Paranormal Activity Review

(There will be some spoilers in this Review, I will attempt not to be too specific except for the beginning)

Paranormal Activity mania is sweeping the nation, as almost everyone knows. This independent film written and directed by Oren Peli was reportedly produced for around $15,000 and has made over 62 million dollars at the box office so far. This film, which gained wide release by Paramount via an on-line, “Demand,” site where 1,000,000 demands were required for Paramount to release the film starring Katie Featherston and Micah Sloat. Word-of-Mouth has also had tremendous impact on the box office take for this film, which leaves only one question:

Does it live up to the hype?

Paranormal Activity begins with Micah (Micah Sloat), a day trader, showing his girlfriend Katie (Katie Featherston) a camera that he had bought earlier that day for, “About half of what I made today.” It soon becomes known to the viewer that Micah purchased this camera in order to capture recurring paranormal events going on inside of their shared home. Initially, the viewer will get the impression that these paranormal events are mostly bump-in-the-night nuisance hauntings, but that turns out not to be the case.

After a few nights with some activity, Katie finally convinces Micah to allow (She’s a full-time graduate student, so presumably it’s his money) a psychic to come in and discuss this activity with them. It turns out that these incidents have been plaguing Katie since around the age of 8. After fully describing the occurences, the psychic declares that the activity is the work of demons and states that demons are not his field of expertise. He does refer the couple to a demonologist prior to making his exit.

During his visit, the psychic informed the couple that demons become stronger with negativity. Only a couple of minutes later into the movie, Katie and Micah have their first disagreement with each other in which it is clear that they are not joking around. As the paranormal activity throughout this movie becomes more violent, so does their relationship become more negative and troubled.

Micah and Katie work together pretty well with dry banter that seems natural and unscripted. There are regular moments throughout the movie that will give viewers an occasional chuckle. This is definitely one of the highlights of the movie as it keeps the characters realistic, if not always believable.

Micah is not necessarily a credible character throughout the movie because he is very wishy-washy throughout the whole series of events in his attitude. At times, Micah will appear to be even more terrified than Katie and then, seconds later, will taunt the unknown force or forces with statements such as, “Is that all you got?” This bravado is demonstrated by Micah throughout the movie, particularly when the situation to the viewer is clearly out of his control, he still refuses to call the demonologist as he wants to deal with the situation himself.

Generally all that is expected from a female lead in a horror movie is that she be able to scream fairly well and act scared. This movie is no exception, not a whole lot was required from Katie Featherston and that is a standard she lived up to pretty well. Some credit should be given her for her natural delivery of dialogue and banter with co-star, Micah, but aside from that she didn’t really need to do anything impressive.

Ultimately, Peli chose to focus on the building-up aspect of horror films as there are only four or five major events (depending on what a person would consider major) that occur during the movie, and the couple is not even present during one of those events, though they see documentation of the event later. The first half of the movie, if not the first three-quarters of the movie mainly focus on the gradual increase in both the frequency and the substance of the activity that occurs which is meant to put the viewer on edge for what will happen to the couple later.

After the build-up is where the question of whether or not this is a great horror movie is answered, and that answer so far has been pretty close to down the middle. This gradual build-up is utilized by Peli in order to get the viewers attention and leave the viewer waiting for something major to happen. The reason this approach works on many people is because the mere psychological expectation of something major happening makes the actual occurrence seem all the more frightening. The viewers are literally left waiting, constantly, for something serious to happen, for the shit to hit the fan, so to speak and as the events in the movie are building-up to these events, so is the viewer psychologically building himself up in anticipation of the events.

One thing must be known for certain, the actual events and scenes in this movie, when taken by themselves, are almost not at all frightening. Peli’s idea behind creating this psychological build-up works for many viewers who have themselves built-up to the point that if someone taps them on the shoulder they may well have a heart attack. This constant psychological anticipation leaves the viewer in a position where something that would normally be merely mildly disturbing is immensely horrifying.

The fact of the matter is this cannot be expected to work on all viewers, and it doesn’t. For many viewers, this psychological anticipation will very rapidly give way to extreme boredom. Rather than eagerly anticipate when the major horrifying events will happen, the viewer becomes disinterested and apathetic instead. By the time the major events actually take place, (well into the movie) the level of anticipation for this sort of viewer has dropped to almost nothing and only one of these four-five major events will even give the viewer a minor startle. On a personal note, even that event didn’t do it for me.

Given Peli’s limited budget, the special effects border impressive. According to Micah Sloat:

“Every single thing you see in the movie with the exception of one shot is completely filmed on camera.” (1)

Unfortunately, that is given Peli’s limited budget for the movie. In reality, the special effects might have been impressive for a movie made in the 1980’s, but when one watches carefully enough, it is not difficult to determine the various ways that these special effects could have come to be. One positive about the special effects is Peli makes fantastic use of light and creates some really subtle effects with shadows.

Ultimately, whether or not a viewer will like this movie depends on two things:

1.) Can the viewer obtain a psychological high, and maintain that psychological high for the better part of an hour?

2.) Is the viewer fairly susceptible to horror films and horror effects, in general?

