Peacocking and Virtue Signaling

Peacocking and Virtue Signaling are both grounded in the same root, in Nature, specifically in Mammalian heterosexual mating-rituals, where males (and sometimes females) exhibit to potential mates, or even those around them who are not mates, their sexual (and thereby their Societal) value. This generally means that an individual “chooses” to handicap him/herself, voluntarily, as a show and demonstration of one’s virility or fertility. Much of the flaunting is braggadocious: “Look everybody, at how much weight I can bench-press, aren’t I so great!? Aren’t I so strong!? Nobody can bench-press this much weight! Stand and be amazed by me! Other males bow to me; females flock to my side and mate with me!”

However, apply this ‘peacocking’ not only to mate-selection… but to everything else in life: society, class, lifestyle, health, diet, online media, consumed media, etc. A wealthy person then, flaunts and demonstrates all of these, by… attending the opera, driving or being driven by chauffeurs, in sports cars or other luxurious vehicles, private jets, etc. Even the small town, local drunkard, is loud, obnoxious, and attention-seeking in his ability to ‘drink’ any newcomer or visitor under the table. So these ‘peacocking’ mannerisms are not only about sexual mate-selection… but also directly about demonstrating to everybody else that crosses path in life, where your position is on Social Hierarchies – whether you are on the low end or high end.

Most people engage in these activities subconsciously and unconsciously, down to the very level of ideological beliefs. Here is where things get interesting.

Consider the BLM riots, Antifa marches, LGBTQ+ identities, or any other Leftist political cause. Also consider a Protestant Church’s organization, dogmatic adherence to religious beliefs, donating and tithing to the Mormon Church, etc. Whether Left or Right, the masses engage strenuously in these virtue-signaling (Peacocking) behaviors, to demonstrate their contribution, and their social-value, in their respective organizations and tiers of society. So when a white woman dates, marries, or has children with a black man, this is also her ‘virtue-signaling’ to others in society, that she can “race mix” with no negative repercussions. She is, supposedly, ‘above’ all the Conservative institutions and beliefs that would attempt to shame, punish, and exile her. Likewise, when a transexual Protestant “Priest” dons rainbow attire, and declares his church followers as “True Followers of Christ”, this is another demonstration of how ‘above’ classical and traditional standards, this particular covenant is or can be.

In all of these, though, the actual virtue “Signal” is a rebuke of other peoples’ values and beliefs. Groups are at odds with each-other. And whether one group comes out ahead, in the end… whether one group succeeds or rises to prominence, or political power, this is what (almost every?) group aspires toward: Legitimacy. By attaining political and social power, by becoming “accepted” by the “Mainstream”, all of these mean that your peacocking and virtue signaling is not, or has not, amounted to Nothing… that it was not a failure. And more so, that those who initiated the change, were Successful by doing so.

So how far does this rabbit-hole go? How much does it affect a person, or society’s, core-beliefs and core-values? How much of what YOU believe is or can be affected, by conflicting values of what precisely is signaled, to be your own Virtue?

Consider sportscars, motorcycles, jewelry, social status etc…and virtue signalling, as peacocking.
Self-handicapping.

Also consider:

The accusation of virtue signaling is most often lodged by folks who hate when others (unintentionally) make them look bad.

It’s like dumb students insulting smart ones. Should the smart ones …. act dumb? Sometimes, because they want to people-please, they do!

Where’s the real handicap?

Self-handicapping is just a male’s way of receiving feminine attentions, by displaying his ability to endure a burden.
The postmodern variant is particularly disgusting… a beta-male, unable to compete with other males, signals his social and ideological “fitness” by parroting feminist talking points and becoming an even more passionate feminist advocate then females.
He signals his indoctrination in systemic ideals.

This is also true with displays of wealth.
A male with weak natural fitness markers compensates by becoming wealthy and displaying his wealth and social privilege - signalling his access to resources and his loyalty and service to the system that rewarded him.
In a capitalist system this also dip0lays an ability to seduce others, who reward their seducer with money.

And also consider, how often it occurs around these parts, the claim or implications that one does or ought to, directly or indirectly benefit from his or her belief-systems… that your personal, private beliefs in life, all ought to directly benefit you in one way or another? Wouldn’t that mean that self-delusion would be the prima facie, default mode of existence and thought? That humans would be unable to take on Negative thoughts and beliefs, that Nature may actually be destructive, or that choices made in life may have disastrous consequences?

