On Human Nature
The human condition is but was of desire due to an in born hole that narratives are built upon so to contain. These narrative are less about values of truth or falsity but rather constructed and applied patterns so to build a symbolic fortress call “perspective”.
These perspectives are effectively repeated concepts, the concepts have no ground but the desire for them. This desire in itself is irrational, the perspectives that contain the desires do not fully eliminate desire but rather redirects it.
The result is competing states of insanity, the nature of contradiction and opposition often viewed as a wrong state is but the state that allows these states of insanity to be clarified as values.
The vast majority of people do not want truth, nor can agree on what it is nor consistitutes if even if they seek it. Rather they want a secure narrative…and when they get it after time progresses they find the narrative oppressive… and the process loops as the formation of new perspectives that appear to change structure but effectively are the same loop of conceptualization as the previous asserted, but eventually deemed faulty, original ones.
The question of truth and falsity is less a desire for truth and falsity and more of a desire for a pattern to contain the irrational within the human experience.
The words “truth” and “lie” are, at the primitive level, assertions that gain traction within groups and individuals less out of value and more upon the level at which they resonate.
This resonation is pattern alignment between what is asserted and the means by which people use to contain the “hole” while failing to realize that the act of attention itself is contained and directed by the very same assertions they seek as boundary conditions.
Human nature desires peace and security while requiring the very same conflict it condemns so to make that peace and security meaningful and distinctly identifiable.
The paradox goes deeper as peace and security are effectively concepts that are wheels within a multi-generational systematic machine and any notion beyond the fact that they are repeated distinctions by which to align reality is subdued in accords to the irredicuble fact that not only does noone agree on what these wheels do but noone knows how are why they are what they or nor the actual state of being that appears when these wheels are used.
What repeats is the desire for peace and security, as the central spoke hole, for what these wheels spin on.
Some claim reason and then place faith in assumptions that this reason is built upon without acknowledging the contradiction of it.
Some claim faith and then build reasoning to scaffold such faith when it contradicts the elements of reality that weather such faith.
What remains, regardless of faith or reason, is contradiction and this contradiction is the fundamental act of desire itself for by said desires do people idolize concepts and beliefs unto a state of godhood thus resulting in a symbolic clash of God’s by which meaning is derived.
This meaning, sought after by many, is but an attempt to contain the hole within, while those of nihilistic ambitions assume the hole as the only truth.
But a deeper contradiction remains as the nihilistic and those who seek meaning both require the very same opposition they argue against so to have a sense of identity.
This hole is less of a metaphysical or physical construct but rather the paradoxical nature of attention itself as the void within it reveals a reality that cannot be purely regulated but rather directed. To direct it many resort to handing such attention over to others so to avoid any autonomy that requires personal accountability while a sub section knows the cost of this autonomy and fear the transformative nature it contains.
The human condition is less of a thing and more of a narrative to contain the unknown with a fixed category as the continual progressive question of what this nature is or is not reveals only more branching questions as each answer is reveal.
By this degree truth and falsity become secondary only the the patterns asserted as what remains is less a notion of what it means to be human and rather the emergence and dissolution of limits that cannot be fully understood within a simple all encompassing context.
Yet context remains and this context is the cyclicality of it all, a security for some…until enough time passes and security becomes shackles, and a shack for other until enough time passes and the shackles become a comfortable identity.
