“In Sweden at first I was appalled by all the rapes of us Swedish women especially as a feminist but later I discovered that these rapes are justified in that it makes up for the white guilt of us Swedes where possibly it might be morally justified on the part of Muslim men. Now I’ve converted to Islam and wear a Hijab everyday. Everyday is a real struggle reconciling my western feminist beliefs with Islam but slowly I am being able to. Down with the sexist white Christian Swedish patriarchy! Allah Akbar!”
The similarities between national socialism and Marxism needing an external enemy to unite a social movement is uncanny. For national socialists it was Jews and for Marxists it is ‘evil’ white people. In 1930’s Germany it was Jewish privilege that was the scourge of the world and throughout western civilization in the year 2016 it is now presently white [ethnic European] privilege.
In 1930’s Germany it was the onslaught of a super Jewish conspiracy over the world internationally and presently in the year 2016 under Marxist rule it is the plot of ‘evil’ white people conspiring over the world domestically or internationally. History repeats and rhymes.
It’s racist that there is too many Chinese in China. I demand China take in all the refugees of Syria and Iraq. Fucking racist Chinese and their Chinese ethnocentric privilege.
The ethnocentric racism of the Chinese allows them to still be a majority within their own nation. That is clearly a hate crime and I feel triggered where I need to crawl to the nearest safe space.
The very existence of ethnocentric Chinese is a micro aggression front against the entire planet.
As people noticed earlier in this thread I discussed the origins of multiculturalism being embedded within religious thoughts and ideals. That’s because the entire concept of a one world racial or cultural utopia extends directly from Abrahamic religions. This includes Christianity, Judaism, and Islam.
The entire absurdity of racial and cultural one world interconnected utopia (multiculturalism) is a religious motif. Multiculturalism is a direct result of monotheism just as globalism in terms of politics and government is(global government/ political-monism).
Similar groups can co-exist together, but for states to think that more dissimilar groups can is foolish and obviously proving dangerous… what with the latest spate of terror attacks.
When it comes to vastly different religions and beliefs, the state needs to be even more cautious about immigration… when the UK signed up to that last EU regulations reformation a few years back, we also signed our soul away along with our borders and decision-making.
Different groups of people can coexist on the planet but the need for individual territory and living space will always be present. Competition for such cultural and racial enclaves also. There is however no coexisting when you pick and choose which groups of people can thrive and which ones that cannot. That will lead to disaster and crisis as time moves forward.
I do feel that for western civilization any kind of resurgence or resurrection at this point is too late especially looking at western fertility rates. A race or culture that does not breed and reproduce is effectively a dead one.
Me too. It should be noted that I consider myself a neutral observer. I am neither for or against multiculturalism just as I am also neither for or against ethnic nationalism also. I am not mentally invested in either existential ideology but I do like discussing the existential crisis of both points. Both subjects taken to the extreme lead to equal catastrophe.
