_
Reposted, for better visibility…
I think the scaremongering of AI and transhumanist-tech, has peaked, and now will hopefully start troughing.
Why this guy isn’t worried about AI, and what I’ve been saying for the last few years […stated in the first 2.5 minutes of the video]
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQefdkl8PfY[/youtube]
[/quote]
‘Nationalism’, another modern ideology like its counterpart ‘liberal democracy’, is largely a spook.
Like liberal democracy it looks good on paper (‘every people/ethnicity is entitled to sovereignty over their native land, and to not have it flooded with migrants’), but rarely so in practice.
Russia isn’t even nationalist on paper, again it’s ‘Eurasianist’.
Russia has a right to rule Ukraine and, at least 10 other countries.
Ukrainians, even tho they have their own language, church, culture and ethnic identity, are just a social construct, an excuse for the west to break up Russia, according to the Russian government and RT; Russia Today; Russian state media.
Ukrainians and Ukraine are just Russians and Russia.
And so I doubt they’ll stop at the Donbass (which’s largely ethnically Russian).
If they have an opportunity to take the whole of Ukraine and assimilate them all, they probably will.
And so globalism by consent or conquest is the name of the game, from the ancient world to the modern, different excuses, same project, every state expands as much as it can, BRICS is just the latest incarnation/manifestation.
From Persia, Macedonia and Rome to our present day.
I’m simply pointing out that influential power has shifted.
It’s no longer in the hands of dictators such as Stalin and Hitler. At that point technology was relatively modest. It didn’t capture the power it does today.
Technology has obviously since expanded and advanced.
Now powerful people and even organizations are guided by technology. People and organizations function for the advancement and maintenance of technology as much as if not more so than the species itself.
When Elon and the media claim “the next stage of human evolution”:
futurism.com/elon-musk-is-looki … cking-tech
…what they are actually claiming is the next stage of technological evolution.
Notice the distortion of terms there?
Humanity is not growing a better appendage. Humanity is not increasing human brain capacity.
It is not an example of humanity itself advancing or evolving. It is an example of technological advancement, an example of technological integration. It is an example of technology advancing, of technology evolving.
The terms are already confused. Humanity and technology are already apparently indecipherable. We see the merging of biology and tech figuratively and literally.
I watched the first three minutes.
I agree, we are essentially consciousness or awareness. Awareness is awareness and we are it.
As for us being “avatars of the one awareness exploring all its possibilities through different avatars”? That sounds a little theatrical. A little too much sauce.
It’s quite simple. We are existence experiencing itself.
Concerning consciousness, consciousness is a chemical-energy process.
Consciousness concerns chemicals and energy. What else would consciousness be? A ghost? An apparition? A cosmic soul? A distribution of soul spread over a network? I’m not intending to be silly, I am posing questions to help clarify and illustrate the point. Just because it cannot be thoroughly explained now does not suggest it is some mysterious, godly apparition of theatrical proportion.
In other words if chemicals, if matter and energy can be arranged to produce consciousness, as it obviously can, then matter and energy can be arranged to produce consciousness. One can follow from that premise.
Regardless, whatever consciousness may be defined as it is part of existence. Likewise with a simulation. Simulation or not it’s all existence. A simulation would extend from something or from some things. The simulation, and every thing else it concerned, would be parts of existence.
Personally I’m not too concerned with A.I. domination. I already view the civil system as enslavement.
But I will point out Hoffman states he’s not too concerned with A.I. “right now”. Right now. That’s quite a significant qualifier. A.I. is barely in its infancy.
Will also mention A.I. regulation, or A.I. scaremongering, may be used as excuse to further regulate or scrutinize the general public so the public should be cautious.
As the singularity is reached and surpassed the semblance of sentience may cause an catastrophic inversion to the reversing the effects of de massification, robots against robots willl form cycles of
regrouping into two major camps, one that strives to adapt eschotologically predetermined by and not deterred , any quantified limit of social comtrol
China foresaw this ‘ process decades ago when she tried to control population, in those early days , foreshadowing the present, but out of sync, -
The inversive semblance that the alternate reality creates axiomatically, becomes a flash point around some say a generation away, and that is when social control, and a new found ; this spotty description results from various forces of diametrically opposing reactions, but assuredly safe in a state of presupposed neutrality .
