I concur on the matter of sex and computer ganes. I follow no sports except I quite like F1, but I agree that supporting a team is meaningless to me. I extend that rejection of tribalism to nations and all reilgions too.
I’ve tried most drugs except heroin. Never been addicted to anything except tobacco which nearly killed me.
Do not buy lotterly tickets ever - because of maths.
But I do find pleasure in life and am loved, have been loved, and do love.
Well, I envy you very much. I only have to emotionalize my feelings, but my mind is always higher. However, this does not mean that there are no primitive reactions to pain, cold, burns, for example. But at the same time, I can easily talk them out of it. Which has its problems. For example, teeth don’t hurt, but they’re decaying. Blood stops, but without antiseptic, you can get an infection. Eliminating pain is not a cure. But treating people, I’m forbidden by statute. I mean, I do it, but it’s for people close to me. It’s too high a price to pay. It’s not commensurate with the desire to help. I’ve come to terms with the law - if you don’t ask, don’t get involved.
Interesting. Sculptor? Sculpting people? Is that how I understand you?
Wow. You’re filled with contradictions. Women never do porn for free. They don’t even flash their tits for free. They actually have a denial trigger when men do anything sexual for free. It hurts women to see man give nudity for free. Women have a mafia to this regard. I understand why they do this. They are the weaker sex and they need money to do it. That’s their only strategy in this world.
I’m not a puritan by any stretch of the imagination. I just know how the world works.
I’ll add to my last post, and I really want people to know this about porn.
I live in Portland Oregon. We have the largest naked bike ride on earth a few times a year. It’s a movement to get people off cars.
You know who shows up to watch it?
Straight men. Gay men and lesbians. Straight women don’t care about it.
Straight women are oversexed, and they don’t care about it.
We have ten thousand people do that ride
Population control is objective. If human’s weren’t overpopulated, why then is it illegal to hunt animals without a license? Because animals would go extinct, that’s why. It’s not a matter of opinion.
You can be an Alex Jones and complain about population control all you want, but one day something changed me.
That day, I walked onto the beach and the entire beach was covered with cigarettes. I then knew the human race was overpopulated and ruinous.
On another day, on another beach, the entire beach was covered in oil.
I am literally a sculptor. Not just people, but other things.
THough this is just something I do, and I cannot be “understood” through this knoweldge.
Sculptors are people, and are unique, as are all people. I’ve done other things too. But I’ve never been characterised by my profession.
The next time you order a Starbucks, you might be talking to a PhD student of Philosophy. The next person asking you if you “want fries with?” that might be a carer, painter, dog lover, psychopath ad infinitem
But this is why all opinion is subjective.
You would probably do well to reject your odd ideas about the object/subject dichotomy. It’s not the first time you have made this mistake.
You can still express all the ideas you want and never have to mention these words again.
There are several opinions about “population” in the USA. 1) We are being swamped by brown and black people who breed more; 2) All society would be better if there were fewer people; 3) We need more children being born since a top heavy age-pyramid is bad for the economy; 4) We need to expel immigrants 5) The US economy only works when there is a high immigrant population.
Which is the objective one please?
What is your point ?
An equally valid conclusion is that women are asexual or sex-negative: repulsed by the human form.
In fact if a man is oversexed, has harems, he cannot get enough of women, he will scroll through hundreds of porns all day. I think women’s aversion to human sexuality may explain it better than the oversexed theory, but I’m not sure.
Some of the things you listed are subjective, others are objective.
Because that some things are subjective, doesn’t mean objectivism is a myth or irrelevant.
Objectivism as a political or philsophical movement is morally bankrupt.
Discuss
This really disqualifies you for discussion.
Exactly!
This is humorous because you believe in moral relativism, which is morally bankrupt, and you believe in it because of subjectivism.
Go a head and make you case.
You’re missing the irony. “Sculptor” is a creator. By analogy, you can “sculpt” people - create (change) their psyche. At least that’s what Demon does.
“Man sees only what he understands.”
The demon clarifies.
Unfortunately, man sees even less because he refuses to understand.
No irony missing.
You are just wrong.
I was once a teacher - then I was able to sculpt minds.
You are a Grandpa!
So how did that happen?
Unless you have Borderline Personality Disorder.
My point is that women have sown their wild oats way more than men have.
They’ve tried all the penis sizes; they’ve seen lots of dicks. They don’t even have to try.
They are supersaturated by penises.
The only way a man cannot get upset by this is if that man doesn’t care whether
the species survives.
Otherwise, the man will be upset.
Women choose about 1% of the male population for ALL the sex before women settle down.
Those men are the happiest men on earth.
The other 99% of men are just looking for scraps.