn’t then it’s +=- and -=+ starting philosophy is incorrect.Either way its clams are nonsense and not scientific at all.
I seriously doubt these guys whom you’re calling the “religious cult of atheistic science” believe in magic–these are the one’s who don’t believe in God or the soul, after all–but you might say their beliefs imply magic by some reasoning of your own. I have yet to hear your explanation for what +=- and -=+ is so I can’t say whether your reasoning implies that “science was initiated by magic” (you mean the universe?).
Jupiter123 wrote:
If you do away with the real deal then there will always be a false religion,philosophy and fake science that will take its place.
Well, I guess. I mean, people are always going to want to know the truth, and if you block the truth, they’ll find alternatives.
Jupiter123 wrote:
As all of the sciences are interconnected and the individual is totally embroiled within it all, if you honestly think that your BIASED religious beliefs and the resultant starting philosophy that you accept from this belief and which you use for the foundation of your science,is not really that important or related to science,then you are either desperately naive or desperately arrogant…it’s one or the other.
Why?
Because science is unbiased and balanced.
+=- and -=+ philosophy is biased/unbalanced.
+=+ and -=- philosophy is biased/unbalanced. ← Seems balanced to me →
+/-=+/- philosophy is unbiased/balanced.
Science is founded upon +/-=+/- philosophy.
Can one be unbiased and balanced in his or her views even though one is vehemently enraged at anyone who holds alternative views?
And for the record, I don’t know if you’re referring to me and my theory of consciousness when you lambast the fake magic atheist cult, but my theory is not science, nor does it depend on any particular science. Mine just interprets whatever science gives us in light of consciousness and experience.
Silenus wrote:
Before I’m banned…
Mind works on a binary code system - (1/0, good/bad, hot/cold, hard/soft, dark/light etc.)
The body works on a Quaternary code system (DNA)
Existence has a mutiple code system, including chaos which is the absence of any code.
Why does everyone want to boil the universe down to code? Was the Matrix really that good of a movie?
If you’re referring to neurons firing or not firing, that’s not binary. With computer circuitry, a line is either on or off (1 or 0). But a neuron has varying rates of firing. It could be firing slowly or very fast, and that can vary across time. And it needs to reach a certain threshold if it is to have an effect on connected neurons. It’s more analog than you think.
But if you insist on digitizing everything in nature–assigning “bits” to every instance of an energy exchange–my theory can work with that too. The “bits” in my theory are the specific qualities of experience. And there are an infinitude of them. If 1 and 0 is binary, and if DNA nucleotides are quaternary, then mind is infinitary. Yet I’m not so sure qualities are necessarily digital. Is there a minimum leap one has to take to go from one quality to the next? Say you were on the color spectrum at red. If you wanted to move to orange, is there a minimum delta in red that you would have to cross in order make your way towards orange, a minimum below which change is just not possible? Maybe there is, but I have no reason to think so.
Jupiter123 wrote:
Your physical body is made up of matter…..you can’t run away from it….you are stuck with it and embroiled within it and so you are a part of science.We’ll come on to consciousness later.
Yes, my body is definitely matter.
Jupiter123 wrote:
As with all matter,your physical body is made up of spinning electromagnets (which have N and S poles) at the quantum level.
Yes
Jupiter123 wrote:
The only way to keep these particles together to form your physical body is if you balance the electromagnetic force interactions NN,NS,SN,SS that exist right now between all these spinning electromagnets.You have to take account of all the interactions,NOT just half of them, in order to do this.
So what do u mean by interaction? What is an NN interaction? Is that when the North Pole of a particle makes contact with the North Pole of another particle? Does it matter what their spins are?
Jupiter123 wrote:
Therefore,the united formula for these 4 off interactions is N/S=N/S because the formula contains the 4 off attractive/repulsive ,PUSH/PULL (NN,NS,SN,SS interactions).Hence all the particles are held together to form your physical body which VIBRATES!!! All matter vibrates at varying frequencies ….including your physical body.
Yes, I think I got that part now. But the attractive/repulsive pushes and pulls are a consequence of charge. And maybe polarity and charge are the same thing (I’m no physicist) but I know that an electron has only one charge (-1/negative) even though it has two poles (N and S), at least if it’s spinning. Are you equating N with positive and S with negative? (Or visa-Versa?)
Jupiter123 wrote:
So we know how the physical body is held together.
Yes, but I think this can be explained just by charge (which is still binary), not polarity.
Jupiter123 wrote:
ALL matter is held together by the same principle.
Don’t forget gravity!
Jupiter123 wrote:
As I said, all matter vibrates at varying frequencies which is down to the spin speed of the particles which make it up.Increase the spin speed of the particles and the frequency of the NN,NS,SN,SS interactions increases.Decrease the spin speed of the particles and the frequency of the NN,NS,SN,SS interactions decreases.
