I think natural laws are unchangeable. They may just appear to change just because previously we might had faulty understanding of them and now we may acquire better understanding of them.
Yes I do agree if we only talk of this particular universe, we could follow with its law, but I do think that there is a supernatural law that overides and this natural law compensate to it in this universe.
Yes. Limitations of our understanding system doesn’t let us fully understand the actual and real law of nature. We can only move towards better and better understanding of them.
Agreed.
I don’t think like this. Rather than calling it “human concept”, I would like to call it “German concept”. Idea that time has no objective existence has foundation in German Philosophy. This is a point of view, not a fact which should be acceptable to all.
Haha, cool. Well I personally don’t like Kantian philosophy, but I must clarify when I mean does not exist in this context is it does not exist in the physical world; it is an abstract idea, like numbers.
Must time be acceptable to all? I don’t believe so, that is a Newtonian assumption and you see time is very relative unlike mass, or weight, or gravity.
For many cases, it is right. Like I exclude this possibility that when I will drop a ball from hand in quite ordinary situation, it can go upside rather than going downside. I very confidently can exclude this possibility. More strictly, I can treat nature to be quite fixed. So nothing that actually happens can be supernatural. It can seem to us supernatural just because of our own faulty understanding of law of nature. When we shall rightly understand the underlying law of nature, then we will not find any supernatural aspect in real happenings.
You do really hate German concept of causation, haha. All the same natural law is right if it is in its own universe, but if another reality overlaps it, well there we have the problem. Now if we are closed minded to something, however real, well there lays again the problem. Can you really understand something you do not want to accept?
Right. Science itself limits itself to only empirically verifiable things. So it loses its supremacy as well.
Agreed.
right
Wait what is your stance about this, I assume this is a sarcasm.