If the answer to one and not the other is yes, the film will probably be OK. If the answer to both questions is yes, the viewer will probably be scared out of his/her wits because Peli honestly does a tremndous job with building suspense. If the answer to both questions is no, then prepare to be disappointed as this movie will not live up to its hype at all.

Unfortunately, I am of the lattermost category of people, and I imagine all others who found this film dreadful are. I would take that into consideration if I were a complete rock when it comes to horror films, but I have been frightened (to an extent) by horror films before. The most recent example is 2006’s, The Abandoned, which is a must-watch for all fans of this genre.

In summation, it is clear why many viewers (particularly those more susceptible to frightening elements) would find this film to be quite scary, but there will likely be an equal number of people who are completely unmoved by it. I cannot in good conscience give this movie a high score because I am of the latter of the two groups and I was immensely bored with the whole thing. The only saving graces of this movie are the banter between the two main characters, the fact that the acting was decent overall and the more subtle theatrical elements employed by Peli. Unfortunately, as an untrained viewer, I should not be bored enough on the first go-around to notice all of the subtle theatrical elements, and yet, I did.

2.5 out of 10

Man, I just saw this. Horror movies are usually a let-down for me so I’m very discriminate in choosing which ones I see. I chose to see this one because I had heard that nothing really happens in like the first third of the movie, and that things eventually build up and get intense at the end. I think it’s interesting when a movie can take you from “I’m boreeeed. What’s the point of this movie??” to “Holy fuck, I’m scared.” So I wanted to see if Paranormal Activity would have that affect; and it was pretty good. I wasn’t expecting much going into it, so maybe I appreciated it more. I’ve been scared far worse by other movies, but this one was pretty creepy - maybe more creepy because I watched it alone in the dark. Also, while you’re right about the stereotypical male/female roles, it didn’t bother me at all. What I like about Paranormal Activity is that the movie really feels like a home video. The actors stutter, mix up their words, and act like they’re not acting at all. That’s refreshing. Most of the big movies these days seem to be made for fun or just to show off - there’s no real focus on true-to-life acting. The stars of Hollywood are so big that we don’t ever stop seeing them even when they’re in character. When you watch a movie with Brad Pitt, it’s always there, at some level, no matter how into the movie you are, that you’re watching Brad Pitt. With Paranormal Activity, the actors are not at all well-known and they don’t have that Hollywood polish that makes so many movies today totally unlife-like. Like you said, the acting was very natural, and that was appreciated. But I’m playing up this fact because in a horror movie I think it’s important to have believable, real-life characters. Also, I appreciated Paranormal Activity because it was scary without so many gimmicks and cheap surprises or tacky monsters and special affects. There were some, yeah, but they were tolerable for me. You rated this movie a 2.5 out of 10. But Paranormal Activity gave me just what I wanted. It scared me. Even if I explain it away and even if I know that my being frightened was enhanced by suspense and anticipation, the fact remains that I was scared when I watched this movie.

7.5 out of 10

A counter-review, cool concept!

I have a few things that I would like to bring into question with relation to your review, and please feel free to do the same with mine.

I’m going to give you credit here for being able to separate yourself from your initial boredom with this film. After you’ve been bored for such a great period of time with something, though, I’m sure you understand how it might be difficult for some people not to be predisposed to boredom for the entirety of the film.

I was predisposed to boredom for the rest of the film, which is why when something major happened, I didn’t care. I honestly spent the last half of the film figuring out how they were making the special effects happen because it was the only way to prevent myself from falling asleep.

I definitely would have fallen asleep, then.

Agreed.

By necessity. It is refreshing to see an occasional movie feel as though it is, “Real,” but most movies just require a suspension of disbelief. I don’t know what kind of story you could put around my life, for instance, but it would be mostly boring. The point is, would you like every movie to be something in the neighborhood of me getting out of bed, scratching my nuts, getting a cup of coffee, bullshitting with my wife…etc.

Let’s face it, if you took the horror out of Paranormal Activity what you would have is just the story of a regular couple, and that would be pretty boring.

I agree that horror is the best genre for such a thing. I don’t know if you’ve ever seen, “Vacancy,” with Luke Wilson, but I found it to be a rancid piece of garbage. I could watch Idiocracy fifty consecutive times before I ever watch that movie once more. In fact, I can think of very few (if any) horror movies that I’ve liked that had a big name star in them. I guess The Sixth Sense was okay, a 6/10 at best, but that’s about it.

That’s where we differ, I agree with everything in the quote above except the word, “Scary.”

Like I said, with some people it will work and with some it won’t. Recognizing that, even if I had been scared out of my wits, I still couldn’t give the movie better than a 5/10.

Watched it two days ago in my living room while everyone else was asleep. Scared the absolute living shit out of me. It was actually more scary because the things happening on the screen were happening at exactly the same kinda time, in exactly the same kinda house, to mine. I used to feel relieved when the time counter on the camera used to speed up “oh good, I’m safe now.”

After the film had finished I had to a) go and check on the internet to see if it was real or not and b) sit up reading trashy novels till 4am to get to sleep.

9.9/10.