Yes, you’ve mentioned how the spin of the particle determines the frequency of the EM waves it gives off. But the particle itself is a wave (right?). Does its spin also determine its own frequency?
And you know that spin is a conjugate variable in quantum physics, right? Which means it may not be determined. Which means that if what you are saying is true, it is only true when we measure it.
Jupiter123 wrote:
This increase/decrease in spin regulates the amount of heat emitted from the physical body/matter.
Well, there’s other things too. Frequency is just one measure of energy. There’s also amplitude. And also the number of photons.
Jupiter123 wrote:
All matter emits varying frequency electromagnetic energy waves therefore because the particles that make it up spin at different speeds.These energy waves contain binary data.The characteristics of the wave being unique to the matter type,
Yes, the frequency is unique to the material, but how does it carry binary data? The binary data, if I’m interpreting you correctly, is the North and South poles of the particles. But how does the frequency of EM energy it gives off tell us whether that’s NN, NS, SN, or SS? Or which direction it’s spinning?
Jupiter123 wrote:
The physical body mechanical sensors (senses) pick up these varying frequency electromagnetic energy waves and its internal mechanisms converts these analogue signals into binary digital signals (1/0’s).
Aren’t they already binary though?
Jupiter123 wrote:
These digital signals are what form the basis of the binary software programming for the physical body machine.
But like I said to Selinus above, the firing of neurons is not quite binary. And even if it was, that’s not quite the same binary as N/S.
But let’s say that at some fundamental level in the brain, you’re right. It’s all binary. All just neurons firing or not firing. You must understand that at higher levels, it becomes a lot more diversified and heterogeneous. Color perception alone gives us all the colors of the rainbow. How do you get all that qualitative diversity from such qualitative monotony, from 1s and 0s? My theory of equivalence explains this nicely.
Jupiter123 wrote:
+/-=+/- is the correct philosophy for everything therefore and NOT the religious cult of atheisms +=- and -=+ half logic philosophy which is presently adopted for all of mainstream science and which explains why it has all now failed.
I’m just gonna take your +/-=+/- to be the name of your theory. So the fake crap atheist religious idiot science philosophy of lies, destruction, and death must just be the science that says there is no God and there is no self. Other than that, however, it sounds like everything in your theory is based on science.
Jupiter123 wrote:
Stick to a balanced and unbiased reality philosophy science and psychology gib….it’s good for your mental health and well being.
Does my theory of consciousness count?
Selinus wrote:
Moron…a vibration is not back and forth - binary…you are retarded.
Actually, it kinda is… it’s back and forth, back and forth, repeated over and over again.
Selinus wrote:
I call it a oscillation, across multidimensional space.
Actually (again), all you need is one dimension… back and forth, back and forth.
Selinus wrote:
Positive negative are relative to the observer, moron.
Maybe the labels we use are, but the fact that an electron is -1 charge is pretty absolute. It’s not like one scientist is going to measure it to be -1 and another scientist is going to measure it to be +1.
Selinus wrote:
There is only order and chaos, referring to patterned and non-patterned energies.
Everything is not ordered, moron.
Chaos, the random factor, is what explains life and makes will necessary - advantageous.
What is will, imbecile?
The direction of movement…towards an objective.
Only life has such an intent - moron
But then wouldn’t that be order?
Selinus wrote:
Energy not participating in a organism, life - are governed by the path-of-least-resistance.
They move without intent…without an objective…without purpose.They move towards what is less resistant, like a river flows down a mountainside….MORON!
So wait a minute! Do you believe chaos to have NO order whatsoever, not even hidden order? You mentioned that chaos is unpatterned energies, which I thought was fair, but to say the energies of will and life don’t follow the path of least resistance suggests that they don’t follow the laws of nature. <— that’s more than just unpatterned. Do you believe the will and all of life are outside the natural order of things?
Selinus wrote:
Gawd…insane and an idiot….that’s a double whammy.
Of course he needs a god to make him feel better about the bad hand nature dealt him.
You mean the double whammy?
Selinus wrote:
See why you cannot get laid….moron?
Woaw, how do you know this? Jupiter, are you telling people about your sex life on ILP?
Selinus wrote:
Women a filtering agencies and your level of crazy is repulsive to them.
Maybe he just needs a woman with the same type of crazy. Or, sure, he could just call people morons, imbeciles and retards. Women love that.
Hey Jupiter, I’ve got an equation for you: Selinus=Magnus Anderson.
And (I suspect) you Jupe = Trixie.
But I still don’t know what +/- means. I get it has something to do with N and S, the labels scientists use to talk about the polarities of spinning particles. But you seem to want to say that if we pair + and - together with a / and then state that it is equal with itself (or a duplicate?), we’ve described the binary nature of the universe. I’m missing some in between pieces.
Just kidding. Run with it all you want. Just… give me time to respond.