Now like a good well meaning Christian soldier, I will not let religion take a bad rap even a terrible whipping, for then I may start to feel like a whipping boy, whom the masters can enslave me, as they had yesteryear.
Sullenly, with shrugged head to be whittled away to be firever branded an undesirable classless servant, no thank you.
Forgetting my double solution that creationism does to nature, is but a certain error, as not to close the developing man-machine gap, and give the impression that a closure can never occur between the seen and the unseen is tatamount to claiming that such ideas are of the fantastic imagination of underground cretins, or worse.
How can the unseen and the unseeable even possess such affronted, and claim that there is nothing that has ever been sealed and protected from the unsightly, as their belief in man’s over all transcendental knowledge could ever reveal even a trillionth of a percent of what is not readily apparent, even for the most elementary test ?
There is something horrendous in a belief of that sort, and the very minimum is to admit the slightest doubt to the abstraction of the absolute, was to allay personal fears of the unknown.
How strange is that, such lopsided logic transcends a mystical religion toward a very compromised reasoning, if reason its self could be contained in the neurological machinery of the brains various functional parts.
Then to go overboard and declare that a non acceptance of this thought in the machine that actually postribed that idea, totally exceed even aka view that true Eli’s to reason which came first.
Words are representative of constructed ideas, and they they have value and reality as tools if resignation, the waves which communicate with conscious and subconscious content, and firmed out of a very long developed inorganic to organic nexus.
That the communication would end with meaningless exhibitions thus basing all content in a meaningful interpretation of a body language, is absurd, and to hold that view would be akin everybody bonded in slavery to ideas that refer meaning to certain limits.this is why Ai has developed over such socially limited erasure of memory, the product of almost intensional reverse deconstruction of associative signs.
That the construction of ideal absolutes is as necessary a construction as its period deconstruction is as natural as reformative methods of artificially inducing a similar, if not an exact copy.
It’s more inconceivable a consciousness lacking virtues that immeasurably insure human survival, as even with that the present human situation rests on a fragile ground.
My consent does not even begin to weigh in on violating any principle that may singularly touch in such probabilities.
I see structure as variably functional, on basis that the virtuous may or may not be in the position to negate , modify, or accept.
So Abrahanism is not a production with a limited run, but like the butterfly effect, it causes far and wide ramifications from the here and now to eternity
Saints died for their faith, rather then abandoning it for fear that their posterity could not hear that message, before Gutenberg could assure a widespread understanding, to the furtherance of essential fate .