The middle way, AAA the golden rule or any variations thereof, is the place of being in that center of the hurricane , where poison turns into medecine
That this process the just birthed AI could and did foresee in the decade of the 40’s -50’s . in fact ever since the publication of Brave New World, is apparent in I’d synonomic pre- shadowed title within the generally conflate able political designation; The New World Order
Thirdly, but really secondly, the imperative to express necessity overcomes the bars that prevent a language come into that ground, which may come through by force of will, in fact the extra - ordinary to reveal it’self , that wills it’s power through in-it’s self, beyond the values usually associated with conventional rhetoric.
In this here realm all is permitted, no poetic liscence needed to divine into the abysmally absurd.
Can go to boundaries as they preclude then include the changing eschotologically reviewed gaps along the way, and where the line separating borders can try to eliminate the horrid social schizotype from forming a horror of myopia, but the terror of that! My goodness, .
Overrides that point of contention as well, being forthright about that as well.( Oh why have you abandoned?… over and over news travels over millennia
Now to still worried conscious conscience, Tina Turner along the same lines, talked to another, not really objectively either illustrating the possible meaning beneath her dream of keys.
But may hav been more proper to include at least some of this in another format, ‘Vignets’ and / but found it improper toward another sensitive namely Arc, who may have there of have possibly gotten a wrong impression.
But now, having said that, will abandon this here in quiery/examination and follow up in ‘vignettes’
The New, New World Order is already taking shape.,
A violent reaction to Americanism’s New World Order = open borders, open markets, culture-of-no-culture, one world government controlling masses of non-racial, non-gendered, in time non-sexual, non-species, masses of madness.
Culture reduced to a product along with identity and ideology and god…and Everything.
Products to be bought and sold on the open markets by wandering Jew-like minions seeking salvation where the ‘grass is greener’…
Agreed in part, but the fact that the American empire is not likely to just fade into insignificance, because let’s face it there is quantum power difference between Rome, even the Brit empires, since primarily there is a cost to proclaim a similar tactic to exit an organization like the US hegemony, that is you could be darn sure the price tag consists of guaranteed buy into outsourced and copied investment opportunities.
The ‘developing countries’ involved, may or may not have been aware of the fine line at the bottom of the page, guaranteeing up and beyond control ownership, the least understood facility which the US has developed to a tooth.
It started with international corporations, and involved multi level organizational and directorial processing of most aspects of productive capability.
So the worry over a new pseudo colonial exit are way way premature, Even Russia and China have to know these foundementaks, and if the do not, they are processing a race where breat rabbit can indeed win the race, while the turtles chug along expecting it will not wake up to march it’s uninterrupted albeit retarded march to the goal line.
However, such statements do not make the problem disappear.
You may say: ”I have nothing against weapons.“ But I say to you: ”You mean weapons as such, yes, they are harmless as such, because they only become dangerous when they are used. But who uses them? The owner! And if there are only a few owners of weapons, then they can use the weapons to keep other people under control.“ It is the same with AI. Replace ”weapons“ with ”AI“. AI is owned by very few (too few!) people. These people have illegally usurped patents and licenses and then forbade all other people to have patents and licenses in this area. In this criminal way, the very (too) few AI owner have bcome able to control, enslave all other people through AI.
Do you know what it means to have a chip in your brain? This chip is programmed to control you in any (any!) direction. You can no longer control yourself.
The very (too) few AI owner want to digitize the whole planet, thus also each animal and each human.
Heidegger, who was also not against technology, warned against the misuse of technology by man as early as the 1930s, and indeed since he had established (1934) what National Socialism was really all about.
Since 1917/1933, three isms (titanomachia) competed with each other for a humanly disguised world domination: the National Socialism of Germany, the Americanism of the United States, and the Bolshevism of the Soviet Union. At first it seemed as if National Socialism would win, then, because Germany lost the 2nd World War against the allied Americanism and Bolshevism (both benefited greatly from German technology), National Socialism fell out of the competition for the time being, and it looked as if Bolshevism would win, but it lost the Cold War against Americanism and also fell out of the competition for the time being, so that it seemed as if Americanism would have won the competition of the three for world domination, but we have known at least since the beginning of the financial crisis (1998, especially 2007/2008) that Americanism has not triumphed either, but the privatism of a few who - quite privately - secured world power, and money helped them to do so, but also digital technology, both of which are also connected to each other - privately, of course. In the said financial crises and most recently in the corona crisis, privatism clearly showed its world domination.
For Heidegger, the competition of the three said isms for world domination was only a consequence of the Occidental metaphysics of technology, of Machenschaft (poorly translated into English as ”machination“), and that also means: of the will to will, of the absolute subjectivity, which abuses technology for only itself, its power.
