I’m curious too.
Answer the question, piggy.
Why should I, Satyr, You, anybody else, pay the costs of Mary’s abortion? Why can’t you just answer the question? Are you scared of the answer, what it will reveal about you?
It’s a simple question. Are you that much of a coward?
Look, you can try to emulate Mr. Fun’s inane posts, but you will never even come close to emulating your own inane posts.
Oh, and please note where I ever made any mention at all of who pays for anyone’s abortion.
Besides, as with most things, it depends on the context.
On the other hand, as you constantly remind us, every single context there ever was can only truly be understood in a BitChute video.
Right?
Finally, and just out of curiosity, did your mother abort you?
Why should anybody pay the costs of Mary’s abortion?
Answer it
Ever and always: when faced with the task of coming back with something at least in the general vicinity of the “clever riposte”, it’s just not in you.
You are utterly witless!!!
This is literally all that you can think up!!
What is far more fascinating to me is why you allow me over and over and over again to make a fool out of you. It really doesn’t sink in that you are being made a fool of.
And even I find that sad at times.
Why should anybody pay the costs of Mary’s abortion?
Answer it
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BBgQFrcB8zw[/youtube]
When philosophy has been infested by nihilistic motives its use of words is to produce nonsense - language detached from the sensible world.
The motive is to impress, to insinuate…to use obscurantism as a magician uses sleight of hand, to conceal not to reveal, the vacuousness underlying the word-salads.
No anchoring in a tangible, observable, physical, natural reference…connecting to emotion, vanity, abstractions referring to more abstractions…impressing, creating an impression.
Manipulating and exploiting human anxieties, human vanities. Human needs and desires.
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ObhNiJaoVow[/youtube]
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jS9ku07gFbA[/youtube]
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2KdpPoRkJMw[/youtube]
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G6ZhnMA6Cls[/youtube]
What infests fArt infests philosophy…using the art of language.
Use of language to create the impression of profundity…triggering deep seated anxieties to come forth and be projected into the fArt form as if it were intentional.
I give you the end of Art in fArt…the end of music in cRap…the end of philosophy in obscurantism…mysticism…
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1t9xHws-Ak[/youtube]
Nihilism uses semiotics to invert the subjective/objective relationship, gradually negating the object/objective.
Parasite’s method of exploiting a host.
From gene to memes.
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aA-POO8S01Y[/youtube]
How a parasite can make an organism suicidal - detaching it from its environment.
Zombie parasites.
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vijGdWn5-h8[/youtube]
There exists a meme-based parasite…spreading from mind to mind, semiotically, linguistically - taking root and taking over.
Making the host suicidal…self-destructive - gradually disconnecting it from reality = zombification.
Host wants to be attacked and consumed…to infect a new host.
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C2Jw5ib-s_I[/youtube]
Zombifying dogmas/ideologies…using nihilism to hijack a host’s will.
Now think of a host that has entered into a symbiotic relationship - a covenant - with a zombifying memetic parasite.
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ySwuQhruBo[/youtube]
Making it part of its life-cycle.
Imagine a linguistically transmissible zombifying parasitical dogma/ideology…don’t imagine.
Look around you. It is real. It is over 2000 years old.
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_MxDcY_osw[/youtube]
Next paraphilia to be normalized?
Paedophilia - it has already begun through TV and media and Hollywood…and if the empire survives, maybe next bestiality, or necrophilia.
I doubt degeneracy will mange to fall that low before the entire edifice collapses.
Think about it…
Human beings are an inherent part of nature. So, how can anything that men and women do [sexually or otherwise] not be natural?
Instead, Lyssa will tell you that there are only human sexual behaviors that are truly natural.
So, how does she accomplish this?
Well, she turns nature into a kind of God. Nature allows you to choose what Lyssa insists are degenerate behaviors, but then Lyssa passes judgment on those behaviors that she has come to find abominable.
On the other hand, her Nature/God is not able to send you to Hell for the sin of choosing degenerate behaviors…so what she needs to insist instead is that civilization itself is on the line if the degenerates prevail.
This is her font of choice. This is what allows her to anchor her own precious Self to the comforting and consoling belief that even though there might be many conflicting moral narratives and political agendas regarding human sexuality, only her own is the One True Path. The fulminating fanatic objectivist mentality.
Which, of course, is exactly what all the others on their own fulminating fanatic paths are saying.
This way they can avoid altogether the arguments that I make in my signature threads here and simply declare themselves the winner.
One of us [in our clique/claque] vs. one of them [in their clique/claque].
After all, has that been or not been the same since our species left the caves? Just different fonts. Different authoritarian dogmas.
