What are you doing, creep?
You have an alleged child abuser as your avatar, as a joke. What is wrong with you?
1 Like
Calling me a creep? 
Go spend some time with your wife and family. I don’t have either.
I explained the statements and the intent.
1 Like
I am trying to understand where you’re coming from but you have to be more clear in how you present things. Ultimately I am trying to help you.
I will spend my own time however I see fit. 
.
You are an animal competing against me and others with a feigned sense of righteousness. Send me $500. That would help. And I’ll give it to a neighbor who needs it.
1 Like
@Maxx Here’s your individual egoism bro, what it naturally devolves into.
Feigned righteousness? Nope, you’re pretty far off the mark.
$500.00? I am not a charity fund buddy boy.
Your efforts here are merely negotiations for influence utilizing propaganda and sociopolitical avenues.
1 Like
Each major global organization follows a similar structure. Governing bodies, financial institutions and corporations have many employees occupying low-level positions with little knowledge of what’s going on or what the organization is really about. Further up the organization are less and less people with more and more power, the most powerful being executives and so forth.
All of those organizations have similar peaks of power. Those top individuals, through class relations and shared business interests, work together to maximize and sustain their advantages. This manifests in various ways in different parts of the world, some see it as crony capitalism, others see it as governmental corruption. It’s all of the above. It’s a push for consolidation of power through any and all economic and political means.
The powerful work together to secure their interests. It’s readily observable. Do corporate CEOs fight in war or die in battle? Do they work the night shift on Saturdays? What about venture capitalists? What about governors or Presidents? Of any nation? The elite are simply the peaks of wealth and power of the interconnected global system. They are separated from the rest of society. They do not fight or die in wars and they do not work in factories. The masses do, and the elite manage them like cattle on a global scale.
Simply observe Putin and Zelensky. Thousands upon thousands have been slaughtered and those two march around in front of cameras like celebrities. They are the peaks (or near) of political power.
The global powers don’t need to conspire; the organizational trends of the species allow these dynamics. Each human population, regardless of socioeconomic arrangement, has a peak of power. That person or group is protected, removed from normality, while subordinates are sacrificed, exploited and managed. It plays out similarly around the world. The peaks of power, the global elite, are systematically sustained, lavished and protected while the subordinates are subject to countless indignities. It isn’t even conspiracy theory.
Regarding a solution that is suggested in closing of my essay. A solution is obviously difficult to offer. First we must communicate and discuss these ideas which should be easy now that we have the internet. We must bring these ideas and discussions to the forefront.
Many question the socioeconomic system. Is it the system, or is it the species?
In a way we’re all accelerationists now, people from all political or philosophical beliefs because we all know the corrupt players in power by now and we all know nothing is going to change until they’re out of the way. I get it and agree.
How do you reconcile your idea that we are heading for a “secretly emerging totalitarian world government” with the two possible outcomes you give - replacement or extinction?
following through your logic, either this totalitarian government rules over no one while consisting of no one, or it rules over a non-human species .
Since a government cant consist of no one, it would have to be the latter. So your idea must be that there will be a government ruling over nonhumans. Do you have an idea what kind of beings these will be? And do you think that this government consists of humans, or also of nonhumans?
1 Like
It won’t even be a government, corporations and banks are more powerful or wealthy than entire national governments are at this point.
At some point entire nations or governments will merge becoming corporations. In the future the entire world will be ruled by five different corporations and after all that through business competition overtime eventually the entire world will be ruled by one singular Umbrella Corp worldwide which will become the defacto world government.
That’s where our democratic liberal capitalism worshipping camouflaged fascism is fastly approaching. This kind of corporatist mindset sees different nations, cultures, ethnicities, peoples, and beliefs as a hindrance to its control, global domination is its game.
1 Like
No, it doesn’t. It simply integrates them.
Different nations, cultures and ethnicities don’t matter when they’re all subject to civilization. Civilization is organized power.
Civilization, whether capitalist, socialist or communist, provides the platform for power:
Muslim? Christian? Atheist? India? America? UK? Doesn’t matter. Get to work. Pay tax. Obey.
1 Like
You’re not very bright. And you get thumbs up for that nonsense?
Different nations are good for business. As stated a few comments beneath the essay, which you did not read:
That isn’t my idea. That is text quoted from a Wikipedia article. Please read more carefully.
I’m contending the global system is already here. People are already systematically exploited.
What I’m suggesting is the human species will likely squabble over power and resources until either extinction or replacement by technology. Certainly overlap will occur, administrators administering humans along with technology and even vice versa, that is already happening.
If the species is extinct obviously the species can’t rule.
You’re not adding anything new or interesting to this discussion.
These topics, and more, have already been covered in the essay:
Get off the internet and spend time with your wife.
1 Like
.
Not the remaining ones that still maintain self-determination or more autonomy than the globalist agenda would like them to have.
.
Globalism has severely contaminated the food chain with heavy metals, mycotoxins, micro and nano plastics, pesticides, and many other cell disruptors.. the fact that they are only adding more and more into the food chain is very alarming indeed, but evident that they do not care.
..nor do they care of the impact that the implementations are having on people’s health, income, mortality rates, human casualties, financial buoyancy, life and livelihoods, mental health, and personal safety.
Which are those?
That does not negate the fact major nations are manipulated into labor games which ultimately benefit the ownership class.
China claims America is growing and willing to invade. America claims China is growing and willing to invade. That spurs paranoia and results in clamorous labor on all sides generating revenue for and further fortifying the ownership class. The leaders aren’t laboring. They are benefiting.
Good point.
Civilization and its artificial products, not merely globalism, has contaminated the food chain. This affects even supposed autonomous nations as pollution spreads throughout the biosphere.
No, they do not care. That’s why it is imperative we each find someone who does, to make sense of all this.
What are you some kind of anarcho primitivist? You talk exactly like one.
What’s the solution here, abandon civilization altogether? That’s not going to happen anytime soon.
What are your solutions? Do you even have any? Or, are you just waving your hands in the air flailing them about side to side saying we’re all doomed where we’re all going to die?
I will admit to you that given the current trajectory of civilization, there’s a chance it will destroy itself, we seem to be getting closer to that eventuality. I would seek out solutions instead of sitting by in idleness.
I congratulate you on your attitude, Daniel. Yes, discussion. Yes, there are no magic solutions. Yes, the human realm is very complicated. But you suggest discussion rather than simply proposing radical solutions, as some do. Radical solutions lead to the same problems we have today, to their perpetuation. The idea of a kind of global village where the old concepts of nation, homeland, etc., are replaced by the idea of belonging to humanity has its charm. For me, the most important thing will be for the individual to safeguard their place in this new world. As long as the possibility of individual autonomy exists, all will not be lost. In fact, we must always think of possibilities, of new possibilities, never of limiting or pruning them, as dogmatists do.
Anarcho-primitivists do a very valid criticism on the superficialities of human society. Even if their theories end up being a bit naive, they talk about problems most can’t simply ignore, like destruction of the environment, social alienation and exploitation of earth resources to the point of exhaustion.
1 Like