Ned Ludd may have said: ”I am not against the steam engine as such, but whoever has power over the steam engine can also tell me what to do and what not to do. So I am destroying the steam engine, even though I have nothing against the steam engine as such, but only against its owners.“
History repeats itself and yet does not repeat itself.
We have an universe that is supposed to grow to infinity.
We have a technology that is supposed to grow to infinity.
We have a science that is supposed to grow to infinity.
We have money that is supposed to grow to infinity.
We have an economy that is supposed to grow to infinity.
We have a policy that is supposed to grow to infinity.
We have a civilisation that is supposed to grow to infinity.
We have a liberalisation that is supposed to grow to infinity.
We have a re-/education that is supposed to grow to infinity.
And so on.
We have an inner world that is supposed to grow to infinity too.
Have you noticed anything?
It is true that the widespread view that brain activity causes conscious experience has so far proven to be intractable in terms of scientific explanations. BUT: The reverse view is also wrong. In fact, it is even more wrong. It is as wrong as nothing can be more wrong.
The ism behind the idea that consciousness causes brain activity and actually creates all the objects and properties of the physical world is called solipsism. What is commonly understood by reality cannot be a reality created by consciousness. Denying what is commonly understood to be reality does not change this. Either there is reality or there is not reality. Hoffman says that reality does not exist and that realityt exists - that statement is a contradiction, so it is false. He says that reality is only feigned by consciousness, thus that there is consciousness, that consciousness is reality (he calls it ’conscious realism‘) - and that statement is a circle, so it is false too.
It is as if Hoffman has separated the subject/object dualism in such a way by passing off the subjective as the objective that creates the objective. But then it would only be the subjective again. Only now you can also call it the objective. But what does Hoffman gain from an epistemological point of view? Nothing. On the contrary. He outs himself as a solipsist who hides solipsism behind an apparent objectivity, supposedly created by a subject.
This is not changed at all by the fact that Hoffmann calls the subject ’consciousness‘ (also wrongly called ’spirit‘ or ’soul‘/’psyche‘) and ’reality‘ or ’realism‘.
Hoffman has no solution to offer, but only makes the problem much bigger.
Counterthesis to Hoffman’s ”thesis“ (which is not new at all). I am now doing a thought experiment by putting forward the thesis that reality exists, but consciousness does not exist (and neither do the other, partly older candidates: spirit, soul/psyche). Where should the consciousness be? Show me! Where should the spirit, where should the soul, where should the psyche be? At least not in the body. But not outside the body either. Show me! You can’t. In other words, the consciousness does not exist, at least not in the way tradition tries to inculcate it in us. We should no longer call it consciousness, but just knowledge - like before. Knowledge is basically like consciousness - with one difference: it lacks the typical modern assumption of being an instance, a thing, an object in order to hand it over to technology. We don’t need an instance, a thing, an object for what we call knowledge. It is simply knowledge, and it is based on language, whether semiotic, linguistic, philsophical, mathematical or otherwise scientific!
The personal situation replaces the closed private inner world of psychologistic-reductionist-introjectionist objectification in all its guises, not only the soul/psyche but also consciousness.
It was the mistake of the theorists of consciousness to assume a consciousness with numerical multiplicity of many contents of consciousness and their arrangement, instead of an ambivalently manifold consciousness which, in infinite indecision between simplicity and multiplicity, is very well able to have many individual subjects or objects at the same time and to distinguish them sharply. A model of the body has been projected from the external world into an internal world that does not exist, with all the individual contents of consciousness as particles or figures in it, the mind that Hume compared to a theatre.
And now Hoffman even wants consciousness to be the only remaining reality? This is an even greater solipsism than the old one already was. Solipsists belong in the closed ward of the madhouse.
Hoffman should rather have dealt with the question of being, as did the one who can be heard and seen in the following film:
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vcm05b8m6tQ[/youtube]
Again: I am now doing a thought experiment by putting forward the thesis that reality exists, but consciousness does not exist (and neither do the other, partly older candidates: spirit, soul/psyche). Where should the consciousness be? Show me! Where should the spirit, where should the soul, where should the psyche be? At least not in the body. But not outside the body either. Show me! You can’t. In other words, the consciousness does not exist, at least not in the way tradition tries to inculcate it in us. We should no longer call it consciousness, but just knowledge - like before. Knowledge is basically like consciousness - with one difference: it lacks the typical modern assumption of being an instance, a thing, an object in order to hand it over to technology. We don’t need an instance, a thing, an object for what we call knowledge. It is simply knowledge, and it is based on language, whether semiotic, linguistic, philsophical, mathematical or otherwise scientific!
