Nothing is perfect

The answer, as you, yourself, well know, is mutual catering/submission. That looks different in different contexts, not all of which are sexual, you freaking weirdo who refuses to act like a normal person!

[To self: You are my spirit animal.]

Decipher this… I’m sorry, I thought I had already posted it somewhere. I have made a million or so notes and it’s hard to keep track:

How we ought to play (how ought do) is for a fun end/value (why value end) is by rules that are existentially important (what is be). That’s why love is not love without demonstration.

[PERFECT MERCY] [HARMONY/alignment] is when how ought do AND what is be AND why value end all pivot self=other. If self does not equal (is not treated as) other, they (ought/is/value) will be knocked out of alignment within the individual and without (within the culture).

There is never complete lack of alignment (nihil) because if there was, we would decompose into nobody, and nobody is not a person who can see or not see the difference between alignment and lack of it. A complete lack of alignment is a complete absence of being, and our existence is proof that a complete absence of being has never been—otherwise, we could never have been.

The following quotes are yours from above:
6E279A7D-15AF-445B-AF37-8B8268A4011D.jpeg
0BA4B9C6-2F0A-48B7-B541-7435D8844F00.jpeg