It’s a scientific FACT that the individual who is metaphysical and resides within the void of space interprets varying frequency electromagnetic energy waves emitted from vibrating matter so the individual isn’t vibrating matter nor the electromagnetic energy waves emitted from it.If you want find the top scientists you can and see if they want to challenge this then find them and I will educate them further.
The only time an individual could be reduced to the metaphysical in my opinion, is when they return to the true formless spirit of their soul. Then they have no influence over matter, neither are they influenced by it.
But, you say this is how all matter is held together, then I would ask, how does a neutron fit into the equation?
Neutrons spin and have N and S poles.
If all matter were to disappear into all the holes at the centre of all the galaxies from where it all came then all that would be left is spinning holes within the electromagnetic fields which saturate the cosmos.
These electromagnetic fields are not tied to matter.
The individual is metaphysical.The physical body is the binary processing interface between the physical and the metaphysical.
1 Like
This is old hat, as a programmer I knew this technique a while ago, it is a useful computer programming technique to find an approximate value… by halving and doubling results, you can reach an approximate value…
Not a clue what this tertiary thing is that you are talking about though.
What languages do you usually program in?
Tertiary computing, also known as ternary or trinary computing, refers to computational systems that use three discrete states instead of the binary system’s two states. These systems operate using trits—ternary digits—rather than binary bits, with the most common implementation being balanced ternary, which uses the values −1, 0, and +1. This approach allows negative numbers to be represented without a leading sign, and subtraction can be performed by inverting the signs of digits and then adding, simplifying certain arithmetic operations. Balanced ternary is considered by some, including Donald Knuth, to be the “prettiest number system of all” due to its mathematical elegance and efficiency.
Oh I’ve heard of ternary code, is that all it is? I thought you were talking about something new.
I was talking about something new, a way for humans to use ternary for mental calculation and quickly achieve results.
Yeah I’m reading it over again and I don’t think I know what this tertiary stuff is. When you said “ternary” i thought you meant the “? operator” which is nothing more than a way to write if else.
Not a clue what this tertiary thing is, sounds like a replacement for binary that I’ve never heard of.
The Russians had working examples way back in the 50’s:
1 Like
Jupiter123:
We can be sure because balancing these two force absolutes holds all matter together and therefore mass is balanced out.All vibrating matter levitates in space as a result.This is only way that energy can be produced in the cosmos.The only way that energy is regulated in the cosmos is by increasing or decreasing the spin speed of the particles as this increases or decreases the frequency of the vibratory interactions between particles and this directly impacts the amount of electromagnetic energy waves emitted from a matter type.
Your problem is you don’t know enough about how philosophy relates to science Peter which is just one of the reasons you are a very poor philosopher.
E=mc2 is total nonsense…Einstein didn’t have a clue about reality science.
You have been taken for a fool Peter.
K: I know this, that you are saying you are a better scientist than
Einstein and he was one of the top two, depending on your classification,
scientists of all time… and you claim to be a better scientist
than Einstein, thus you claim to be the greatest scientist of all
time…and by extension, the greatest philosopher of all time…
So, when did you win your first Nobel prize award,
and how many other scientific awards have you won?
How many peer reviewed papers do you have and where
would I find them? What university are you a professor at,
and what department, be it physics and/or philosophy
department, do you work at? In general, what specific
areas do you have degrees in? If you are, as you claim
to be, the greatest scientists of all time, someone else
would have noticed, so please share with us those people
who have agreed with your assessment, that you are
the greatest scientist of all time? You mentioned Tesla,
clearly you are a greater scientist then Tesla… tell us
why that is true?
please enlightened us mere common people as to your
greatness… we would be delighted to know a genius
is in our midst…
Kropotkin
1 Like
"Democracy is sacred and divine, democracy especially a global one without borders within a liberal framework will save humanity. One world government is inevitable, unicorn farts will get us there over a magical rainbow listening to John Lennon in the background. I am Peter Kropotkin.
If you’re not liberal or democratic I cannot conclude that you’re even human. I am Peter Kropotkin."
"We must purge the world of Trump supporters or anything remotely traditionally conservative. They must all be annihilated everywhere.
We must abolish nation states everywhere. I am Peter Kropotkin. (Secret closet Trotskyist)
What is the point of providing a cognitively unbiased scientific paper to mainstream atheistic peers who only review cognitively biased nonsense papers? Utterly pointless.
Atheistic scientists can and do honour themsleves all the time but we all know that their theories don’t work.
They can’t find fault with a cognitively unbiased starting philosophy science Peter (+/-=+/-).
Atheists exist and want everyone to believe that they are a MISREPRESENTATION of reality (an illusion).This is another fact…You don’t like facts Peter…that’s your problem.
You are wasting your time because you are a very poor philosopher.
Do you know what the biggest problem is for mainstream scientists and they don’t even realise it?
Their cognitively biased theories are unable to explain how binary data is produced in the cosmos so they are utterly useless.
They are therefore floundering around in the dark, lost, producing one meaningless theory after another.
Yes,I’m a far far better philosopher and scientist than Einstein because I am a different philosopher and scientist to Einstein.My cognitively unbiased theories which are a progression of Nikola Tesla’s theories make sense and work.Einsteins cognitively biased theories made no sense whatsoever and didn’t work.