I’m in full protection mode. If a spirit comes after someone in full protection mode… the severity of the hell that will be rained upon that spirit is beyond human comprehension.
There are three things you do not do.
Violate the pleasurable exclusive access problem
Violate the negative zero sum problem
Violate the consent violation problem
And if you think you’re some type of badass (which doesn’t exist)
Do not under any circumstance fuck with a being who solved all those problems.
My karma was to be sent to hell for no reason.
Do you want to be sent to hell for no reason and every reason?
How do I put this delicately. Hell is pure imagination.
The imagination of people is greater than you comprehend.
I know because I’ve been there.
I’m an amazing heller.
The imagination of the best heavener is also the imagination of the best heller.
My training in hell. Is the best.
So. We have a situation here.
I’m offering the best plan. If the plan doesn’t change; I have the best training of how to hell someone.
I’m not too mean. My preferred way to hell someone is not hurting their physical body. I hurt their spirit.
Anyone who has any sense realizes that hurting a body brings wrath… but… that’s nothing compared to how you can torment a spirit. Hurting psyche is way worse than hurting flesh.
ecmandu i just want to stop in and remind you that even though you promised to delete your account if i beat you in a debate, and then you didn’t delete it after i beat you soundly, i still forgive you for lying because i’m the bigger person.
you were there. you remember. you just can’t admit it to yourself. but you lost, and i forgave you for not keeping your word because i’m the bigger person.
The only debate I recall with you was how all sex is mutual rape. You didn’t win that. You just declared yourself the winner.
Do you want to have that debate again?
Let’s recap.
Because of sex dimorphism, ornamental behavior by men makes females uncomfortable when you watch their micro expressions relative to men. this means that every woman on earth is a “no” for all ornamental behavior. The only thing that attracts females is ornamental behavior. That means no means yes for all heterosexual interactions from men to women.
That’s an extremely brief synopsis.
If you want to actually have this debate with me; you’ll lose; just like you lost before.
Ec & Mr. R, dimorphism happens through (pressured?) selection, no? Who does the selecting (part of the dimorphism?)? Willful factor in humans (increasing over time/culture?)?
All evolved traits “happen through” selective pressure, but that does not mean that we can easily understand them through that, not does it mandate specific results. You have to know about the environment. But also you have to accept that the vast majority of traits, after millions of years, only have a passing relationship to the selective pressures that once made them part of the organism’s arsenal.
Most traits therefore convey no particular advantage in a way that more or less dimorphism might be specially indicated.
I’m pretty sure humans would persist and thrive with a lot more dimorphism and could just as easily thrive on almost none.
Homosexuals still seek to be parents and make damn good ones in my experience.
And the provision of a baby requires zero dimorphism beyond the fact that an egg and sperm have to be hosted by a womb. I’m pretty sure it could be possible to transplant a womb into a man, and he would respond well to the hormones of nurture that the experience would provide.
Right now I would be prepared to argue that less masculinity would be of great benefit to the world.
He meant only exclusive sex, cuz pleasurable exclusive access. So analogous to religious exclusivity, and class warfare. Oops. I forgot I don’t respond to sex analogies.
[Something tells me Sculptor is prepared to argue any position, but that’s none of my business.]
Really? There isn’t enough of it? This forum is already feminine, way too feminine. Just take a look at the last several posts in this thread. Take a look at Ecmandu, Ichthus, Meno, yourself [Sculptor], Kropotkin . . . all very feminine minded individuals. Do we really need more of that? Beside that, the complete lack of moderation, and the stubborn refusal to moderate, is also quite feminine. This forum should really be called “I Love Feelosophy” because that’s precisely what it is.
Oh. I can beat you on that. Psychopathy of course is on a spectrum just like autism.
Sex invariably hurts someone else’s feelings.
The definition of psychopathy is hurting another while you’re having fun.
Sex always does this. You did not beat me in that debate. That’s what I said back then and you had no counter argument. You just declared yourself the winner.
No it does not Ecmandu when two people have a desire to please the other even more than themselves. You’ve had a bad experience which has formed the foundation of your philosophy. Please start a new thread dedicated to this and let my thread stay on track, which may not even be possible unfortunately!
Peacegirl: This has become a wastebasket thread. I can’t make any headway because it has gotten derailed by others who have no interest in the subject matter. I introduced this discovery with hopeful intentions to no avail. It’s a slap in the face!
You haven’t responded in any intelligible way to my well reasoned posts… asides always happen in threads. It’s only a derail if you aren’t smart enough to address arguments in your own thread.
I’m fully prepared to discuss my learning curve argument with you.
No. Now your narcissism shows.
I MEAN !!! It hurts other people BESIDES the two people having sex.
You are obviously a psychopath.
You violate the pleasurable exclusive access problem.
And… people felt entitled to talk about something else here because you refuse to answer everyone else’s long earned wisdom (not just mine) when you post here. It’s up to you to stay on topic in your own thread.