[tab]And: We don’t need no re-education either!
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T38Y81FBEcQ[/youtube][/tab]
„Diese totale Weltbeherrschung ist erstens eine Fiktion, und zweitens ist sie auch prinzipiell unmöglich. Denn wenn ich recht habe mit meinem inzwischen schon mehrfach formulierten Beweis dafür, daß es keine Sache gibt, von der sämtliche Bestimmungen einzeln sind. Wenn alle Bestimmungen einzeln wären, dann wäre alles unbestimmt, jede Bestimmung unmöglich.“ (Hermann F.-H. Schmitz).
Translation:
”This total domination of the world is firstly a fiction, and secondly it is also impossible in principle. For if I am right in my proof, which has already been formulated several times, that there is no thing of which all determinations are single. If all determinations were single, then everything would be indeterminate, every determination impossible.“
„Dieses Denken der Vollendbarkeit der Digitalisierung beruht auf dem Grundsatz der durchgängigen Bestimmung, den Kant eingeführt hat, der besagt, daß jedem Etwas von jeder beliebigen Bestimmung entweder diese zukommen muß oder diese fehlen muß. Das ist nicht der Satz vom ausgeschlossenen Dritten. Denn der Satz vom ausgeschlossenen Dritten muß mit der Unentschiedenheit und der Spältigkeit umgehen. Man muß nur den Gegenstandsbereich weit genng fassen, dann bleibt der anwendbar, nur eben auf das Zweifelhafte, in seiner Zweifelhaftigkeit. Das kann man aber durch leichte Umformulierung erreichen. Dieser Grundsatz der durchgängigen Bestimmung, der ist falsch. Und das wäre das Axiom der durchgängigen Digitalisierbarkeit und Zersetzbarkeit der Situationen. Das wäre der Grundsatz … Und da dieser Grundsatz falsch ist, ist die Digitalisierung nicht zur absoluten Perfektion zu bringen. Jede Sache hat Bestimmungen, die nicht einzeln sind.“ (Hermann F.-H. Schmitz).
Translation:
”This thinking of the completeness of digitalisation is based on the principle of continuous determination introduced by Kant, which says that every something of any determination must either have it or lack it. This is not the theorem of the excluded third. For the theorem of the excluded third must deal with the indecision and the sparseness. One must only define the subject-matter broadly enough, then it remains applicable, only to the doubtful, in its doubtfulness. But this can be achieved by a slight reformulation. This principle of universal determination is wrong. And that would be the axiom of the universal digitalisability and decomposability of situations. That would be the principle … And since this principle is false, digitalisation cannot be brought to absolute perfection. Every thing has determinations that are not single.“
Nonsense like this is why no one cares about philosophy.
“If a thing is lacking then it has a total lack, but cannot be totalizable in its necessary totality under domination because it cannot be totally determined as lack, which indetermination follows the rule of co-occurring difference-reduction which makes it impossible in principle to know if that which is lacking is determinable in so far as being that which is lacked, or if it must be indeterminate by a more complete continuous application of theoretically decomposable situations. That which is indeterminate is not impossible but in theory is almost impossible in principle when no thing is determinable as single from all angles. The impossibility of the decision to identify the lack as continuous impossible determination leads to a universal reformulation of applicable completeness in thinking, which is itself wholly indeterminate upon the cusp of a theoretical total domination which is in itself totally impossible. Therefore I am smart and u are dum case closed gg no re ups pay me bithc.”
I bet that when Rome was in decline any talk about this empire ending - an empire that was supposed to last a thousand years - caused mocking laughter in what remained of Rome.
Conspiracy theories.
The average Roman could see no decline. Everything seemed normal, as long as he was alive he could not discern any difference.
What was changing was fashion, and that was normal.
Generations produce their own trends, to differentiate themselves from the previous generations.
Rome was becoming more exotic, more demographically diverse…what’s the problem?
It’s to be expected when you are the Global Empire…the world itself.
Cigar Stream #189: The Cultural Cold War .
Those “Trotskyites” that turned against Stalin, became the neo-cons.
They turned against Putin, for the same reasons, after what he did to the “oligarchs,” most of which, if not all, were genitally-mutilated, coincidentally.
All but the brainwashed don’t see the pattern.
