I’m the one who’s largely responsible for the recent digression and I side with peacegirl on this particular issue.
I actually missed her post – precisely due to the minor digression that I made.
That’s what this forum currently is (not just this thread) and that’s what it has been for who knows how long. The time is ripe to move to a different one.
“What man actually needs is not a tensionless state but rather the striving and struggling for some goal worthy of him. What he needs is not the discharge of tension at any cost, but the call of a potential meaning waiting to be fulfilled by him.”
What I’ve been through only vaguely translates into human language. It’s like pulling out a dictionary and stupidly sitting there with a blind person and repeatedly reading the definition of the color green to them.
Unworthy interjection. Raise this to the level of conjecture and you may begin to feel/intuit what a 50% probability of a gamble it is to bet on, to decide between the tensioneless state and the struggling one .That near twilight state is enough to make a real gambler out of him, deliberately loosing to punish himself for posing the question in the first place of being on his toes.
The pessimism that drew out the unfortunate reaction was an ill advised overvaluation of capacity, not of the power in the willingness to do one’s duty.Nothing here nears moral compass, only duty framed against all odds.
Schopenhauer took a calculated gamble to reduce the stress of having to deal with tensionless state.
His pessimism was really a proverbial attempt to enjoy punishing himself and/or minimizing the extent of his guilt in exercising the decreased value inherent in that duty.
Nothing new, but commendable asset in the leveling of gambling game between assertion and denial of it for those restricted to commemorated competition.
What I’ve been through only vaguely translates into human language. It’s like pulling out a dictionary and stupidly sitting there with a blind person and repeatedly reading the definition of the color green to them.
What I’ve been through only vaguely translates into human language. It’s like pulling out a dictionary and stupidly sitting there with a blind person and repeatedly reading the definition of the color green to them.
So no.
[/quote
Yes, except someone has to say it.[/quote]
No. Someone has to move forward.
I took it on. After you’ve experienced what I’ve experienced… there’s no going back. It’s not an option and you cannot blackmail me. You will not stop me either. My only interest is everyone’s personal heaven forever. I know too much to stop.
I see/feel like you can trust me on it. The hell you describe is at Paar with mine, but any expiration comeasurement would involve more than what I could bear.
I trusted only one other person to share my journey into the deep underworld; I even shared it .
So me hurting anyone is an oxymoron when I would not even step on an insect.
So Ec rest assured. We are pretty much on the same page.