I just took the test and came out an INFJ. It would be interesting to see the profile of other ILP participants. Take the test and share your results:
ENFP
Qualitative analysis of your type formula
You are:
* distinctively expressed extravert
* distinctively expressed intuitive personality
* moderately expressed feeling personality
* moderately expressed perceiving personality
Your Type is:
[size=150]INTJ[/size]
Strength of the preferences %
Introverted 78
Intuitive 38
Thinking 62
Judging 67
Qualitative analysis of your type formula
You are:
* very expressed introvert
* moderately expressed intuitive personality
* distinctively expressed thinking personality
* distinctively expressed judging personality
INFJ
Introverted = 22
Intuitive = 12
Feeling = 12
Judging = 44
slightly expressed introvert
slightly expressed intuitive personality
slightly expressed feeling personality
moderately expressed judging personality
ENFJ
moderately expressed extravert
slightly expressed intuitive personality
moderately expressed feeling personality
slightly expressed judging personality
[size=150]INTJ[/size]
Introverted 56
Intuitive 38
Thinking 62
Judging 22
moderately expressed introvert
moderately expressed intuitive personality
distinctively expressed thinking personality
slightly expressed judging personality.
My Type is INTJ
Strength of the preferences %
Introverted 11
Intuitive 88
Thinking 88
Judging 11
I am:
slightly expressed introvert
very expressed intuitive personality
very expressed thinking personality
slightly expressed judging personality
…not a bad indicator of how I am 
My profile wasn’t that far off the mark:
I’m introverted, but love to meet (only) like minded people: hence the caged introvertedness, I guess.
I prefer going by my instincts: hence the high %age
I’m heavy on the thinking: before the doing: so again a high %age rate
It’s not my place to judge others, but sometimes you just gotta comment when someone is doing something that is so not right: hence the low %age rate…
INTJ took it awhile back… but also INFJ the other time i took it. It depends on the given day.
EDIT: Just took the test online this time… INTJ
Your Type is
INTJ
Introverted Intuitive Thinking Judging
Strength of the preferences %
56 50 38 11
Qualitative analysis of your type formula
You are:
* moderately expressed introvert
* moderately expressed intuitive personality
* moderately expressed thinking personality
* slightly expressed judging personality
Your Type is
ENTP
Extraverted Intuitive Thinking Perceiving
Strength of the preferences %
11 88 50 11
slightly expressed extravert
very expressed intuitive personality
moderately expressed thinking personality
slightly expressed perceiving personality
Your Type is
INTJ
Introverted Intuitive Thinking Judging
Strength of the preferences %
67 25 62 100
Qualitative analysis of your type formula
You are:
distinctively expressed introvert
moderately expressed intuitive personality
distinctively expressed thinking personality
very expressed judging personality
Your Type is
INTP
Introverted Intuitive Thinking Perceiving
Strength of the preferences %
33 62 38 22
You are:
moderately expressed introvert
distinctively expressed intuitive personality
moderately expressed thinking personality
slightly expressed perceiving personality
So what the hell is this supposed to mean?
It means you’re an introverted, intuitive, perception-based thinker…maybe?
I’d like to note how everyone here has an N in their code.
What does the N mean?
44,75,12,22 My direct answers in short- 01000|11111|10001|10011|01111|11001|10001|11011|01111|01101|11011|10101|01001|01111|11
This is pretty interesting. I’m going to keep a comprehensive tab on my relations with everyone whom posts here according to the theory. It’s almost like making a self-wiki.
My Identities include url=http://typelogic.com/intp.html[/url] Smears, Ellis, Pandora
My Pals include url=http://typelogic.com/entp.html[/url] XXL1337baller
My Complements include url=http://typelogic.com/intj.html[/url] magsj, joekoba, Tabula Rasa, Satyr, Pavlovianmodel146, Kriswest, Gwyllgi
My Contrasts include url=http://typelogic.com/entj.html[/url]
My Supplements include url=http://typelogic.com/isfj.html[/url] Joker
My Animas include url=http://typelogic.com/esfj.html[/url]
My Suitemates include url=http://typelogic.com/istj.html[/url]
My Cohorts include url=http://typelogic.com/estj.html[/url]
My Companions include url=http://typelogic.com/infp.html[/url]
My Tribesmen include url=http://typelogic.com/enfp.html[/url] Xunzian
My Advisors include url=http://typelogic.com/infj.html[/url] the of to, Mental_Edge, Felix Dakat
My Pedagogues include url=http://typelogic.com/enfj.html[/url] Bessy
My Enigmas include url=http://typelogic.com/isfp.html[/url]
My Novelties include url=http://typelogic.com/esfp.html[/url]
My Neighbors include url=http://typelogic.com/istp.html[/url]
My Counterparts include url=http://typelogic.com/estp.html[/url]
Your Type is
INTJ
Introverted Intuitive Thinking Judging
Strength of the preferences %
67 50 12 33
You are:
distinctively expressed introvert
moderately expressed intuitive personality
slightly expressed thinking personality
moderately expressed judging personality
INFJ
Introverted Intuitive Feeling Judging
67 62 25 22
distinctively expressed introvert
distinctively expressed intuitive personality
moderately expressed feeling personality
slightly expressed judging personality
Your Type is
INTJ
Introverted Intuitive Thinking Judging
Qualitative analysis of your type formula
You are:
* slightly expressed introvert
* moderately expressed intuitive personality
* moderately expressed thinking personality
* moderately expressed judging personality
Hmm…somewhere right, I guess. I’d peg myself as more of an extrovert, though…just one that withdraws for odd lengths of time…like my
Okay, let’s philosophize the accuracy of quizzes like these.
The questions are transparent enough that you know the results before you get them.
Is it:
a. gay
b. gay
c. a gimmick
or d. gay
Please text your answers to 1-800-I stole your money you dumbass consumerist.
Who read the disclaimer without their glasses on?
“Although the information and test answers contained herein have been compiled from sources believed to be reliable, humanmetrics.com makes no guarantee, representation, assurance or warranty, express or implied, as to, and assumes no responsiblity for the correctness, sufficiency or completeness of such information or answers or of the scoring of tests contained herein. ALL TESTS ARE PRESENTED IN AN “AS IS” CONDITION AND ANY WARRANTIES FOR FITNESS OF PURPOSE OF MERCHANTABILITY ARE HEREBY EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMED. All claims arising out of the use of this site shall be governed by the laws of the State of Israel. Users of this site hereby irrevocably submit to the jurisdiction of, and agree to initiate and prosecute any and all claims that may be brought against humanmetrics.com exclusively in the State of Israel Courts and irrevocably waive any objection they may now or hereafter have as to the venue of suits or that such Courts are an inconvenient forum. Users of this site further agree that humanmetrics.com shall not be responsible or liable to users or any other person as successor, assignee or third party beneficiary of users for indirect, punitive, exemplary, special or consequential damages which may be alleged as resulting, directly or indirectly, from the use of this site.”
I think we all mostly agree that there is no surefire evidence, altd&s, but this system has become a hallmark of the behavioural sciences. A great deal of hard working psychologists use the system, even though perhaps not directly from this website. I leave it to Felixdakat as its introducer to defend its credibility.
The root question is probably wheather you actually believe in the legitamecy of behavioural sciences. After all, I too believe that simply observing something and passing a questionnaire without instrumentation is generally unreliable.
Now that I think of it, this is a philosophy forum. We surely answer a lot of big questions in our own answers, multiple choice or not. Why don’t we just answer the questionnaire in our post by the choices it gives us? You could simplify it such as "1010011100 . . . " 0 for no 1 for yes.