This is what makes ideological peacocking, virtue signaling, especially dangerous. False beliefs, propaganda, dogmas, etc. can all be damaging or fatal, when taken on by those who don’t really, fully understand them, and all their implications.

Ideological Peacocking:

That an individual may take on the most delusional, out-of-touch, nonsensical, ‘crazy’, insane beliefs and public displays… and then brag about it, using this as a mark of pride and significance. It announces to all those around, that despite all my insanity, I am protected from my fantasies and frivolous beliefs. That even if my advice destroys countless lives around me, that I am one to be emulated, copied, adored, and adulated. Because my errors are not paid by me, but by others.

And this is demonstration of my “Virtue” to the rest of Society.

May I please have an example of an “ideology” that benefits a person in meaningfulness, may cost them everything that is meaningless apart from it, and has no good argument to support its correspondence with reality?

How about any Abrahamic system, belief in God?

That’s the most common example I can think of.

Too many good arguments, if you’ve even “captured” the ideology.

Yes…the most common.
Shared victimhood.
Victims signaling to other victims their membership in the victim cult.

The meaning is clear>
Look how much punishment, injustice, I can endure and continue living.

Most don’t even believe in free-will, so this becomes spiritual. Divine.
Cosmic.
Part of a determined plan.

Choseness.

They were fated - chosen - to become aware of how impotent we “all are.”
you see the connection to Abrahamism.
Those few who know that they have no free-will, imply that they were fated - chosen - to be the ones who understood.
The rest of us are the equivalent of sinners, or satanic…we are “tricked” - free will is illusion - by fate…to believe we have agency.
Satan is a trickster, remember?

They believe they are atheists and have overcome abrahamism…but they are not.
They’ve only chosen different words to represent the exact same concepts.

.
Following… but nothing to add, as yet.

Virtue Signalling
Signalling your loyalties to the master.
A hierarchy of victims.

Tell me who you are unable to criticize, and I’ll tell you who rules over you.

I don’t use that word as a pejorative term. Everyone’s got a worldview.

And who can compete against the supposed suffering of Jesus Christ, “Chosen” to suffer? Christians idealize this Archetype as their morality and moral-basis. It is their worldview, hypothetically. Except when, put to the test, it’s clear to prove which of them actually believe their stated-beliefs… very few, almost none, maybe none perhaps.

Then there’s Jews and the Jewish people, who teach to their own children, their historical suffering and received ‘Hatred’ by non-Jews. They too, are in the Spiritual-Pain-Olympics, competing over greatest victimhood. This is not to say nor excuse that, sometimes, they might be victimized unjustly… but how about the times if and when it is just? Then you’re a dreaded “Anti-Semite!!! Urghhh!!!”

All of these Abrahamic morals, ethics, belief-systems, utilize pain-olympics as essential to their core morals and beliefs. And the more pain a person can endure, or ought to endure (on behalf of God), the more one earns eternal accolades and spiritual promotion… wouldn’t this inspire among them necessarily, then, to play the job of Protagonist against all the “wicked Evil” in the world, in Existence?

…and when there is no Evil around, then make it up! If Hitler and Nazism was defeated in 1945, then make New Nazis. Punch them in the face! The Evil Oppressors are out there, always, and THEY’re the ones to blame!

(Never me)

Being “unjustly victimized” is what keeps them unified.
The greatest threat to Judaism is assimilation.
They chose to live in ghettos, and they benefit from being resented.

Expelled over 100 times.
How can all of them be another’s fault.
This is where denial of free-will comes in handy.

It’s all determined by god or cosmic forces.
They’ve been chosen, fated, to be the ones who suffer, to bring about god’s will - end of times.
Conflict between Jews is over this issue.
For orthodox Jews the state of Israel is contrary to the prophesies… their plan.

“And who can compete against the supposed suffering of Jesus Christ”

Pfft, that guy doesn’t know what suffering is. Three days on a cross is nothing. I coulda done that in my sleep.

Humour is also a kind of signalling.

Satyr seems to be signaling something here.

Did Timmy fall into the well?

You’ve got some c’hutzpuh don’cha?

Absolutely, humor, deriding other men and cutting them down verbally, it’s a definitive signal. Consider all the passive-aggressiveness that males give and take when meeting strangers and other men, or women: “Shit-testing”. People subconsciously measure and want to reliably judge others, on where they fit in Social Hierarchies, “Is this a person I can fuck around with?”

Few people are self-conscious of their own participation, or others against them.