These Straussean trained genitally-mutilated ones run the Biden white-house, as they did the Obama, and Bush, and Clinton…and Trump…all the way back to Kennedy and Nixon when they had a lower effect, since Anglo-Puritan WASPS had not committed cultural suicide then…going back to Wilson.
Lest we forget when and who established Hollywood, fabricating what we currently consider, America.
As technologies advance and their control increases and spreads to Media and Banking, the effect increases.
Can anyone find a WASP in the Biden white-house in any position of authority, other than the puppet Biden himself?
:-"
Two factions that are, currently, at odds.
One represented by Biden - encompassing both the democrats and the majority of the Republicans; and the other represented by trump, another puppet for the other faction, the one representing the minority in the Republican party, but the majority among the Republican followers who are mostly Caucasians.
Their conflict is over how to manage America’s decline from Hyperpower to regional power, before the end.
The stronger faction - neo-con - wants to continue with the strategies employed after the end of WWII, viz., perpetual warfare, destabilization, regime changes, appropriation of other nation’s natural and human resources, selling Democracy & freedom to the masses when they are an authoritarian oligarchy of the morally superior ‘chosen’, and finally practicing messianism, tolerating no alternate system, no alternate spirituality, no alternate ideology.
Trump’s weaker faction wants to consolidate America’s power so as to endure the coming Multipolar world order, ushered in by China and Russia, gaining ground among the world’s second- and third-world nations - those that were pillaged of resources to create America’s wealth and consumerism; equating pleasure with truth, and rejecting all biological/natural identifiers.
Abstract art, or fArt as I call it, is part of the gradual detachment of the masses from reality, leading us to the present crisis of identity and the use of language to undermine and nullify the natural world, i.e., reality.
A neurological vacuum is created separating body form mind, or the ideal from the real, or the sensorily perceived tangible from the noetically constructed intangible.
Words no longer act as mediators between the thought ([size=80]noumenon[/size]) and the act ([size=80]phenomenon[/size]), but serve as the point of disconnection and inversion of the experienced world, i.e., nihilism.
Firstly, let’s not forget or 4get India, who has successfully landed on the far side of the moon, just today, after US, Russia and China.
For that ‘reason’ the state of the world is not bastioned by a triple alliance of responding to grievances, but a much more formidable extra dimension of symbolic power, as a representative of new power immersion into the acid wash of who is who on the world stage.
The hyper power motive this has gained more stability, appearently giving rise to a social relaxation with the calculated risk associated with what if that search for the median were to go afoul.
The abstraction of form from content -ious patterns and colors, is a primal example of relievingg Straussian analytical superior analogically wring in, the Hollywoodish prefigured black film has denigrated the self fulfilling lily expected neo-colonialism to last, far longer then the paradoxically ambiguous colorfully vanishing imagination, bravo, all things do not add value just cause the hues are enriched.
Abstraction can not bring this type of non sense into critical mode, simply because it has been lifted from the analogically state into a radical binary set of signal, readily assembled and embellished with appropriate gusto, by all factions’ hidden union thereof.
Humbling opinion is effective, not only by means of attack on Abrahanism, but simply by reason of avoiding MAD, reason enough to extend Cold War foilige of containment to spread elsewhere, by the techne of limits to shared info. Secured by highest forms of vigilance.
Putin is squirming that he can not attain the unattainable earlier variables, leading to mythical prescriptions such as reactive MCarthyism red baiting, deux constructions leaving a trail of conspiracies duly revised and mopped of to the disadvantage of modern non hysteria s, who died pitiful deaths along the way.
The dynamic of pre World War Two expressed by non other than Hitler that the state of critical dynamic that remained unresolved by the treaty of Trianon remains still sustained even after Versailles up to the present.
It is unarguable that all this has been pre set by said’nei con. Seems leveled out .
As Putin successfully carries out his back-up plan - once forcing Ukraine to capitulate and become a neutral state failed due to American interventions - of denazification and demilitarization of Ukraine, American’s dominant neo-con elites are in a panic.
They scramble to intervene and stop BRICS expansion and de-doralization, from being implemented.
BRICS has already surpassed G7 in population and economics.
They unsuccessfully attempt to seduce Saudi Arabia, and India, convince them to abandon their agreements with China and Russia…they even try with Venezuela, after decades of sanctions and interventions…the latest attempt by Nulan - the chosen - attempting to intimidate Niger.
