Incorrect doesn’t mean meaningless, genius.
read the 3 paradoxes dean shows Godel end in -you will see the meaninglessness
You’ve still said nothing at all. I don’t personally have any experts, nor am I familiar with yours. I don’t know what it means for them to be “thrown down my throat” even if I did have some.
I’ve asked you simply to state your thesis, idea, summary of your assertions, or what have you at least 5 times.
I think it’s safe to say that you have no idea what you’re talking about, or that I have no idea how to ask a proper question.
Thank you for explaining nothing, and proving that yuo know nothing about what you’re trying to talk about.
i know godel used AR
and i know experts say it is invalid
you want to know why it is invalid go ask those experts
when an expert says there is no place for AR in mathematics
sorta says godel blows it by useing such a discredited axiom
what you are really fishing for is an argument you can deconstruct to show dean ends in contradiction
seeing you want to show of your logic skills i will give you something to play your mind with
ENJOY
you want to know why godel ends in meaninglessness go read dean work
here is paradox 3
dean is a fraud, a loser, and incorrect.
did you enjoy paradox 3
have fun trying to prove dean wrong did you
so lets here the analysis of paradox 3 and show us how dean is
^^ you’re not worth reading. I’m not going to waste my time; I’ve already wasted enough time determining that.
come on show us your logic skills
Sure:
Terrible grammar, when used in a ‘published’ work, is usually a sign of laziness and unintelligence on the part of the writer.
Therefore, colin is not worth reading what he, the writer, can’t even be bothered to correct.
colin’s ‘poems’ are terrible. Absolutely horrendous.
Therefore, his ‘poetry’ isn’t worth reading.
colin can’t understand the science he claims to refute.
Therefore, his writings on science aren’t worth reading.
you have terrible grammar.
colin leslie whatshisface has the same terrible grammar.
Therefore, you are him.
you have not even read his poems
prove it and gives us some horrendous lines
I read one poem that had the word ‘cunt’ used like 90 times. It was awful…downright awful. And believe me, I’m all for using the word cunt in the proper context. The poem was just horrendous. I can’t bring myself to read through them again to find it. I won’t have to, though; anyone who reads through your ‘poetry’ will know how terrible it is. I think I read like 20 other lines from other poems collectively…each one was worse than the next. your ‘poetry’ is trash.
speaking of that
r u female
No. ‘i r’ not female.
for a moment there i though you where a female in love with colin leslie dean
That almost makes sense.
yes you are obsessed with him like a love struck teenage girl
It’s not obsession if you can’t help but encounter the object every time you walk into a room.
The reason I’ve read any of your writings is because I have to. To decide whether something is worthwhile or not, you usually have to give it a chance. I gave you that courtesy.
I didn’t really need to give your ‘poetry’ that chance after seeing your sad attempt at language, but it also goes with the ‘know thy enemy’ mindset, which I’m all for.
so why is dean your enemy-what has he personaly done to you
your logic is offensive to those who actually understand things.
So are your forum manners.
My enemies are those that think they understand but they just don’t get it.
so show that by pointing out whats wrong with deans logic in paradox 3 then