Hey, I have an idea! Why don’t you create another fictitious profile and support ladyjane who supports colin? Then you’d really have us convinced!
are you in love with ladyjane then
No. Aside from ladyjane being a man, and that I’m engaged, I could never fall in love with someone of your intellectual capacity.
i think the problem is dean destroyes your assumptions -sends you into chaos - he threatens your cosy conventional reality and you just go into anxiety mode and attack what you see as dangerous
if we lived in the middle ages you would have been one of those burning dean at the stack for upsetting your world view for heresy
Pfft. Get real. You want to see someone who actually challenged my assumptions? Go look for my discussions with Muscular Philosopher. I didn’t break down and attack him, because he had something intelligent and interesting to say even though it defied what I ‘knew’.
you haven’t said anything intellectually challenging.
I take that back. Deciphering your meaning from your horrible grammar is sometimes an intellectual challenge.
you are not someone who would be burned for heresy. your ‘science’ isn’t worth the fuss. you would be the village idiot, not the heretic.
how can u say that when you want even read paradox 3 by dean
I read it a long time ago. I just refuse to respond to it.
Anyways, it’s been fun, village idiot, but I got the email I was waiting for so I’m heading to bed.
I admire your tact in handling this thread/LJ/CL Dean, Anthem!
Poetry with vulgar words, hhmmm - how common and vile, and crude, and…
I still just want someone to explain to me what Godel was talking about and how dean refutes it with some degree of clarity.
cant you see
it does not matter what godel was talking about
it does not matter what his theorem is
all that matters is what ever he did was done with invalid axioms
it does not matter what others have proven since
as what godel proved was will invalid axioms
cont you get it
if you use invalid premisses-which are assumed to be valid- in a proof your proof is invalid
ie i am you accountant i use invalid premess to prove your money is mine you could not care less about the proof all you need to know is i proved your money is mine with invalid axioms
Thanks for nothing.
i noticed you did not comment on paradox 3
you wanted something
i gave it to you
and what do i get’
nothing
lets see your high IQ in action
You’re ignoring my questions, and answering them with uninformed horseshit.
Make yourself clear, or admit you’re wrong.
cant get that great mind around paradox 3
i see
if you had the brains it would not be hard to seee that invalid premesis makes a proof invalid
gee cant see much hope for you at law school
gee
all some one has to do is present an invalid law and proove your client guilty -shit i dont think you will have much of a carreer at all
Sure pal, whatever you say.
come on
i gave you a law example to show why invalid premessis cant prove anything
seems like
you are snookered
if you think my example is invalid then tell us why
I wont humor you. So you know, if you’re trying to convince someone of a radical idea, you have to be able to explain it. Not just by repeating that something is invalid, but by showing it to be. That’s the problem, you can’t distinguish fact from opinion, and you don’t understand the philosophical implications of Godel’s work. Have fun attempting to be some half witted antagonist, but we both know that you’re either a troll who just loves to mess with people, or you’re a lonely weirdo who isn’t as smart as he thinks.
she is a girl for starters. she is not a native english speaker (which takes away from here message). and she does not care about philosophy, ONLY opinions.
she calls you snookered for not proving that a conclusion is invalid with an invalid premise.
though it is not proven invalid given the untrue premise. without said premise the conclusion is an unsupported assumption. most of the assumptions out of ladyjane are antagonistic… she just wants to cause a ruccuss.
i have told you what the experts says and told you to take it up with them
your doctor says you have VD do you question the expert
your accountant says you get more money back from tax-do you question the experts
so tell us why you dont accept mathematics experts