This is a psychological phenomenon that ought to be studied.
It has gone beyond personality worship and admiration and has some very distinct patterns.
It is pervasive among males of a certain age born and raised in specific cultures, and has minimal if any effect beyond it.
It is mind dominating, completely usurping every thought and word used to express it.
It is self-affirming. It requires its own mention to validate itself.
I have also enjoyed Nietzsche insights but was never so obsessed with him - or anyone for that matter.
Addictive personalities must be a component - obsessiveness.
Nietzsche was influenced by Schopenhauer and Wagner, and broke from both, as he grew older. This post-modern psychosis seems to linger well into middle-age.
Nietzsche was influenced by Indo-European philosophy and spirituality, predominately Hinduism and Hellenism, and we can see the influences in his use of language, his themes and the allegories he uses, but these traditions have components that go against modern ideological sensitivities, such as castes and slaves and attitudes towards women. This is covered by aphoristic triteness and literati cultural allusions, given that he was a professor of literature.
For me, Nietzsche’s greatest insights were on human psychology in a modern era of multi-cultural, urban, multiracial environments. I think this, as well as his antithesis to Schopenhauer’s melancholic pessimism, is the key to this psychological phenomenon.
One can almost hear Wagner’s heroic overtures as one reads Will to Power, evoking emotions that have been suppressed and muted by the necessities of modern living.
One can almost see young teenage boys of the past generation - not so much in this one - coming across Nietzsche’s philosophical prose, speaking of power and of human thinking, being completely awe-struck by the impact of his personality spilling out of his words, and with his the personalities of Wagner and Schopenhauer.
The poetics, returning us back to Hellenic methods of philosophizing in the agora, where ones words were evaluated not only for content but for style, returns us to past cultures that are romanticized by their exotic essence - so strange to a young man in these mundane times.
The method is Laconic, allowing the mind to find meaning in what is not said, just as much as he can find it in what is said. In fact, I think this is why he can be used by any dogma - did not the Nazis do so?
Allegories permit interpretations to run free, and Nietzsche was full of them.
His best work is poetic…just meditate over the phrase Will to Power and see where your emotions take you.
Schopenhauer’s Will to Life - from which he took his inspiration, is, by contrast, less masculine, more obvious. The word ‘power’ is the trigger.
And though it can be replaced by ‘energy’, it can also be replaced by the Hellenic ‘Eros’ a word used by the Greeks - replacing Ananke - to refer to existence. Just this change, alone, indicates a decadence that whispers a coming end. It may even be replaced by pathos, another exotic word, full of erotic innuendoes, that would trigger libidinal energies in teenage minds.
There are many factors…these are just some i could come up in a few minutes.
It’s a fascinating phenomenon.
I imagine such idol worshipping is part of pop-culture, and how many girls, young females, become obsessed with movie-stars and music stars or celebrities in general.
This is the feminine version of the above.
Although intelligence is also a part of it - simpler minds obsessing over more primal icons; more cerebral individuals, of both sexes, obsessing over intellectual icons.
I suspect that in the past this psychology must have been at work in the emergence of cults and religions - gifted rhetoricians preaching in the city-squares must have created quire a stir among the youth - was not Socrates condemned to death because of this? He too must have had quire an impact on the young men in Athens.
Youths gathering to hear the master speak…following him around, hanging from his every word, analysing it in groups, debating their deeper significance.
Was not Jesus - if he did in fact exist - such a figure?