Nihilists deny the past so as to become two-dimensional the Last Men, i.e., individuals with no past, but only a present and a future.
Future is always associated with what is better - a movement towards the better, upward, progress.
the future is where their Utopia resides - “always a day away”.
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5PzL8aL6jtI[/youtube]
Paradise was projected “outside space/time” in an imagined “beyond” which was an allegorical way of saying “inside the mind”.
Postmoderns project their Utopia - their secular Paradise - in the forever future, the always a day away tomorrow - progress.
In Defense of Humorous Nihilism
John Marmysz looks on the funny side of absolute nothingness.
Of course, the most common “solution” of all is to embrace one or another God/No God font and insist that if others refuse to embrace it as well then they and they alone are responsible for any and all incongruities in their lives.
After all, look at how many threads have been started right here at ILP in which one or another objectivist [more or less fulminating fanatically] attempted to propose their own resolution. And they succeeded or failed [in my view] depending on how important it is that success and failure were even possible. While my argument is that in a No God world, I am unable to think up how one could be successful. At least in regard to “I” in the is/ought world.
“Superlative ideals” as encompassed in opaque intellectual contraptions like this:
The real world is ever at the beck and call of whatever mental masturbaters of this ilk conclude that reality is. It’s all encompassed in a “think tank” progress…given their own subjective account of the past, the present and the future. Don’t ask him for details because he can’t – won’t – tell you. And her own dogmatic Utopian idealities, while paying lip service intellectually to the world around us, almost never actually include human interactions in the cloud formations she posts here.
And preposterous as it is this discomfort only pertains to the intellectual contraptions themselves. Imagine then their discomfort when confronting the cognitive incongruities embedded in actual sets of circumstances revolving around actual conflicting goods.
Physics must be cleansed of over two-thousand years of superstition, and an underlying nihilistic infection - connected with Abrahamism.
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b8npmtsfsTU[/youtube]
My model:
Physis - middle, starting point. Sensually perceived.
Metaphysis - foundational, derived from the previous. Theoretical, spiritual.
Ideology - alignment of the previous two in relation to an objective.
We’ll need a context of course.
A doggone real one this time. =D>
We see here how a theoretical model’s mathematical “beauty”…can seduce the human brain…
Just as linguistic beauty can pretend to be saying something when it is nonsense, but is convincing because it is so theoretically ordered, beautiful…symmetrical.
No chaos in there, at all.
All is ordered, all is knowable.
This is what feeds into human anxieties.
Exactly. The moral and political “beauty” embedded in convincing yourself that how you understand nature given your own assumptions about genes and memes intertwined in value judgments revolving around things like race, gender and sexuality. All is ordered, all is knowable in accordance with your own assumptions.
Theoretically in particular.
as far as I can tell lorkeet? or whatever name they have,
seems only to be able to post video’s…so as far as
I know, he/she/it isn’t smart enough to use actual words
to explain their position…hence the dependence on video’s…
I think that explain the use of video’s… people who depend
on video’s just aren’t smart to use words to explain their
position… it is a crutch to hide the fact they are pretty
stupid and unable to use words to explain their beliefs…
it helps explain UR and Observe dependence on video’s…
video’s help the stupid explain stuff they otherwise couldn’t explain…
Kropotkin
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpgor5hdD8s[/youtube]
In the Big Bang Model we see nihilism at work.
A singularity is presumed to exist “before”…
The Yin/Yang model seems to be more sophisticated.
A near-absoltue point that never finalized, never became an absolute point…which would have negated existence.
Order containing chaos; chaos containing order.
Man had already a conception of this…and in the west we lost it when we were contaminated by an Afro-asiatic spirituality.
Space = possibility = order/chaos interacting, projected as expanding possibilities.
Matter/Energy ([size=85]ordered, patterned[/size]) = probability - restriction of possibilities.
Jaynes explains how spiritual experiences were a product of the Bicameral Mind - emerging self-awarness and conscience…with its own inner-voice.
I take it a step further, and explain how this nascent self-consciousness exposing the individual’s ego to a new source of stress and insecurity, necessitating a defensive reaction which developed into a spirituality and then political ideologies that were attractive to the majority.
Two excellent videos…
I have yet to fully listen to the first video… the second video is reflective of my conflicting thoughts on the matter… the last guy, especially being the most interesting… his notion that a photon-filled Universe would create a timeless state is of most interest to my mind. He’s the kind of Professor, you could listen to all day and never get bored of his class. 
The oldest/ancientest religions speak of previous Eons… a cycle of universal rebirths after each death, of the whole… a reincarnation of the entirety, but that still does not explain how all came to be, but it does offer a focal point of imagining further perspective on the how.