All but the brainwashed Americanised christ-cucked cannot see what is going on, entirely immersed in America’s Hollywood and Media propaganda machine.
What was supposed to undermine all resistance to Americanism, via Hollywood and Media selling degeneracy and hatred for the natural, has now backfired.
Americanism is exposed as duplicitous, practicing the opposite of what it preaches - forcing it to abide by its own globalizing principles.
This, in effect, accelerates its decline since it has no solid ethnic or cultural core - based entirely on an abstraction, i.e., ‘freedom,’ which many Americans now completely deny, opting for Abrahamic determinism - making it particularly vulnerable to its own policies of open-borders, open-markets, no biological identifiers, individualism with no collective identity, culture-of-no-culture, where all identity is a product to be purchased on the markets.
This is what the circumcised handlers of Trump realized and are attempting to stop.
But, like all ideologies, Americanism has a momentum of its own - its messianism cannot be arrested.
As the only nation to have ever used atomic weapons - WMD’s - despite not having any reason to, ironically - it is directing the world towards Armageddon, projecting its own Abrahamic world-view upon mankind.
An Empire of Lies, and liars, is an empire that rewards successful confidence exploiters and manipulators - con-men.
Everything from Hollywood, American media, and Marketing - Bernays style - is founded on exploiting gullibility and manipulating psychology with lies.
They have an entire industry based on fabricating and selling fantasies to the world’s desperate degenerates.
Just compare what the US media was saying about Putin last year.
He was ill, he is dying, Russia is running out of shells, missiles, ammuinitions…then think of the bullshyte sold to the world in order to justify an invasion of Iraq, or to bomb Libya back to the Stoneage…and don’t forget the 9/11 assessment, the Kennedy assassination narratives.
Did they bring Democracy to Iraq, to Libya, to Serbia, to Afghanistan, to Nicaragua, to Syria, to Vietnam…where exactly have they ever succeeded or told the truth about their true motives?
How many regimes have they toppled and replaced with puppets…was it only Zelenskyy?
Yet, these Americanised, indoctrinated, dimwits, cannot stop believing the narrative of lies.
It’s the same kind of psychosis that makes them believe the Bbible is a source of absolute truth.
Followers, hedonists, degenerates …they just seek pleasure, comfort and happiness.
Well, these sentences that I wrote last even contradict at least partially the sentences I wrote before. But good. That’s life. Full of contradictions. It is important to educate them where possible and to pick them up.
But: Nonsense? You do not know what you are talking about. What you say, without knowing it, is equivalent to demanding that philosophy must become mathematics or another science. But if philosophy is mathematics or another science, then philosophy is no longer philosophy. That is logical. Have you understood that at least to some extent?
Again: Nonsense? No, it is completely thought-out philosophy. Completely because it does not only start from the human being and also not only from the adult human being, as philosophy has done almost exclusively in the past. Philosophy is on the retreat because those of its disciplines that have become corrupt prevent that it can get beyond or back to certain issues, e.g. to the simplest things, as phenomenology/existential-philosophy/fundamental-ontology and the new phenomenology have been doing as exceptional philosophical disciplines of the time since the beginnig of the 20th century. So there were and are exceptions. In other words, the philosophy is still attractive. Its only problem is that it is not as powerful as those who misuse science (also parts of philosophy) and technology.
So if the exceptions of philosophy will have perished (whenever that will be in the future), then and only then philosophy as a whole will also have perished (thus not before).
Heidegger was right when he said that philosophy was at an end and that he called his philosophy only thinking. It was clear to him that the question to which he had devoted himself for so long could be answered by technology, because Sein (being) could be revealed through the technology of Dasein (being there, existence, man).
When philosophy will have been completely absorbed into the scientific disciplines (just as all scientific disciplines have previously detached themselves from philosophy), then philosophy will have completely disappeared. But until then, we will keep going. Without resistance, but with calmness. – But what if thinking will also have disappeared by then? 
The restriction of the domain of the numerical manifold in the general manifold puts a stop to the hypertrophy of the Pythagorean thought that everything is equal to number or is ordered according to number, measure and weight, and thus to the ever stronger attempt in life to give number dominance over thinking - culminating in the cry for digitalisation - which can refer thinking back to the foundations of manifoldness.
That is philosophy!
If philosophy were mathematics, then it would follow numerical manifoldness alone, i.e. it would be something like numerism, which always confirms mathematics and fights or ignores philosophy.
So it is exactly the opposite of what you say without knowing it.
Philosophy would no longer be philosophy if it were mathematics.